Works matching Dworkin, Ronald, 1931-2013
1
- Ratio Juris, 2013, v. 26, n. 4, p. 560, doi. 10.1111/raju.12025
- Article
3
- Collected Papers of the Faculty of Law in Split / Zbornik Radova Pravnog Fakulteta u Splitu, 2013, v. 50, n. 1, p. 263
- Article
4
- Mississippi Sports Law Review, 2024, v. 13, n. 1, p. 180
- Article
6
- Hypatia, 1999, v. 14, n. 2, p. 26, doi. 10.2979/HYP.1999.14.2.26
- Article
8
- Hastings Center Report, 1995, v. 25, n. 6, p. 32, doi. 10.2307/3527839
- Article
9
- History & Theory, 2011, v. 50, n. 4, p. 117, doi. 10.1111/j.1468-2303.2011.00607.x
- Article
10
- Cracow Studies of Constitutional & Legal History / Krakowskie Studia z Historii Państwa i Prawa, 2023, v. 16, n. 3, p. 283, doi. 10.4467/20844131KS.23.020.18384
- Article
11
- Lua Nova, 2022, n. 117, p. 55, doi. 10.1590/0102-055070/117
- Article
12
- Journal of Social Philosophy, 2006, v. 37, n. 3, p. 423, doi. 10.1111/j.1467-9833.2006.00346.x
- Article
13
- Journal of Social Philosophy, 2002, v. 33, n. 2, p. 297, doi. 10.1111/0047-2786.00010
- Article
14
- Journal of Social Philosophy, 1997, v. 28, n. 3, p. 16, doi. 10.1111/j.1467-9833.1997.tb00385.x
- Article
15
- Revista Cultura Económica, 2011, v. 29, n. 81/82, p. 64
- Article
16
- Economy & Society, 2005, v. 34, n. 3, p. 451, doi. 10.1080/03085140500111915
- Article
17
- Godišnjak Pravnog Fakulteta u Sarajevu, 2010, v. 53, p. 489
- Article
18
- Filosofia UNISINOS, 2017, v. 18, n. 3, p. 146, doi. 10.4013/fsu.2017.183.04
- Bucchile Faggion, Andrea Luisa
- Article
19
- Filosofia UNISINOS, 2011, v. 12, n. 2, p. 148, doi. 10.4013/fsu.2011.122.04
- Article
20
- Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal, 2010, v. 19, n. 2, p. 195
- Article
21
- Tópicos. Revista de Filosofía, 1998, n. 15, p. 31
- Article
22
- Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 1990, v. 26, n. 2, p. 225
- Article
23
- Valparaiso University Law Review, 2017, v. 52, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
24
- Philosophia, 2015, v. 43, n. 3, p. 801, doi. 10.1007/s11406-015-9602-x
- Article
25
- Social Theory & Practice, 2006, v. 32, n. 2, p. 191
- Article
28
- Social Theory & Practice, 1996, v. 22, n. 3, p. 315
- Article
29
- Common Law World Review, 2010, v. 39, n. 1, p. 100, doi. 10.1350/clwr.2010.39.1.0196
- Article
30
- Ethical Theory & Moral Practice, 2011, v. 14, n. 2, p. 185, doi. 10.1007/s10677-010-9236-9
- Article
31
- Ethical Theory & Moral Practice, 2002, v. 5, n. 1, p. 113, doi. 10.1023/A:1014469905337
- Article
32
- Artificial Intelligence & Law, 2015, v. 23, n. 1, p. 43, doi. 10.1007/s10506-015-9164-z
- Article
33
- Revista Opinião Jurídica, 2023, v. 21, n. 36, p. 55, doi. 10.12662/2447-6641oj.v21i36.p55-84.2023
- de Souza Faggion, Vinicius
- Article
34
- European Data Protection Law Review (EDPL), 2017, v. 3, n. 2, p. 160, doi. 10.21552/edpl/2017/2/6
- Article
35
- Universitas Philosophica, 2006, v. 23, n. 47, p. 13
- Article
36
- Espaço Jurídico: Journal of Law, 2021, v. 22, n. 2, p. 455, doi. 10.18593/ejjl.26143
- Plá Coelho, Rosa Julia;
- de Alvarenga Peixoto, Fabio Carvalho
- Article
37
- Journal of the American Philosophical Association, 2019, v. 5, n. 2, p. 158, doi. 10.1017/apa.2018.44
- Article
38
- British Journal of Psychotherapy, 2015, v. 31, n. 4, p. 510, doi. 10.1111/bjp.12171
- Article
39
- Revus: Journal for Constitutional Theory & Philosophy of Law, 2022, v. 48, p. 75
- Article
40
- Revus: Journal for Constitutional Theory & Philosophy of Law, 2021, v. 43, p. 223
- Article
41
- Revus: Journal for Constitutional Theory & Philosophy of Law, 2021, v. 43, p. 113
- Article
42
- Revus: Journal for Constitutional Theory & Philosophy of Law, 2016, v. 28, p. 1, doi. 10.4000/revus.3345
- Article
44
- Oxford Journal of Law & Religion, 2013, v. 2, n. 2, p. 371, doi. 10.1093/ojlr/rws042
- Article
46
- Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 2009, v. 39, n. 2, p. 309, doi. 10.1353/cjp.0.0050
- Article
47
- Utilitas, 2010, v. 22, n. 3, p. 331, doi. 10.1017/S0953820810000233
- Article
48
- Utilitas, 2004, v. 16, n. 3, p. 267, doi. 10.1017/S0953820804001177
- Christofidis, Miriam Cohen
- Article
49
- Utilitas, 2003, v. 15, n. 2, p. 175, doi. 10.1017/S0953820800003939
- Article
50
- Utilitas, 2001, v. 13, n. 1, p. 33, doi. 10.1017/S0953820800002983
- Article