Works matching Dworkin, Ronald, 1931-2013
2
- Ratio Juris, 2013, v. 26, n. 4, p. 560, doi. 10.1111/raju.12025
- Article
3
- Collected Papers of the Faculty of Law in Split / Zbornik Radova Pravnog Fakulteta u Splitu, 2013, v. 50, n. 1, p. 263
- Article
4
- 2016
- LEIB, ETHAN J.;
- GALOOB, STEPHEN R.
- Essay
6
- University of Chicago Law Review, 2017, v. 84, n. 1, p. 249
- Schauer, Frederick;
- Spellman, Barbara A.
- Article
7
- Villanova Law Review, 2013, v. 58, n. 4, p. 691
- Article
8
- Artificial Intelligence & Law, 2015, v. 23, n. 1, p. 43, doi. 10.1007/s10506-015-9164-z
- Article
9
- New York University Law Review, 2014, v. 89, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
10
- Dados - Revista de Ciências Sociais, 2013, v. 56, n. 4, p. 943, doi. 10.1590/S0011-52582013000400007
- Article
11
- Persona y Derecho, 2009, n. 60, p. 131
- Article
12
- Journal of Human Rights, 2006, v. 5, n. 2, p. 235, doi. 10.1080/14754830600653561
- Article
13
- Scripta Theologica, 2020, v. 52, n. 3, p. 763, doi. 10.15581/006.52.3.763-792
- Article
14
- Scripta Theologica, 2020, v. 52, n. 3, p. 763, doi. 10.15581/006.52.3.763-792
- Article
15
- Revus: Journal for Constitutional Theory & Philosophy of Law, 2022, v. 48, p. 75
- Article
16
- Revus: Journal for Constitutional Theory & Philosophy of Law, 2021, v. 43, p. 223
- Article
17
- Revus: Journal for Constitutional Theory & Philosophy of Law, 2021, v. 43, p. 113
- Article
18
- Revus: Journal for Constitutional Theory & Philosophy of Law, 2016, v. 28, p. 1, doi. 10.4000/revus.3345
- Article
21
- Journal of Ethics, 2017, v. 21, n. 2, p. 185, doi. 10.1007/s10892-017-9247-z
- Article
22
- Law of Ukraine / Pravo Ukraini, 2021, n. 1, p. 12, doi. 10.33498/louu-2021-01-012
- Article
23
- Studia Humana, 2018, v. 7, n. 3, p. 31, doi. 10.2478/sh-2018-0016
- Article
24
- Duke Law Journal, 2022, v. 71, n. 6, p. 1391
- Article
27
- California Law Review, 1989, v. 77, n. 3, p. 515, doi. 10.2307/3480557
- Article
28
- California Law Review, 1989, v. 77, n. 3, p. 505, doi. 10.2307/3480556
- Article
30
- California Law Review, 1985, v. 73, n. 1, p. 158, doi. 10.2307/3480466
- Article
31
- California Law Review, 1984, v. 72, n. 3, p. 369, doi. 10.2307/3480482
- Article
33
- Law & Justice Review, 2021, v. 12, n. 22, p. 151
- Article
34
- CIVILIZAR: Ciencias Sociales y Humanas, 2012, v. 12, n. 22, p. 57, doi. 10.22518/16578953.91
- Suárez Rodríguez, José Julián
- Article
35
- Journal of Political Science & Sociology, 2010, n. 12, p. 49
- Article
37
- Law, Culture & the Humanities, 2007, v. 3, n. 1, p. 55, doi. 10.1177/1743872107073237
- Article
38
- Essays in the Philosophy of Humanism, 2013, v. 21, n. 2, p. 125
- Article
39
- Revista Cultura Económica, 2011, v. 29, n. 81/82, p. 64
- Article
40
- Harvard Law & Policy Review, 2015, v. 9, n. 1, p. 161
- Article
41
- American Literary History, 1999, v. 11, n. 3, p. 513, doi. 10.1093/alh/11.3.513
- Article
42
- Opinión Jurídica, 2013, v. 12, n. 23, p. 151
- Soto Obregón, Martha Elena;
- Canizales, Raúl Ruiz
- Article
43
- Western New England Law Review, 2020, v. 42, n. 2, p. 215
- Article
44
- Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence, 2024, v. 37, n. 1, p. 109, doi. 10.1017/cjlj.2024.2
- Article
45
- Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence, 2024, v. 37, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.1017/cjlj.2023.10
- Costa Val Rodrigues, Gabriel
- Article
46
- Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence, 2023, v. 36, n. 1, p. 215, doi. 10.1017/cjlj.2022.23
- Article
47
- Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence, 2019, v. 32, n. 1, p. 195, doi. 10.1017/cjlj.2019.9
- Article
48
- Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence, 2019, v. 32, n. 1, p. 5, doi. 10.1017/cjlj.2019.1
- Article
49
- Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence, 2018, v. 31, n. 2, p. 323, doi. 10.1017/cjlj.2018.15
- Article
50
- Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence, 2017, v. 30, n. 2, p. 259, doi. 10.1017/cjlj.2017.13
- Article