Works matching DE "UNITED States. Defense of Marriage Act"
1
- Social Forces, 2024, v. 102, n. 3, p. 1134, doi. 10.1093/sf/soad108
- Hoffmann, Nathan I;
- Velasco, Kristopher
- Article
2
- 2013
- Sabatini, Mary;
- Dizon, Don
- Letter
3
- Review of Law & Social Change, 2013, v. 37, n. 2, p. 457
- Article
4
- Review of Law & Social Change, 2013, v. 37, n. 1, p. 187
- STEWART, THERESE M.;
- LEE, MOLLIE M.
- Article
6
- Oxford Journal of Law & Religion, 2013, v. 2, n. 2, p. 469, doi. 10.1093/ojlr/rwt038
- Thayer, Donlu;
- Worley, Michael
- Article
7
- California Law Review, 2014, v. 102, n. 4, p. 971
- Article
8
- Modern American, 2013, v. 9, n. 1, p. 19
- Article
9
- Modern American, 2013, v. 9, n. 1, p. 8
- Article
10
- NAELA Journal, 2014, v. 10, n. 1, p. 121
- Schneider, Stephanie L.;
- Pietrzak, Lara
- Article
12
- U.C. Davis Law Review, 2014, v. 48, n. 2, p. 655
- Smith, Catherine E.;
- Pollvogt, Susannah W.
- Article
13
- U.C. Davis Law Review, 2014, v. 48, n. 2, p. 675
- Article
14
- U.C. Davis Law Review, 2014, v. 48, n. 2, p. 623
- Article
15
- U.C. Davis Law Review, 2014, v. 48, n. 2, p. 505
- Article
16
- U.C. Davis Law Review, 2014, v. 48, n. 1, p. 419
- Article
17
- U.C. Davis Law Review, 2014, v. 47, n. 5, p. 1453
- Article
18
- American University Law Review, 2012, v. 61, n. 6, p. 1825
- Article
19
- San Diego Law Review, 2023, v. 60, n. 1, p. 45
- Article
20
- Poroi: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Rhetorical Analysis & Invention, 2012, v. 8, n. 2, p. 1, doi. 10.13008/2151-2957.1144
- Article
21
- Forum (2194-6183), 2019, v. 17, n. 1, p. 97, doi. 10.1515/for-2019-0002
- Article
22
- Illinois Public Employee Relations Report, 2014, n. 1, p. 1
- Malahowski, Andrew;
- Nowak, Jeff
- Article
23
- Bench & Bar of Minnesota, 2023, v. 80, n. 3, p. 26
- BURTON, CONNOR;
- YOST, MATT
- Article
24
- Duke Journal of Gender Law & Policy, 2013, v. 21, n. 1, p. 177
- Article
25
- Duke Journal of Gender Law & Policy, 2010, v. 17, n. 2, p. 399
- Article
26
- Veterinary Team Brief, 2013, p. 16
- Article
27
- Cardozo Journal of Law & Gender, 2015, v. 21, n. 1, p. 308
- Article
30
- Elon Law Review, 2014, v. 6, n. 2, p. 387
- Article
31
- Elon Law Review, 2014, v. 6, n. 2, p. 375
- Article
32
- Elon Law Review, 2014, v. 6, n. 2, p. 323
- Article
33
- Elon Law Review, 2014, v. 6, n. 2, p. 269
- Article
34
- Elon Law Review, 2014, v. 6, n. 2, p. 251
- Article
35
- Elon Law Review, 2014, v. 6, n. 1, p. 173
- Article
36
- Journal of Financial Service Professionals, 2013, v. 67, n. 5, p. 64
- Aalberts, Robert J.;
- Biggart, Timothy B.;
- Harden, J. William
- Article
37
- Journal of Financial Service Professionals, 2011, v. 65, n. 5, p. 55
- Article
38
- Australasian Journal of American Studies, 2015, v. 34, n. 1, p. 43
- Article
39
- University of Memphis Law Review, 2014, v. 45, n. 2, p. 281
- LAMPARELLO, ADAM;
- MACLEAN, CHARLES E.
- Article
40
- Kansas Law Review, 2014, v. 63, p. 103
- Article
41
- Kansas Law Review, 2013, v. 61, p. 103
- Article
42
- George Mason University Civil Rights Law Journal, 2014, v. 24, n. 3, p. 263
- Article
43
- George Mason Law Review, 2014, v. 21, n. 2, p. 329
- Article
44
- George Mason Law Review, 2013, v. 20, n. 2, p. 485
- Article
45
- Review of Banking & Financial Law, 2014, v. 33, n. 2, p. 462
- Article
46
- American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law, 2013, v. 21, n. 4, p. 705
- Article
47
- American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law, 2011, v. 19, n. 3, p. 959
- KUBASEK, NANCY;
- GLASS, CHRISTY;
- COOK, KATE
- Article
48
- William & Mary Law Review, 2014, v. 55, n. 6, p. 2171
- Article
49
- William & Mary Law Review, 2014, v. 55, n. 5, p. 1719
- Article
50
- Creighton Law Review, 2014, v. 47, n. 2, p. 261
- Article