WHOSE LINE IS IT ANYWAY?: A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY OF THE SUPREME COURT'S SPUT ANALYSIS OF § 2254(D)(1) SINCE 2000.
- Published in:
- Seton Hall Law Review, 2011, v. 41, n. 4, p. 1599
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Works matching DE "WILLIAMS v. Taylor (Supreme Court case)"
Results: 4
1
2
The Voice of Reason—Why Recent Judicial Interpretations of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act's Restrictions on Habeas Corpus Are Wrong.
- Published in:
- Seattle University Law Review, 2013, v. 37, n. 1, p. 55
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
3
Bypassing Habeas: The Right to Effective Assistance Requires Earlier Supreme Court Intervention in Cases of Attorney Incompetence.
- Published in:
- Federal Sentencing Reporter (University of California Press), 2012, v. 25, n. 2, p. 110, doi. 10.1525/fsr.2012.25.2.110
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
4
"It's Like Deja Vu All Over Again": Williams v. Taylor, Wiggins v. Smith, Rompilla v. Beard and a (Partial) Return to the Guidelines Approach to the Effective Assistance of Counsel.
- Published in:
- American Journal of Criminal Law, 2007, v. 34, n. 2, p. 127
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article