Works matching DE "UNITED States. National Security Agency"
4
- Critical Discourse Studies, 2017, v. 14, n. 4, p. 402, doi. 10.1080/17405904.2017.1320296
- Article
5
- Chinese Journal of International Law, 2019, v. 18, n. 4, p. 751, doi. 10.1093/chinesejil/jmz037
- Article
6
- National Security Law Journal, 2023, v. 11, n. 1, p. 98
- Article
7
- ISSA Journal, 2018, v. 16, n. 1, p. 7
- Article
8
- ISSA Journal, 2017, v. 15, n. 11, p. 5
- Article
9
- ISSA Journal, 2017, v. 15, n. 10, p. 35
- Article
10
- ISSA Journal, 2017, v. 15, n. 10, p. 23
- Article
11
- ISSA Journal, 2016, v. 14, n. 2, p. 11
- Article
13
- Military Operations Research, 2011, v. 16, n. 4, p. 41, doi. 10.5711/1082598316441
- Parnell, Gregory S.;
- Buckley, Mark;
- Ernesto, Andrew;
- McGrath, Daniel;
- Miller, Maria
- Article
14
- Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 2012, v. 41, n. 2, p. 107, doi. 10.2190/ET.41.2.b
- Adamo-Villani, Nicoletta;
- Oania, Marcus;
- Cooper, Stephen
- Article
15
- Columbia Law Review, 2015, v. 115, n. 2, p. 211
- Article
16
- Public Manager, 2017, p. 1
- Okurowski, Mary Ellen;
- Haarmann, Henk J.
- Article
17
- Public Manager, 2012, p. 53
- Zasloff, Mindy;
- Okurowski, Mary Ellen
- Article
18
- International Journal of Law & Information Technology, 2017, v. 25, n. 3, p. 213, doi. 10.1093/ijlit/eax010
- Article
19
- American Scholar, 2013, v. 82, n. 4, p. 20
- Article
20
- Juniata Voices, 2015, v. 15, p. 49
- Article
21
- Harvard Law & Policy Review, 2016, v. 10, n. 1, p. 255
- Article
22
- Harvard Law & Policy Review, 2014, v. 8, n. 2, p. 281
- Article
24
- Washington University Global Studies Law Review, 2015, v. 14, n. 4, p. 799
- Article
25
- Cardozo Law Review, 2014, v. 36, n. 1, p. 119
- Article
26
- SAIS Review of International Affairs, 2021, v. 41, n. 2, p. 143, doi. 10.1353/sais.2021.0023
- Article
27
- Houston Journal of International Law, 2015, v. 37, n. 2, p. 543
- Article
29
- Journal of Counterterrorism & Homeland Security International, 2014, v. 20, n. 1, p. 28
- Article
30
- Journal of Counterterrorism & Homeland Security International, 2014, v. 20, n. 1, p. 10
- Article
31
- Written Communication, 2021, v. 38, n. 3, p. 380, doi. 10.1177/07410883211007870
- Article
32
- World Affairs, 2014, v. 176, n. 5, p. 13
- Article
33
- World Affairs, 2013, v. 176, n. 4, p. 57
- Article
34
- Multimedia Tools & Applications, 2021, v. 80, n. 11, p. 17067, doi. 10.1007/s11042-020-09625-8
- Sleem, Lama;
- Couturier, Raphaël
- Article
36
- Law & Contemporary Problems, 1976, v. 40, n. 3, p. 106, doi. 10.2307/1191394
- Article
37
- Journal of Common Market Studies, 2018, v. 56, n. 4, p. 751, doi. 10.1111/jcms.12634
- Dimitrova, Anna;
- Brkan, Maja
- Article
38
- Harvard National Security Journal, 2022, v. 13, n. 2, p. 224
- Kostyuk, Nadiya;
- Landau, Susan
- Article
39
- Harvard National Security Journal, 2020, v. 11, n. 3, p. 308
- Landau, Susan;
- Lubin, Asaf
- Article
40
- Harvard National Security Journal, 2020, v. 11, n. 3, p. 308
- Landau, Susan;
- Lubin, Asaf
- Article
41
- Harvard National Security Journal, 2015, v. 6, n. 1, p. 112
- Article
42
- National Social Science Journal, 2017, v. 48, n. 2, p. 9
- Burum, Sue;
- Holmes, Georgia
- Article
43
- Anthropology Today, 2025, v. 41, n. 2, p. 7, doi. 10.1111/1467-8322.12952
- Article
44
- Revista Seqüência, 2014, v. 35, n. 69, p. 281, doi. 10.5007/2177-7055.2014v35n69p281
- Pilati, José Isaac;
- Cancelier de Olivo, Mikhail Vieira
- Article
45
- IEEE Internet Computing, 2014, v. 18, n. 5, p. 65, doi. 10.1109/MIC.2014.98
- Article
46
- Journalism Practice, 2017, v. 11, n. 6, p. 665, doi. 10.1080/17512786.2016.1179587
- Article
47
- Ethical Space: The International Journal of Communication Ethics, 2014, v. 11, n. 1/2, p. 9
- Article
48
- Oklahoma City University Law Review, 2018, v. 43, n. 2, p. 101
- Article
49
- Faulkner Law Review, 2016, v. 7, n. 2, p. 287
- Article
50
- Faulkner Law Review, 2014, v. 5, n. 2, p. 309
- Article