Works matching Effective counsel
1
- Pace Law Review, 2011, v. 31, n. 2, p. 560, doi. 10.58948/2331-3528.1776
- Article
3
- Boston College Law Review, 2009, v. 50, n. 5, p. 1607
- Article
4
- Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 2020, v. 110, n. 3, p. 655
- Article
5
- California Law Review, 1971, v. 59, n. 1, p. 199
- Article
6
- Boston University Law Review, 2025, v. 105, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
7
- Florida Bar Journal, 2015, v. 89, n. 6, p. 80
- Article
8
- Iowa Law Review, 2014, v. 99, n. 5, p. 2103
- Joy, Peter A.;
- Uphoff, Rodney J.
- Article
9
- Iowa Law Review, 2011, v. 96, n. 2, p. 669
- Article
10
- Utah Law Review, 2006, v. 2006, n. 4, p. 1185
- Article
11
- Tennessee Bar Journal, 2005, v. 41, n. 9, p. 26
- Article
12
- University of Cincinnati Law Review, 2015, v. 83, n. 4, p. 1215
- Article
13
- Hofstra Law Review, 2017, v. 46, n. 1, p. 139
- Article
14
- Hofstra Law Review, 2013, v. 42, n. 1, p. 303
- Article
15
- Washburn Law Journal, 2012, v. 51, n. 3, p. 571
- Article
16
- European Accounting Review, 2021, v. 30, n. 2, p. 405, doi. 10.1080/09638180.2020.1763819
- Al Mamun, MD;
- Balachandran, Balasingham;
- Duong, Huu Nhan;
- Gul, Ferdinand A
- Article
17
- UMKC Law Review, 2011, v. 79, n. 4, p. 925
- Article
18
- American Journal of Criminal Law, 2007, v. 34, n. 2, p. 127
- Blume, John H.;
- Neumann, Stacey D.
- Article
19
- Washington Law Review, 2011, v. 86, n. 4, p. 905
- Article
20
- Creighton Law Review, 2016, v. 49, n. 3, p. 523
- Article
21
- St. Louis University Public Law Review, 2011, v. 30, n. 2, p. 43
- Article
22
- Duquesne Law Review, 2013, v. 51, n. 2, p. 487
- Article
23
- Federal Sentencing Reporter (University of California Press), 2012, v. 25, n. 2, p. 122, doi. 10.1525/fsr.2012.25.2.122
- Article
24
- New York University Law Review, 2023, v. 98, n. 3, p. 770
- Article
25
- University of Illinois Law Review, 2022, v. 2022, n. 3, p. 1021
- Article
27
- Public Relations Tactics, 2008, v. 15, n. 2, p. 12
- Article
28
- Touro Law Review, 2013, v. 29, n. 4, p. 1469
- Article
29
- Mercer Law Review, 2015, v. 66, n. 3, p. 781
- Article
30
- Juridica International, 2010, v. 17, p. 252
- Article
31
- Texas Tech Law Review, 2012, v. 45, n. 1, p. 229
- Article
32
- Psychology, Crime & Law, 2020, v. 26, n. 6, p. 527, doi. 10.1080/1068316X.2019.1696801
- Henderson, Kelsey S.;
- Shteynberg, Reveka V.
- Article
33
- Criminal Justice Policy Review, 2017, v. 28, n. 1, p. 3, doi. 10.1177/0887403414562603
- Article
34
- Nevada Law Journal, 2017, v. 17, n. 2, p. 401
- Article
35
- Fordham Urban Law Journal, 2013, v. 41, n. 1, p. 177
- Article
36
- Columbia Journal of Race & Law, 2019, v. 9, n. 2, p. 323
- Article
37
- University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 2020, v. 168, n. 2, p. 277
- Article
39
- Stanford Law Review, 2023, v. 75, n. 6, p. 1531
- Valente, Sergio Filipe Zanutta
- Article
40
- New York University Law Review, 2014, v. 89, n. 5, p. 1836
- Article
41
- Denver Law Review, 2016, v. 93, n. 2, p. 389
- Article
42
- Michigan Journal of Race & Law, 2014, v. 19, n. 2, p. 415
- Article
43
- American Journal of Trial Advocacy, 2015, v. 38, n. 1, p. 121
- Article
44
- 1981
- Maragos, N E;
- Neel, H B 3rd;
- McDonald, T J
- journal article
45
- Economic Journal, 1996, v. 106, n. 435, p. 387, doi. 10.2307/2235254
- Dolton, Peter;
- O'Neill, Donal
- Article
46
- Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal, 2021, v. 30, n. 3, p. 611
- OSTROM, BRIAN J.;
- BOWMAN, JORDAN
- Article
47
- Journal of Contemporary Legal Issues, 2007, v. 16, n. 1, p. 329
- Article
48
- South Dakota Law Review, 2011, v. 56, n. 2, p. 238
- Article
49
- Social Work, 1987, v. 32, n. 5, p. 371
- Article
50
- Supportive Care in Cancer, 2025, v. 33, n. 7, p. 1, doi. 10.1007/s00520-025-09623-2
- Walker, Lauren M.;
- Spratt, Jorja K.;
- Hutchison, Tricia;
- Driga, Amy;
- Robinson, John;
- Turner, Jill;
- Ayume, Ashley;
- Wiebe, Ericka
- Article