Dissenting into the Future: The Supreme Court's Dissent in McGirt, UNDRIP, and the Future of Indigenous Land Rights.
- Published in:
- Ecology Law Quarterly, 2021, v. 48, n. 2, p. 729, doi. 10.15779/Z38KD1QM1G
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Works matching Dissents and the Supreme Court
Results: 126
1
2
Don’t Stop Believin’1: An Appreciation of Recent Idaho Supreme Court Dissents and Concurrences.
- Published in:
- Advocate (05154987), 2021, v. 64, n. 2, p. 28
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
3
AN EMPIRICAL STUDY OF DISSENT AT THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, THIRD DEPARTMENT.
- Published in:
- Albany Law Review, 2011, v. 74, n. 2, p. 913
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
4
Dissent Aversion and Sequential Voting in the Brazilian Supreme Court.
- Published in:
- Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 2019, v. 16, n. 4, p. 933, doi. 10.1111/jels.12236
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
5
Dissents from the Bench: A Compilation of Oral Dissents by U.S. Supreme Court Justices.
- Published in:
- Law Library Journal, 2010, v. 102, n. 1, p. 7
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
6
Judging gender: difference and dissent at the Supreme Court of Canada.
- Published in:
- International Journal of the Legal Profession, 2008, v. 15, n. 1/2, p. 57, doi. 10.1080/09695950802439700
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
7
THE GREAT DISSENTS OF THE "LONE DISSENTER": Justice Jesse W. Carter's Twenty Tumultuous Years on the California Supreme Court.
- Published in:
- 2010
- By:
- Publication type:
- Book Review
8
Judicial Disagreement need not be Political: Dissent on the Estonian Supreme Court.
- Published in:
- 2015
- By:
- Publication type:
- Case Study
9
Are Mailing Lists Protected Free Speech? Despite Dissent, the Supreme Court Remains Silent.
- Published in:
- Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 2003, v. 31, n. 2, p. 214, doi. 10.1177/0092070303031002014
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
10
De Quem Divergem os Divergentes: os Votos Vencidos no Supremo Tribunal Federal.
- Published in:
- Direito, Estado e Sociedade, 2015, n. 47, p. 205
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
11
US Supreme Court Denies Review of Idaho's Abolition of Insanity Defense; Three Justices Dissent.
- Published in:
- Developments in Mental Health Law, 2013, v. 32, n. 1, p. 12
- Publication type:
- Article
12
Press and Speech Under Assault: The Early Supreme Court Justices, the Sedition Acts of 1798, and the Campaign Against Dissent.
- Published in:
- 2017
- By:
- Publication type:
- Book Review
13
Dissent and the Supreme Court: Its Role in the Court's History and the Nation's Constitutional Dialogue.
- Published in:
- 2016
- By:
- Publication type:
- Book Review
14
SIGNED OPINIONS, CONCURRENCES, DISSENTS, AND VOTE COUNTS IN THE U.S. SUPREME COURT: BOON OR BANE? (A RESPONSE TO PROFESSORS PENROSE AND SHERRY).
- Published in:
- Akron Law Review, 2019, v. 53, n. 3, p. 525
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
15
Press and Speech under Assault: The Early Supreme Court Justices, the Sedition Act of 1798, and the Campaign against Dissent.
- Published in:
- 2018
- By:
- Publication type:
- Book Review
16
Many Voices, One Court: The Origin and Role of Dissent in the Supreme Court.
- Published in:
- Journal of Supreme Court History, 2011, v. 36, n. 3, p. 193, doi. 10.1353/sch.2011.0002
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
17
'Continuing Custom': Indigenous Inheritance in the Indian Supreme Court's Kishwar v Bihar Dissent.
- Published in:
- Australian Journal of Asian Law, 2024, v. 25, n. 1, p. 23
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
18
Diversity, Dissent and Representation: Lessons From The First Minority Judge in the Israeli Supreme Court.
- Published in:
- Social & Legal Studies, 2022, v. 31, n. 4, p. 603, doi. 10.1177/09646639211043801
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
19
DISSENT, THE BILL OF RIGHTS ACT AND THE SUPREME COURT.
- Published in:
- New Zealand Journal of Public & International Law, 2013, v. 11, n. 1, p. 55
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
20
Press and Speech under Assault: The Early Supreme Court Justices, the Sedition Act of 1798, and the Campaign against Dissent.
- Published in:
- 2018
- By:
- Publication type:
- Book Review
21
Supreme Court consensus and dissent: Estimating the role of the selection screen.
- Published in:
- Public Choice, 2006, v. 127, n. 3/4, p. 367, doi. 10.1007/s11127-006-8290-2
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
22
Supreme Court consensus and dissent: Estimating the role of the selection screen.
- Published in:
- Public Choice, 2005, v. 122, n. 3/4, p. 483, doi. 10.1007/s11127-005-7517-y
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
23
Gender, judicial dissent, and issue salience: the voting behavior of state supreme court justices in sexual harassment cases, 1980–1998
- Published in:
- Social Science Journal, 2003, v. 40, n. 1, p. 79, doi. 10.1016/S0362-3319(02)00260-4
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
24
I Respectfully Dissent: Consensus, Agendas, and Policymaking on the U.S. Supreme Court, 1888–1999.
- Published in:
- Review of Policy Research, 2004, v. 21, n. 3, p. 429, doi. 10.1111/j.1541-1338.2004.00085.x
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
25
Press and Speech under Assault: The Early Supreme Court Justices, the Sedition Act of 1798, and the Campaign against Dissent.
- Published in:
- 2017
- By:
- Publication type:
- Book Review
26
Press and Speech under Assault: The Early Supreme Court Justices, the Sedition Act of 1798, and the Campaign Against Dissent.
- Published in:
- 2018
- By:
- Publication type:
- Book Review
27
An Apologia To Radical Dissent And A Supreme Court Test To Protect It.
- Published in:
- Communication Law & Policy, 2002, v. 7, n. 4, p. 401, doi. 10.1207/S15326926CLP0704_04
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
28
The Supreme Court, Yeshiva Students, and Military Conscription: Judicial Review, the Grunis Dissent, and its Implications for Israeli Democracy and Law.
- Published in:
- Israel Studies, 2018, v. 23, n. 3, p. 197, doi. 10.2979/israelstudies.23.3.24
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
29
DISSENTS OF THE BERCH COURT: EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF UNANIMITY IN A STATE SUPREME COURT.
- Published in:
- Albany Law Review, 2018, v. 82, n. 4, p. 1661
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
30
Does Seniority Matter? The Conditional Influence of State Methods of Judicial Retention.
- Published in:
- Social Science Quarterly (Wiley-Blackwell), 2010, v. 91, n. 1, p. 209, doi. 10.1111/j.1540-6237.2010.00689.x
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
31
'The silent man': From Lochner to Hammer v. Dagenhart, a reevaluation of justice William R. Day.
- Published in:
- Journal of Supreme Court History, 2015, v. 40, n. 1, p. 38, doi. 10.1353/sch.2015.0024
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
32
The Justice Who Changed His Mind: Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., and the Story behind Abrams v. United States.
- Published in:
- Journal of Supreme Court History, 2014, v. 39, n. 1, p. 35, doi. 10.1353/sch.2014.0024
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
33
WHY (AND WHEN) JUDGES DISSENT: A THEORETICAL AND EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS.
- Published in:
- Journal of Legal Analysis, 2011, v. 3, n. 1, p. 101, doi. 10.1093/jla/3.1.101
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
34
Demosprudence, Interactive Federalism, and Twenty Years of Sheff v. O'Neill.
- Published in:
- 2009
- By:
- Publication type:
- Essay
35
JANUS AND THE MOVEMENT DISSENT.
- Published in:
- Boston College Law Review, 2024, v. 65, n. 2, p. 371
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
36
Dissent, Legitimacy, and Public Support for Court Decisions: Evidence from a Survey‐Based Experiment.
- Published in:
- Law & Society Review, 2019, v. 53, n. 2, p. 588, doi. 10.1111/lasr.12402
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
37
State Supreme Court voting behavior: A comparative analysis.
- Published in:
- Social Science Journal, 1992, v. 29, n. 1, p. 31, doi. 10.1016/0362-3319(92)90015-A
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
38
Ends Against the Middle: Measuring Latent Traits when Opposites Respond the Same Way for Antithetical Reasons.
- Published in:
- Political Analysis, 2023, v. 31, n. 4, p. 606, doi. 10.1017/pan.2022.33
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
39
Justice Scalia as Judicial Statesman.
- Published in:
- 2006
- By:
- Publication type:
- Book Review
40
Communicating Imperatives Requires Psychological Closeness But Creates Psychological Distance.
- Published in:
- Journal of Language & Social Psychology, 2020, v. 39, n. 5/6, p. 598, doi. 10.1177/0261927X20902816
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
41
The Future of Greenhouse Gas Emission Regulations: Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection Agency.
- Published in:
- Defense Counsel Journal, 2007, v. 74, n. 3, p. 269
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
42
Comparing Attitudinal and Strategic Accounts of Dissenting Behavior on the U.S. Courts of Appeals.
- Published in:
- American Journal of Political Science (Wiley-Blackwell), 2004, v. 48, n. 1, p. 126, doi. 10.1111/j.0092-5853.2004.00060.x
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
43
Of time and consensual norms in the Supreme Court.
- Published in:
- American Journal of Political Science (Wiley-Blackwell), 1998, v. 42, n. 3, p. 874, doi. 10.2307/2991733
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
44
Kenya's 2017 elections: winner-takes-all politics as usual?
- Published in:
- Journal of Eastern African Studies, 2019, v. 13, n. 2, p. 215, doi. 10.1080/17531055.2019.1594072
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
45
Justice Powell's Garden: The Ciraolo Dissent and Fourth Amendment Protection for Curtilage-Home Privacy.
- Published in:
- San Diego Law Review, 2007, v. 44, n. 3, p. 551
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
46
Marriage Equality and Obergefell's Generational (Not Glucksberg's Traditional) Due Process Clause.
- Published in:
- 2016
- By:
- Publication type:
- Essay
47
BUSCANDO AL "JUEZ MEDIANO": ESTUDIO SOBRE LA FORMACIÓN DE COALICIONES EN LA TERCERA SALA DE LA CORTE SUPREMA.
- Published in:
- Revista de Ciencia Politica, 2018, v. 38, n. 3, p. 485
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
48
SCHOLARS AND JUDGES: REASON AND POWER.
- Published in:
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2000, v. 23, n. 3, p. 807
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
49
SEVERABILITY AS DEREGULATION: THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW DOCTRINE THROUGH AFFORDABLE CARE ACT LITIGATION.
- Published in:
- Charleston Law Review, 2020, v. 15, n. 1, p. 123
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
50
TZADEK, TZADEK TIRDOF - JUSTICE, JUSTICE YOU SHALL PURSUE: ROMER, LAWRENCE, & WINDSOR: A CRITIQUE OF JUSTICE SCALIA'S DISSENTING OPINIONS.
- Published in:
- Cardozo Journal of Law & Gender, 2015, v. 21, n. 2, p. 317
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article