Rogues to Catch a Rogue: Materiality and the Implied False Certification Theory in a Post-Escobar World.Published in:Review of Litigation, 2019, v. 39, n. 1, p. 97By:Hocter, Edward L.Publication type:Article
MATERIAL OR LUCRATIVE? WHY CONTINUED PAYMENTS BY THE GOVERNMENT TO A FUNDED ENTITY WAIVES THE GOVERNMENT'S RIGHT TO USE THE FALSE CLAIMS ACT AGAINST IT.Published in:Houston Law Review, 2020, v. 58, n. 1, p. 237By:Bridges, BaileyPublication type:Article
THREE WAYS ESCOBAR LEVELED THE PLAYING FIELD IN FCA CASES.Published in:Public Contract Law Journal, 2021, v. 51, n. 1, p. 57By:Van Allen, Marc A.Publication type:Article
JOHNSON V. UNIVERSAL HEALTH SERVICES, INC. EMPHASIZES THAT A WRONGFUL DEATH CLAIMANT MUST BE EITHER APPOINTED AS THE INJURED PARTY'S REPRESENTATIVE OR MUST BE THE INJURED PARTY'S ONLY HEIR.Published in:University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review, 2023, v. 45, n. 4, p. 845By:Lovett, MeghanPublication type:Article
Supreme Court to Consider FCA "Implied Certification" Theory.Published in:Journal of Health Care Compliance, 2016, v. 18, n. 2, p. 39By:COHEN, ALLISONPublication type:Article