Works matching Equal protection clause and the Supreme Court
1
- Creighton Law Review, 2024, v. 57, n. 2, p. 189
- Article
2
- Rutgers Law Journal, 2014, v. 44, n. 4, p. 681
- Article
3
- California Legal History, 2014, v. 9, p. 203
- Article
4
- Iowa Law Review, 2010, v. 95, n. 5, p. 1731
- Article
5
- Stanford Law Review, 2017, v. 69, n. 5, p. 1237
- Article
6
- Washington Law Review, 2012, v. 87, n. 1, p. 331
- Zellers, P. Andrew Rorholm
- Article
7
- Texas Journal on Civil Liberties & Civil Rights, 2002, v. 7, n. 2, p. 141
- Green, Preston C.;
- Baker, Bruce D.
- Article
8
- University of Chicago Law Review, 2022, v. 89, n. 1, p. 253
- Article
9
- University of Chicago Law Review, 2016, v. 83, n. 4, p. 2213
- Article
11
- New York University Law Review, 2013, v. 88, n. 1, p. 373
- Article
12
- Columbia Journal of Gender & Law, 2022, v. 43, n. 1, p. 67
- SIEGEL, REVA B.;
- MAYERI, SERENA;
- MURRAY, MELISSA
- Article
13
- Columbia Journal of Gender & Law, 2013, p. 41
- Article
14
- Maryland Law Review, 2015, v. 75, n. 1, p. 247
- Article
15
- Urban Lawyer, 2015, v. 47, n. 1, p. 1
- Wasserman, Lewis M;
- Connolly, John P;
- Steen, Pamela L
- Article
16
- Acta Universitatis Carolinae Iuridica, 2021, v. 67, n. 1, p. 7, doi. 10.14712/23366478.2021.1
- Article
17
- Duke Law Journal, 2024, v. 73, n. 5, p. 1141
- Article
18
- Duke Law Journal, 2017, v. 66, n. 8, p. 1807
- Article
19
- Columbia Law Review, 2024, v. 124, n. 6, p. 1823
- Article
20
- Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy, 2016, v. 12, n. 1, p. 107
- Article
21
- Harvard Law & Policy Review, 2021, v. 16, n. 1, p. 115
- Biale, Noam;
- Hinton, Elizabeth;
- Ross, Elizabeth
- Article
22
- Emory Law Journal, 2021, v. 70, n. 5, p. 1143
- Article
23
- Emory Law Journal, 2009, v. 59, n. 1, p. 211
- Article
24
- Temple Law Review, 2019, v. 91, n. 3, p. 513
- Article
25
- American Bar Association Journal, 1982, v. 68, n. 8, p. 1000
- Article
26
- American Bar Association Journal, 1978, v. 64, n. 12, p. 1911
- Article
27
- Southern California Law Review, 2025, v. 98, n. 2, p. 305
- MAROUF, FATMA;
- CASADO PÉREZ, VANESSA
- Article
28
- Southern California Law Review, 2022, v. 95, n. 2, p. 365
- Article
29
- Southern California Law Review, 2016, v. 90, n. 1, p. 85
- Article
30
- Ohio State Law Journal, 2024, v. 85, n. 3, p. 355
- Article
31
- Review of Public Personnel Administration, 2009, v. 29, n. 1, p. 3, doi. 10.1177/0734371X08327959
- Article
32
- Law & Contemporary Problems, 1970, v. 35, n. 4, p. 901, doi. 10.2307/1190955
- Article
33
- Review of Law & Social Change, 2018, v. 42, n. 3, p. 451
- Article
34
- California Law Review, 2013, v. 101, n. 6, p. 1565
- Article
35
- Developments in Mental Health Law, 2012, v. 31, n. 2, p. 1
- Article
36
- Pace International Law Review, 2014, v. 26, n. 2, p. 1, doi. 10.58948/2331-3536.1339
- Article
37
- Journal of Gender, Race & Justice, 2016, v. 18, n. 2, p. 477
- Article
38
- North Dakota Law Review, 2015, v. 91, n. 1, p. 219
- Article
39
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2009, v. 32, n. 1, p. 105
- Article
40
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 1995, v. 19, n. 1, p. 188
- Article
41
- Washington University Law Review, 2014, v. 92, n. 2, p. 325
- Article
42
- Revista Jurídica (08862516), 2015, v. 84, n. 1, p. 61
- Article
43
- Iowa Law Review, 2008, v. 93, n. 4, p. 1423
- Article
44
- Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 2023, v. 20, n. 3, p. 609, doi. 10.1111/jels.12357
- Effenberger, Anna;
- Blume, John H.;
- Wells, Martin T.
- Article
45
- Ecology Law Quarterly, 2007, v. 34, n. 2, p. 493
- Article
47
- Stanford Law Review, 2016, v. 68, n. 1, p. 151
- Article
48
- Journal of Law & Politics, 2017, v. 33, n. 1, p. 1
- Chambers, Christopher P.;
- Miller, Alan D.;
- Sobel, Joel
- Article
49
- Michigan State International Law Review, 2021, v. 29, n. 1, p. 77
- Article
50
- Journal of Supreme Court History, 2025, v. 50, n. 2, p. 154, doi. 10.1353/sch.2025.a964146
- Article