FMRI and BF Meet FRE: Brain Imaging and the Federal Rules of Evidence.
- Published in:
- American Journal of Law & Medicine, 2007, v. 33, n. 2/3, p. 319, doi. 10.1177/009885880703300208
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Works matching Federal Rules of Evidence (FRE)
Results: 37
1
2
TOWARD A MORE PERFECT TRIAL: AMENDING FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE 106 AND 803 TO COMPLETE THE RULE OF COMPLETENESS.
- Published in:
- Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 2021, v. 111, n. 4, p. 839
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
3
Use of Confidential Information in Motion Practice.
- Published in:
- Tulane Journal of International & Comparative Law, 2011, v. 19, n. 2, p. 565
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
4
SOUTH DAKOTA EVIDENCE: SIGNIFICANT DEVELOPMENTS.
- Published in:
- South Dakota Law Review, 2018, v. 63, n. 2, p. 239
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
5
SOUTH DAKOTA EVIDENCE: COMMENTS ON A "GIANT STEP".
- Published in:
- South Dakota Law Review, 2014, v. 59, n. 2, p. 343
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
6
Impact of Gruesome Photographic Evidence on Legal Decisions: A Meta-Analysis.
- Published in:
- Psychiatry, Psychology & Law, 2018, v. 25, n. 4, p. 503, doi. 10.1080/13218719.2018.1440468
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
7
Federal Civil Rule Reform: An Update.
- Published in:
- Defense Counsel Journal, 2019, v. 86, n. 3, p. 1
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
8
EXPORTING THE HEARSAY PROVISIONS OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE.
- Published in:
- Boston University International Law Journal, 2015, v. 33, n. 2, p. 101
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
9
ARE THE FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE DYNAMITE?
- Published in:
- Boston University International Law Journal, 2015, v. 33, n. 2, p. 101
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
10
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW -- IT WASN'T ME! ZINGER V. STATE AND ARKANSAS'S UNCONSTITUTIONAL APPROACH TO THIRD-PARTY EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE.
- Published in:
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review, 2011, v. 34, n. 1, p. 191
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
11
INADVERTENT PRODUCTION OF PRIVILEGED INFORMATION IN DISCOVERY IN FEDERAL COURT: THE NEED FOR WELL-DRAFTED CLAWBACK AGREEMENTS.
- Published in:
- South Carolina Law Review, 2013, v. 64, n. 3, p. 581
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
12
LIMITING LIMITED LIABILITY: REQUIRING MORE THAN MERE SUBSEQUENCE UNDER FEDERAL RULE OF EVIDENCE 407.
- Published in:
- Boston University Law Review, 2022, v. 102, n. 7, p. 2497
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
13
Caging the Beast: Formulating Effective Evidentiary Rules to Deal with Sexual Offenders.
- Published in:
- American Journal of Criminal Law, 2006, v. 34, n. 1, p. 1
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
14
TESTABLE RELIABILITY: A MODERNIZED APPROACH TO ESI ADMISSIBILITY.
- Published in:
- Ave Maria Law Review, 2014, v. 12, n. 2, p. 213
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
15
A PROSECUTOR'S GUIDE TO CHARACTER EVIDENCE: WHEN IS UNCHARGED POSSESSION EVIDENCE PROBATIVE OF A DEFENDANT'S INTENT TO DISTRIBUTE?
- Published in:
- Marquette Law Review, 2015, v. 98, n. 3, p. 1383
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
16
TO BAN OR NOT TO BAN: EXCLUDING EVIDENCE OF SUBSEQUENT REMEDIAL MEASURES IN BREACH OF CONTRACT ACTIONS.
- Published in:
- Charleston Law Review, 2023, v. 18, n. 2, p. 279
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
17
Scientific and Other Expert Testimony: Understand It; Keep It Out; Get It In.
- Published in:
- FDCC Quarterly, 2007, v. 57, n. 3, p. 207
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
18
Admissions: What They Are and How They Can Impact Litigation.
- Published in:
- Pace Law Review, 2012, v. 32, n. 2, p. 436, doi. 10.58948/2331-3528.1806
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
19
THREE EVIDENTIARY APPROACHES TO PARTY "ADMISSIONS" BY EXPERTS.
- Published in:
- Appalachian Journal of Law, 2013, v. 12, n. 2, p. 227
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
20
The Applicability of the Federal Rules of Evidence at Class Certification.
- Published in:
- UCLA Law Review, 2018, v. 65, n. 1, p. 280
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
21
AMBIGUITY IN THE PRESENTATION OF EVIDENCE: WHY NORTH DAKOTA SHOULD FOLLOW THE FEDERAL JUDICIARY'S GUIDANCE REGARDING THE PRESENTATION OF EVIDENCE IN STATE COURT MATTERS.
- Published in:
- North Dakota Law Review, 2024, v. 99, n. 2, p. 483
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
22
Clogged Conduits: A Defendant's Right to Confront His Translated Statements.
- Published in:
- University of Chicago Law Review, 2014, v. 81, n. 4, p. 1931
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
23
Symposium: Reimagining the Rules of Evidence at 50.
- Published in:
- Vanderbilt Law Review, 2023, v. 76, n. 6, p. 1603
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
24
Shifting the Male Gaze of Evidence.
- Published in:
- Vanderbilt Law Review, 2023, v. 76, n. 6, p. 1903
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
25
A SECOND RAPE: TESTING VICTIM CREDIBILITY THROUGH PRIOR FALSE ACCUSATIONS.
- Published in:
- University of Illinois Law Review, 2018, v. 2018, n. 3, p. 1091
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
26
EVIDENCE.
- Published in:
- Georgia State University Law Review, 2011, v. 28, n. 1, p. 1
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
27
EVIDENCE.
- Published in:
- Georgia State University Law Review, 2010, v. 27, n. 1, p. 1
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
28
ARE THE FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE UNCONSTITUTIONAL?.
- Published in:
- American University Law Review, 2022, v. 71, n. 3, p. 911
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
29
The Perfect Storm: Rule 404(b), Unequivocal Stipulations, and Old Chief's Dicta on Narrative Integrity and Evidentiary Richness.
- Published in:
- New England Journal on Criminal & Civil Confinement, 2011, v. 37, n. 1, p. 55
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
30
The Admissibility of an Accused's Choice of Reading Material as Evidence Under Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b): What Are the Constitutional Implications of this Type of Evidence?
- Published in:
- New England Journal on Criminal & Civil Confinement, 2008, v. 34, n. 2, p. 349
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
31
DIGITAL HABIT EVIDENCE.
- Published in:
- Duke Law Journal, 2023, v. 72, n. 4, p. 723
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
32
HACKING THROUGH THE JUNGLE: TAKING A MACHETE TO THE ADMISSIBILITY JUNGLE OF DEFERRED PROSECUTION AGREEMENTS.
- Published in:
- Review of Litigation, 2022, v. 41, n. 2, p. 217
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
33
The Application and Construction of Rules of Admissibility in the Federal Rules of Evidence in Cases Where State Law Provides the Rule of Decision.
- Published in:
- Review of Litigation, 2015, v. 34, n. 2, p. 283
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
34
Georgia's New Evidence Code: After the Celebration, a Serious Review of Anticipated Subjects of Litigation to be Brought on by the New Legislation.
- Published in:
- Mercer Law Review, 2012, v. 64, n. 1, p. 1
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
35
Admissibility: Federal Rules of Evidence 702 Revisited.
- Published in:
- Rehabilitation Professional, 2022, v. 30, n. 3, p. 13
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
36
IT'S NOT POPULAR BUT IT SURE IS RIGHT: THE (IN)ADMISSIBILITY OF STATEMENTS MADE PURSUANT TO SEXUAL OFFENDER TREATMENT PROGRAMS.
- Published in:
- Syracuse Law Review, 2012, v. 62, n. 2, p. 255
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
37
Should Oregon Adopt the New Federal Rules of Evidence?
- Published in:
- 2011
- By:
- Publication type:
- Essay