Works matching Fourth Amendment
1
- EurAmerica, 2018, v. 48, n. 2, p. 267
- Article
2
- Financial & Economic Law Review, 2024, n. 49, p. 75, doi. 10.53106/1815008X494
- Article
3
- Law, Culture & the Humanities, 2016, v. 12, n. 3, p. 669, doi. 10.1177/1743872114520893
- Article
4
- Political Sciences / Politické Vedy, 2019, v. 22, n. 1, p. 229, doi. 10.24040/politickevedy.2019.22.1.229-246
- Article
5
- International & Comparative Law Review / Mezinárodní a Srovnávací Právní Revue, 2020, v. 20, n. 1, p. 27, doi. 10.2478/iclr-2020-0002
- Article
6
- Information Security Journal: A Global Perspective, 2008, v. 17, n. 3, p. 143, doi. 10.1080/19393550802140979
- Article
7
- Contemporary Justice Review, 2017, v. 20, n. 2, p. 227, doi. 10.1080/10282580.2017.1311193
- Brown, Ben;
- Buckler, Kevin
- Article
8
- Journal of Pain & Palliative Care Pharmacotherapy, 2011, v. 25, n. 1, p. 42, doi. 10.3109/15360288.2010.549549
- Article
9
- Education & Urban Society, 2008, v. 40, n. 3, p. 377, doi. 10.1177/0013124507304450
- Torres, Jr., Mario S.;
- Callahan, Jamie L.
- Article
10
- Information & Communications Technology Law, 2023, v. 32, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.1080/13600834.2021.1998954
- Article
11
- American Journal of Criminal Justice, 2013, v. 38, n. 3, p. 422, doi. 10.1007/s12103-012-9180-4
- Article
12
- Indiana Law Review, 2013, v. 46, n. 3, p. 753, doi. 10.18060/18045
- Article
14
- Information & Communications Technology Law, 2010, v. 19, n. 2, p. 189, doi. 10.1080/13600834.2010.494061
- Article
15
- Washington & Lee Law Review, 2016, v. 73, n. 4, p. 1689
- Article
16
- William & Mary Law Review, 2021, v. 62, n. 5, p. 1727
- Article
17
- George Washington Law Review, 2021, v. 89, n. 4, p. 1046
- Article
18
- George Washington Law Review, 2020, v. 88, n. 3, p. 788
- Article
19
- George Washington Law Review, 2020, v. 88, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
21
- Brigham Young University Education & Law Journal, 2009, v. 2009, n. 1, p. 39
- Article
22
- University of Miami Inter-American Law Review, 2016, v. 48, n. 2, p. 153
- Article
23
- St. Thomas Law Review, 2013, v. 25, n. 2, p. 244
- Article
24
- St. Mary's Law Journal, 2016, v. 48, n. 1, p. 115
- Article
25
- SMU Law Review, 2023, v. 76, n. 2, p. 315, doi. 10.25172/smulr.76.2.5
- Article
26
- SMU Law Review, 2021, v. 74, n. 1, p. 3
- Article
27
- SMU Law Review, 2020, v. 73, n. 3, p. 611
- Article
28
- Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2011, v. 26, n. 1, p. 859
- Article
29
- South Dakota Law Review, 2015, v. 60, n. 1, p. 93
- Article
30
- European Data Protection Law Review (EDPL), 2019, v. 5, n. 2, p. 266, doi. 10.21552/edpl/2019/2/18
- Rotenberg, Marc;
- Petkova, Bilyana
- Article
31
- Texas Review of Law & Politics, 2021, v. 25, n. 2, p. 473
- Article
32
- UMKC Law Review, 2022, v. 91, n. 2, p. 291
- Article
33
- U.C. Davis Law Review, 2015, v. 48, n. 3, p. 855
- Article
34
- U.C. Davis Law Review, 2014, v. 47, n. 5, p. 1591
- Article
35
- Nevada Law Journal, 2015, v. 16, n. 1, p. 373
- Article
36
- Missouri Law Review, 2024, v. 89, n. 1, p. 1
- Totten, Christopher D.;
- Lee, Gang;
- De Leo, Michael
- Article
37
- Missouri Law Review, 2014, v. 79, n. 3, p. 755
- Article
38
- Texas Law Review, 2025, v. 103, n. 6, p. 1357
- Article
39
- Texas Law Review, 2025, v. 103, n. 6, p. 1253
- Article
40
- Texas Law Review, 2021, v. 99, n. 3, p. 447
- Article
41
- Stanford Law Review, 2010, v. 62, n. 4, p. 1005
- Article
42
- Stanford Law Review, 2007, v. 60, n. 2, p. 503
- Article
43
- Maryland Law Review, 2017, v. 76, n. 3, p. 747
- Article
44
- Urban Lawyer, 2007, v. 39, n. 1, p. 75
- Article
45
- Columbia Journal of Law & Social Problems, 2015, v. 48, n. 2, p. 265
- Article
46
- Boston University Law Review, 2023, v. 103, n. 4, p. 1201
- LIEBERFELD, JESSE;
- RICHARDS, NEIL
- Article
47
- Boston University Law Review, 2017, v. 97, n. 3, p. 893
- Article
48
- Boston University Law Review, 2016, v. 96, n. 2, p. 425
- Article
49
- Boston University Law Review, 2014, v. 94, n. 6, p. 1809
- Article
50
- Northwestern University Law Review, 2022, v. 117, n. 2, p. 473
- Article