The New World of Agency Adjudication.
- Published in:
- California Law Review, 2019, v. 107, n. 1, p. 141, doi. 10.15779/Z38Q23R09S
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Works matching DE "UNITED States. Patent Trial %26 Appeal Board"
Results: 50
1
2
INTER PARTES REVIEW AND FEDERAL LITIGATION: PARALLEL PROCEEDINGS AND INCONSISTENT RESULTS.
- Published in:
- St. John's Law Review, 2016, v. 90, n. 4, p. 1093
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
3
INSTITUTION DENIED: THE EVOLUTION OF DISCRETIONARY DENIALS OF INTER PARTES REVIEW UNDER 35 U.S.C. § 314(A) SINCE APPLE INC. V. FINTIV, INC.
- Published in:
- American University Law Review, 2021, v. 71, n. 2, p. 741
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
4
2018 PATENT LAW DECISIONS OF THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT.
- Published in:
- American University Law Review, 2019, v. 68, n. 4, p. 1263
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
5
NFC TECHNOLOGY LLC V. HTC AMERICA, INC.: JUDGE BRYSON'S SITTING-BY-DESIGNATION GUIDE TO SECURING STAYS IN LIGHT OF INTER PARTES REVIEWS.
- Published in:
- 2016
- By:
- Publication type:
- Essay
6
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY.
- Published in:
- Bench & Bar of Minnesota, 2021, v. 78, n. 10, p. 39
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
7
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY.
- Published in:
- Bench & Bar of Minnesota, 2021, v. 78, n. 7, p. 37
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
8
EXPANDING THE PATENT OFFICE'S REGULATORY FOOTPRINT: A PROPOSAL FOR REIMBURSING INVALIDITY CHALLENGES.
- Published in:
- Denver Law Review, 2019, v. 96, n. 3, p. 441
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
9
Cuozzo Speed Technologies and Halo Electronics: The U.S. Supreme Court Decides Two Patent Cases in 2016, Upholding a Section of the America Invents Act and Respecting Established Patent Principles.
- Published in:
- Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal, 2017, v. 25, n. 1, p. 143
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
10
A Nonobvious Comparison: Nonobviousness Decisions at the PTAB and in the Federal Courts.
- Published in:
- Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal, 2016, v. 24, n. 3, p. 403
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
11
Fee Shifting for PTAB Proceedings.
- Published in:
- Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal, 2016, v. 24, n. 3, p. 367
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
12
The Patent Trial and Appeal Board's Evolving Impact on Claim Construction.
- Published in:
- Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal, 2016, v. 24, n. 3, p. 301
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
13
Inter Partes Review: A New Paradigm in Patent Litigation.
- Published in:
- Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal, 2015, v. 23, n. 2, p. 113
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
14
The Patent Trial and Appeals Board: A Target for Prescription Drug Patent Reform?
- Published in:
- 2024
- By:
- Publication type:
- Opinion
15
BLURRING THE BOUNDARIES: HOW THE ADDITIONAL GROUNDS FOR POST-GRANT REVIEW IN THE AMERICA INVENTS ACT RAISE ISSUES WITH SEPARATION OF POWERS AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE ACT.
- Published in:
- University of Dayton Law Review, 2013, v. 39, n. 1, p. 112
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
16
APPOINTMENTS AND ILLEGAL ADJUDICATION: THE AMERICA INVENTS ACT THROUGH A CONSTITUTIONAL LENS.
- Published in:
- George Mason Law Review, 2018, v. 26, n. 1, p. 26
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
17
RED TOUCHES BLACK: THE FIRST APPLICATION OF MAKER'S MARK AND LOUBOUTIN IN THE CONTEXT OF COLOR TRADEMARKS.
- Published in:
- American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law, 2014, v. 22, n. 4, p. 981
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
18
A CLOSER LOOK AT THE PTAB OPERATION.
- Published in:
- Southern California Law Review, 2022, v. 95, n. 3, p. 693
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
19
Undefined "Ground": Form or Substance in PTO Estoppel.
- Published in:
- University of Chicago Law Review, 2023, v. 90, n. 8, p. 2173
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
20
Drugmakers' Unwelcome Surprise.
- Published in:
- Regulation, 2015, v. 38, n. 2, p. 6
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
21
BECAUSE I SAID SO: THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, THE PTAB, AND THE PROBLEM WITH RULE 36 AFFIRMANCES.
- Published in:
- Case Western Reserve Law Review, 2018, v. 69, n. 1, p. 247
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
22
HATCH-WAXMAN PATENT LITIGATION AND INTER PARTES REVIEW: A NEW SORT OF COMPETITION.
- Published in:
- Alabama Law Review, 2017, v. 69, n. 1, p. 59
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
23
TREATMENT OF PTAB CLAIM CONSTRUCTION DECISIONS: ASPIRING TO CONSISTENCY AND PREDICTABILITY.
- Published in:
- Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2017, v. 32, p. 315, doi. 10.15779/Z38TD9N78M
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
24
WILLIAMSON V. CITRIX ONLINE: A FUNDAMENTAL SHIFT AND RETURN TO FORM IN MEANS-PLUS-FUNCTION INTERPRETATION.
- Published in:
- Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2016, v. 31, p. 687, doi. 10.15779/Z38ZZ8M
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
25
Standing Up to Bad Patents: Allowing Non-Infringing Direct Competitors to Satisfy the Article III Standing Requirements Appealing an Adverse Inter Partes Review Decision to the Federal Circuit.
- Published in:
- Minnesota Law Review, 2020, v. 105, n. 2, p. 961
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
26
Reimagining Finality in Parallel Patent Proceedings.
- Published in:
- 2016
- By:
- Publication type:
- Opinion
27
POST-ARTHREX OFFICER INFERIORITY: COMPLEX.
- Published in:
- Journal of Science & Technology Law, 2023, v. 29, n. 1, p. 85
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
28
TRIBAL SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY AS A DEFENSE AT THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD? OR A VIOLATION OF U.S. ANTITRUST LAWS?
- Published in:
- Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review, 2019, v. 23, n. 1, p. 57
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
29
INTERPRETATION, REMEDY, AND THE RULE OF LAW: WHY COURTS SHOULD HAVE THE COURAGE OF THEIR CONSTITUTIONAL CONVICTIONS.
- Published in:
- Administrative Law Review, 2022, v. 74, n. 4, p. 657
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
30
PREJUDICIAL OR PROBATIVE: DETERMINING THE ADMISSIBILITY OF DECISIONS IN INTER PARTES REVIEW PROCEEDINGS.
- Published in:
- Boston University Law Review, 2018, v. 98, n. 1, p. 263
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
31
THROWING DISCRETION TO THE WIND: DISCRETIONARY DENIALS IN INSTITUTING INTER PARTES REVIEW UNDER THE NHK-FINTIV FRAMEWORK.
- Published in:
- Washington University Journal of Law & Policy, 2022, v. 69, p. 341
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
32
TRIBUTE TO JUDGE PAULINE NEWMAN.
- Published in:
- New York University Annual Survey of American Law, 2019, v. 74, n. 1, p. 7
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
33
Should the Federal Circuit Stand Down on Standing?
- Published in:
- Missouri Law Review, 2023, v. 88, n. 1, p. 291
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
34
The Unlikely Duo That Shocked the Intellectual Property World and Why the Supreme Court Was the Chosen One to Restore Balance.
- Published in:
- University of Miami Law Review, 2019, v. 73, n. 3, p. 955
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
35
LET'S BE REASONABLE! THE BROADEST REASONABLE INTERPRETATION IN THE PTAB.
- Published in:
- Journal of Intellectual Property & Entertainment Law, 2016, v. 5, n. 2, p. 406
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
36
A Distinction Without a Difference: Convergence in Claim Construction Standards.
- Published in:
- Vanderbilt Law Review, 2017, v. 70, n. 6, p. 1071
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
37
A Distinction Without a Difference: Convergence in Claim Construction Standards.
- Published in:
- Vanderbilt Law Review, 2017, v. 70, n. 3, p. 1071
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
38
Reviewing St. Regis: Unresolved Issues at the Intersection of Tribal Sovereign Immunity and Patent Law.
- Published in:
- Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law, 2019, v. 21, n. 4, p. 1125
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
39
WRONGLY AFFIRMED WITHOUT OPINION.
- Published in:
- Wake Forest Law Review, 2017, v. 52, n. 4, p. 561
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
40
THE "BROADEST REASONABLE INTERPRETATION" AND APPLYING ISSUE PRECLUSION TO ADMINISTRATIVE PATENT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION.
- Published in:
- Michigan Law Review, 2018, v. 117, n. 2, p. 349, doi. 10.36644/mlr.117.2.broadest
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
41
THE EFFECT OF ARBITRATION AGREEMENTS ON THE AMERICA INVENTS ACT'S INTER PARTES REVIEW PROCEDURE.
- Published in:
- Columbia Law Review, 2018, v. 118, n. 1, p. 83
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
42
The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) and the Supreme Court: How Oil States Threatens to Reverse Congressional Efforts to Reform Patent Litigation.
- Published in:
- Advocate (05154987), 2017, v. 60, n. 11/12, p. 22
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
43
PATENT GROUPTHINK UNRAVELS.
- Published in:
- Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, 2021, v. 34, n. 2, p. 419
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
44
PATENT RIGHTS IN A CLIMATE OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS SKEPTICISM.
- Published in:
- Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, 2016, v. 30, n. 1, p. 103
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
45
LEAVING THE EVERGREENING PROBLEM TO THE PATENT EXPERTS - THE USPTO, THE PTAB, AND THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT.
- Published in:
- Indiana Law Review, 2021, v. 54, n. 1, p. 195, doi. 10.18060/25507
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
46
A FREE BITE AT THE APPLE: HOW FLAWED STATUTORY DRAFTING HAS UNDERMINED THE PURPOSE OF THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD.
- Published in:
- Duke Law Journal, 2018, v. 67, n. 7, p. 1579
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
47
PATENT EXCEPTIONALISM WITH PRESIDENTIAL ADVICE AND CONSENT.
- Published in:
- 2016
- By:
- Publication type:
- Speech
48
POST INVALIDATION REISSUE: AN UNDERUSED TOOL In THE PATENT ARSENAL?
- Published in:
- IDEA: The Intellectual Property Law Review, 2017, v. 57, n. 1, p. 1
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
49
CONFIRMATION BIAS AND THE DUE PROCESS OF INTER PARTES REVIEW.
- Published in:
- IDEA: The Intellectual Property Law Review, 2017, v. 57, n. 1, p. 29
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
50
EFFECT OF THE REGULATORY ACCOUNTABILITY ACT OF 2017 ON INTER PARTES REVIEW: A LOOK AT TELEBRANDS CORP., V. TINNUS ENTERS., LLC.
- Published in:
- Albany Law Review, 2018, v. 82, n. 1, p. 349
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article