Setting boundaries between science and law: Lessons from Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals...
- Published in:
- Science, Technology & Human Values, 1996, v. 21, n. 2, p. 131, doi. 10.1177/016224399602100201
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Works matching Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals
Results: 297
1
2
THE NOT SO "SWEET SURPRISE": LAWSUITS BLAMING BIG SUGAR FOR OBESITY-RELATED HEALTH CONDITIONS FACE AN UPHILL BATTLE.
- Published in:
- Journal of Law & Health, 2015, v. 28, n. 2, p. 264
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
3
Manning the Daubert Gate: A Defense Primer in Response to Milward v. Acuity Specialty Products.
- Published in:
- Defense Counsel Journal, 2012, v. 79, n. 2, p. 128
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
4
Is there an Expert in the House? Expert Evidence in Insurance Coverage Cases.
- Published in:
- Defense Counsel Journal, 2007, v. 74, n. 4, p. 307
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
5
Alabama's Version of Daubert- A Legislative History.
- Published in:
- Alabama Lawyer, 2013, v. 74, n. 1, p. 44
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
6
EXPERT TESTIMONY ON INTERROGATION AND FALSE CONFESSION.
- Published in:
- UMKC Law Review, 2014, v. 82, n. 3, p. 589
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
7
The Daubert Revolution and the Birth of Modernity: Managing Scientific Evidence in the Age of Science.
- Published in:
- 2013
- By:
- Publication type:
- Essay
8
A Trial Advocacy Postscript to the Daubert Hearing.
- Published in:
- U.C. Davis Law Review, 2013, v. 46, n. 3, p. 931
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
9
Transcript.
- Published in:
- 2013
- By:
- Publication type:
- Conference Paper/Materials
10
Introductions.
- Published in:
- U.C. Davis Law Review, 2013, v. 46, n. 3, p. 737
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
11
ADMISSIBILITY OF EXPERT EVIDENCE TO PROVE CAUSATION IN TOXIC TORTS.
- Published in:
- Tort Trial & Insurance Practice Law Journal, 2017, v. 53, n. 1, p. 139
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
12
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN PRODUCTS LIABILITY.
- Published in:
- Tort Trial & Insurance Practice Law Journal, 2013, v. 49, n. 1, p. 351
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
13
FLEXIBLE STANDARDS, DEFERENTIAL REVIEW: DAUBERT'S LEGACY OF CONFUSION.
- Published in:
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2006, v. 29, n. 3, p. 1085
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
14
Gatekeeping Trends in Reasonable Royalty Cases.
- Published in:
- Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal, 2017, v. 25, n. 1, p. 1
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
15
The Design Professional's Standard of Care After Kumho Tire: From the "Expert With an Opinion" to "Expert Opinion".
- Published in:
- Construction Lawyer, 2008, v. 28, n. 4, p. 30
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
16
FULFILLING DAUBERTS GATEKEEPING MANDATE THROUGH COURT-APPOINTED EXPERTS.
- Published in:
- Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 2016, v. 106, n. 1, p. 35
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
17
Establishing the Standard for a Physician's Patient Diagnosis Using Scientific Evidence: Dealing with the Split of Authority Amongst the Circuit Courts of Appeal.
- Published in:
- BYU Journal of Public Law, 2000, v. 15, n. 1, p. 1
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
18
DAUBERT AND FORENSIC SCIENCE: THE PITFALLS OF LAW ENFORCEMENT CONTROL OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH.
- Published in:
- University of Illinois Law Review, 2011, v. 2011, n. 1, p. 53
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
19
WHAT TO DO ABOUT FEDERAL AGENCY SCIENCE: SOME DOUBTS ABOUT REGULATORY DAUBERT.
- Published in:
- George Mason Law Review, 2015, v. 22, n. 3, p. 549
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
20
TO SERVE AND PROTECT? OFFICERS AS EXPERT WITNESSES IN FEDERAL DRUG PROSECUTIONS.
- Published in:
- George Mason Law Review, 2012, v. 19, n. 2, p. 363
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
21
WHAT TO DO WITH DAUBERT: HOW TO BRING STANDARDS OF RELIABLE SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE TO THE NATIONAL VACCINE INJURY COMPENSATION PROGRAM.
- Published in:
- William & Mary Law Review, 2011, v. 52, n. 4, p. 1319
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
22
THE HIDDEN DAUBERT FACTOR: HOW JUDGES USE ERROR RATES IN ASSESSING SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE.
- Published in:
- Wisconsin Law Review, 2014, v. 2014, n. 6, p. 1063
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
23
UNCERTAINTY AND INFORMED CHOICE: UNMASKING DAUBERT.
- Published in:
- Michigan Law Review, 2005, v. 104, n. 2, p. 257
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
24
Applying Daubert Inconsistently?
- Published in:
- Brooklyn Law Review, 2010, v. 75, n. 4, p. 1367
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
25
Scientific Evidence as Foreign Law.
- Published in:
- Brooklyn Law Review, 2010, v. 75, n. 4, p. 1095
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
26
PAUL GIANNELLI'S SCHOLARSHIP OF MEASURED WISDOM, SOPHISTICATION, AND SIGNIFICANCE, AND A MAN OF DILIGENCE, HUMOR, AND GRACIOUSNESS.
- Published in:
- Case Western Reserve Law Review, 2018, v. 68, n. 3, p. 805
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
27
A SHORT PRIMER ON THE ADMISSIBILITY OF FORENSIC SCIENCE EVIDENCE IN TENNESSEE: A CHECKLIST.
- Published in:
- Tennessee Journal of Law & Policy, 2010, v. 6, n. 2, p. 161
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
28
Daubert and Qualification of the Appraisal Expert Witness.
- Published in:
- Appraisal Journal, 2010, v. 78, n. 3, p. 283
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
29
In the Best Interests of Children: What Family Law Attorneys Should Know about Domestic Violence.
- Published in:
- Journal of the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers, 2016, v. 28, n. 2, p. 427
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
30
Forensic Experts and Family Courts: Science or Privilege-by-License?
- Published in:
- Journal of the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers, 2016, v. 28, n. 2, p. 521
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
31
Doctoring the Testimony: Treating Physicians, Rule 26, and the Challenges of Causation Testimony.
- Published in:
- Review of Litigation, 2014, v. 33, n. 2, p. 249
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
32
Rigorous Analysis of the Class Certification Expert: The Roles of Daubert and the Defendant's Proof.
- Published in:
- Review of Litigation, 2008, v. 28, n. 1, p. 71
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
33
Physicians at the Gates of Daubert: A Look at the Admissibility of Differential Diagnosis Testimony to Show External Causation in Toxic Tort Litigation.
- Published in:
- Review of Litigation, 2007, v. 26, n. 3, p. 739
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
34
The history of Daubert and Its Effect on Toxic Tort Class Action Certification.
- Published in:
- Review of Litigation, 2003, v. 22, n. 1, p. 181
- Publication type:
- Article
35
Valuing Litigation in Bankruptcy: The Use of Expert Witnesses to Testify About the Merits and Value of Litigation Claims.
- Published in:
- American Bankruptcy Law Journal, 2020, v. 94, n. 1, p. 155
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
36
COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS AND THE PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE: CAN THEY BE RECONCILED?
- Published in:
- Michigan State Law Review, 2013, v. 2013, n. 3, p. 771
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
37
Product Liability.
- Published in:
- Mercer Law Review, 2013, v. 65, n. 1, p. 221
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
38
Evidence.
- Published in:
- Mercer Law Review, 2011, v. 62, n. 4, p. 1163
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
39
THE COURTROOM TURNED CLASSROOM: A MODEL PROCEDURE FOR EDUCATING THE GATEKEEPERS OF EXPERT EVIDENCE IN COMPLEX TOXIC TORT CASES.
- Published in:
- Cardozo Law Review, 2019, v. 40, n. 5, p. 2405
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
40
FRAMED BY FORENSICS: FULFILLING DAUBERT'S GATEKEEPING FUNCTION BY SEGREGATING SCIENCE FROM THE ADVERSARIAL MODEL.
- Published in:
- Cardozo Law Review, 2018, v. 39, n. 5, p. 1947
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
41
Expertise, Lab Lit, And The Fantasy Of Science Free From Economics.
- Published in:
- Cardozo Law Review, 2012, v. 33, n. 6, p. 2471
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
42
RADICALLY REIMAGINING FORENSIC EVIDENCE.
- Published in:
- Alabama Law Review, 2022, v. 73, n. 4, p. 879
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
43
BRAIN FINGERPRINTING, SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE, AND DAUBERT: A CAUTIONARY LESSON FROM INDIA.
- Published in:
- Jurimetrics: The Journal of Law, Science & Technology, 2011, v. 51, n. 3, p. 293
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
44
USING DAUBERT TO EVALUATE EVIDENCE-BASED SENTENCING.
- Published in:
- Cornell Law Review, 2018, v. 103, n. 3, p. 723
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
45
Daubert Rises: The (Re)applicability of the Daubert Factors to the Scope of Forensics Testimony.
- Published in:
- Minnesota Law Review, 2012, v. 96, n. 4, p. 1581
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
46
THE FIRST TWENTY YEARS OF RULE OF EVIDENCE 702 AND THE CURRENT STATE OF EXPERT TESTIMONY IN INDIANA.
- Published in:
- Indiana Law Review, 2015, v. 48, n. 4, p. 1115, doi. 10.18060/4806.0035
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
47
Genomic Test Results and the Courtroom: The Roles of Experts and Expert Testimony.
- Published in:
- Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 2016, v. 44, n. 1, p. 205, doi. 10.1177/1073110516644211
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
48
MISSOURI ADOPTS DAUBERT: SEA CHANGE OR RIPPLE ON THE POND?
- Published in:
- Journal of the Missouri Bar, 2017, v. 73, n. 6, p. 304
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
49
Representation and Re-Presentation in Litigation Science.
- Published in:
- Environmental Health Perspectives, 2008, v. 116, n. 1, p. 123, doi. 10.1289/ehp.9976
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
50
Litigation-Generated Science: Why Should We Care?
- Published in:
- Environmental Health Perspectives, 2008, v. 116, n. 1, p. 117, doi. 10.1289/ehp.9987
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article