Principiul double jeopardy în jurisprudenţa penală a Curţii Supreme a Statelor Unite ale Americii.
- Published in:
- Criminal Law Writings / Caiete de Drept Penal, 2021, n. 3, p. 9
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Works matching Double jeopardy and the Supreme Court
Results: 35
1
2
State v. Davenport: The Louisiana Supreme Court Ignores Federal Constitutional Double Jeopardy Protections in Favor of Criminal Reprosecution.
- Published in:
- Tulane Law Review, 2015, v. 89, n. 4, p. 909
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
3
Putting the Halper genie back in the bottle: Examining United States v. Ursery in light of Halper...
- Published in:
- Brigham Young University Law Review, 1997, v. 1997, n. 1, p. 235
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
4
SOVEREIGNS' INTERESTS AND DOUBLE JEOPARDY.
- Published in:
- Virginia Law Review, 2024, v. 110, n. 8, p. 1955
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
5
CRIMINAL LAW-Merger of Sentences: The Legislature Says You Can't Hang 'Em Twice; Najera v. State, 214 P.3d 990 (Wyo. 2009).
- Published in:
- Wyoming Law Review, 2012, v. 12, n. 1, p. 141, doi. 10.59643/1942-9916.1272
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
6
Taking the ammunition away from the `war on drugs': A double jeopardy bar to 21 U.S.C....881...
- Published in:
- 1993
- By:
- Publication type:
- Editorial
7
`Reverse Rico' double jeopardy protection under United...
- Published in:
- Brigham Young University Law Review, 1991, v. 1991, n. 2, p. 1107
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
8
ABSTRACTS OF RECENT CASES.
- Published in:
- 1959
- Publication type:
- Abstract
9
Double jeopardy...merger of offenses.
- Published in:
- American Bar Association Journal, 1980, v. 66, n. 6, p. 775
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
10
Justices redefine double jeopardy.
- Published in:
- American Bar Association Journal, 1978, v. 64, n. 8, p. 1221
- Publication type:
- Article
11
Indian's Tribal Conviction No Bar to Federal Indictment.
- Published in:
- American Bar Association Journal, 1978, v. 64, n. 5, p. 746
- Publication type:
- Article
12
Supreme Court Report.
- Published in:
- American Bar Association Journal, 1978, v. 64, n. 1, p. 114
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
13
Supreme Court box score.
- Published in:
- American Bar Association Journal, 1978, v. 64, n. 1, p. 31
- Publication type:
- Article
14
Unresolved Issues in the Law of Double Jeopardy: Waller and Ashe.
- Published in:
- California Law Review, 1970, v. 58, n. 2, p. 391, doi. 10.2307/3479664
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
15
"I WOULD NOT BE CONVICTED BY A JURY OF MY PEERS" (BECAUSE THE JUDGE ERRONEOUSLY GRANTED MY MOTION FOR JUDGMENT OF ACQUITTAL): EVANS v. MICHIGAN AND THE FUTURE OF THE PRE-VERDICT JUDGMENT OF ACQUITTAL.
- Published in:
- University of Toledo Law Review, 2016, v. 47, n. 2, p. 279
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
16
DOUBLE JEOPARDY-INDIANS - COURTS: WHETHER SUCCESSIVE PROSECUTIONS ARISING FROM A SINGLE ACT ARE BARRED BY THE CONSTITUTION'S DOUBLE JEOPARDY CLAUSE: Denezpi v. United States, 141 S. Ct. 1838 (2022).
- Published in:
- North Dakota Law Review, 2023, v. 98, n. 2, p. 301
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
17
Double jeopardy, due process, and evidence from prior acquittals.
- Published in:
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 1990, v. 13, n. 3, p. 1027
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
18
La règle de prohibition des condamnations multiples : réflexions sur ses fondements et ses critères ainsi que sur leur application en droit économique et financier.
- Published in:
- Revue de Droit: Université de Sherbrooke, 2018, v. 48, n. 1/2, p. 31, doi. 10.17118/11143/17916
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
19
Dividing Crime, Multiplying Punishments.
- Published in:
- U.C. Davis Law Review, 2015, v. 48, n. 5, p. 1955
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
20
I'LL TAKE "IMPROPER DECLARATIONS OF MISTRIAL" FOR $2,000.00: APPLYING THE PROTECTION AGAINST DOUBLE JEOPARDY.
- Published in:
- Touro Law Review, 2012, v. 28, n. 3, p. 893
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
21
Successive Prosecutions and Compound Criminal Statutes: A Functional Test.
- Published in:
- Texas Law Review, 1998, v. 77, n. 2, p. 333
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
22
Treaty Double Jeopardy: The OECD Anti-Bribery Convention and the FCPA.
- Published in:
- Ohio State Law Journal, 2012, v. 73, n. 5, p. 1321
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
23
Defining the "Sovereign" in Dual Sovereignty: Does the Protection Against Double Jeopardy Bar Successive Prosecutions in National and International Courts.
- Published in:
- Cornell International Law Journal, 2014, v. 47, n. 3, p. 767
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
24
WHEN DOUBLE JEOPARDY SHOULD BAR RETRIAL IN CASES OF PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT: A CALL FOR BROADER STATE PROTECTIONS.
- Published in:
- Columbia Law Review, 2022, v. 122, n. 1, p. 173
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
25
The “mad” vs. the “bad” Revisited: Managing Predatory Behavior.
- Published in:
- Psychiatric Quarterly, 1999, v. 70, n. 3, p. 221, doi. 10.1023/A:1022051110129
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
26
STATE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW--DOUBLE JEOPARDY--FEDERAL BLOCKBURGER TEST IS USED IN TENNESSEE TO DETERMINE WHETHER THE STATE DOUBLE JEOPARDY PROVISION IS VIOLATED. STATE v . WATKINS, 362 S.W.3D 530 (TENN. 2012).
- Published in:
- Rutgers Law Journal, 2014, v. 44, n. 4, p. 781
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
27
RULING FROM A VACUUM: USING COMMON SENSE, PSYCHOLOGY, AND STATISTICS TO PROVIDE A MORE REALISTIC AND FAIR BASIS FOR DECIDING BLUEFORD V. ARKANSAS.
- Published in:
- Loyola Law Review, 2012, v. 58, n. 3, p. 773
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
28
Constitutional Conflation: The Incorrect Incorporation of Dual Sovereignty into Sixth Amendment Jurisprudence.
- Published in:
- New England Journal on Criminal & Civil Confinement, 2015, v. 41, n. 1, p. 85
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
29
THE MILITARY'S DILUTION OF DOUBLE JEOPARDY: WHY UNITED STATES v. EASTON SHOULD BE OVERTURNED.
- Published in:
- Military Law Review, 2014, v. 219, p. 176
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
30
SEPARATION OF POWERS: INDIANA CONSTITUTIONAL LAW TO THE FOREFRONT--2021-2022.
- Published in:
- Indiana Law Review, 2023, v. 56, n. 4, p. 713, doi. 10.18060/27446
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
31
A Second Look at Double Jeopardy: Hudson v. United States.
- Published in:
- American Journal of Criminal Law, 1998, v. 25, n. 3, p. 631
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
32
EVANS V. MICHIGAN AND THE ABROGATION OF STATE V. KORSEN: A LOOK AT THE EFFECT ON HABEAS CORPUS CLAIMS FOR COLLATERAL RELIEF IN IDAHO.
- Published in:
- Idaho Law Review, 2015, v. 51, n. 2, p. 487
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
33
Rechtsprechungsübersicht.
- Published in:
- Journal of Public Law / Zeitschrift für Öffentliches Recht, 2009, v. 64, n. 4, p. 461, doi. 10.1007/s00708-009-0040-8
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
34
PROSECUTING THE EXONERATED: ACTUAL INNOCENCE AND THE DOUBLE JEOPARDY CLAUSE.
- Published in:
- Stanford Law Review, 2012, v. 64, n. 3, p. 535
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
35
Corporate Criminal Prosecutions and Double Jeopardy.
- Published in:
- Berkeley Business Law Journal, 2019, v. 16, n. 1, p. 205
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article