Works matching DE "UNITED States. Declaration of Independence"
1
- Yale Law Journal, 2012, v. 121, n. 5, p. 1236
- Article
2
- Creighton Law Review, 2020, v. 54, n. 1, p. 19
- Article
3
- Modern Age, 2007, v. 49, n. 4, p. 476
- Article
4
- Opera Historica, 2020, n. 1, p. 72, doi. 10.32725/oph.2020.005
- Article
5
- Maryland Law Review, 2021, v. 81, n. 1, p. 217
- Article
6
- Maryland Law Review, 2012, v. 71, n. 4, p. 1052
- Torres, Gerald;
- Guinier, Lani
- Article
7
- Maryland Law Review, 2011, v. 71, n. 1, p. 229
- Article
8
- 2006
- Enciso, A. González;
- Bowen, H. V.
- Proceeding
9
- Review of Social & Economic Issues, 2017, n. 4, p. 96
- Article
10
- Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, 2009, v. 34, n. 3, p. 299, doi. 10.1177/030437540903400304
- Article
11
- Israel Law Review (Cambridge University Press), 2023, v. 56, n. 3, p. 320, doi. 10.1017/S0021223723000250
- Article
12
- Journal of the Early Republic, 2024, v. 44, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
16
- Nevada Law Journal, 2018, v. 19, n. 2, p. 447
- Article
17
- Journal of Contemporary Legal Issues, 2022, v. 23, n. 2, p. 307
- LIPPERT-RASMUSSEN, KASPER
- Article
18
- Southern California Law Review, 2016, v. 89, n. 3, p. 637
- Article
19
- Southern California Law Review, 2016, v. 89, n. 3, p. 619
- Article
20
- Southern California Law Review, 2016, v. 89, n. 3, p. 601
- Article
21
- Southern California Law Review, 2016, v. 89, n. 3, p. 399
- BALKIN, JACK M.;
- LEVINSON, SANFORD
- Article
22
- Southern California Law Review, 2016, v. 89, n. 3, p. 575
- Article
23
- Southern California Law Review, 2016, v. 89, n. 3, p. 509
- Article
24
- Southern California Law Review, 2016, v. 89, n. 3, p. 485
- Article
25
- Southern California Law Review, 2016, v. 89, n. 3, p. 457
- Article
26
- Southern California Law Review, 2016, v. 89, n. 3, p. 427
- Article
27
- Southern California Law Review, 2016, v. 89, n. 3, p. 541
- Article
28
- Southern California Law Review, 2016, v. 89, n. 3, p. 369
- Article
29
- Southern California Law Review, 2016, v. 89, n. 3, p. 359
- Article
30
- Proceedings of the American Antiquarian Society (1880 to 2008), 1928, v. 38, n. 1, p. 51
- Article
31
- Proceedings of the American Antiquarian Society (1880 to 2008), 1925, v. 35, n. 2, p. 227
- Article
32
- 1925
- Conference Paper/Materials
33
- Law & History Review, 2021, v. 39, n. 2, p. 321, doi. 10.1017/S0738248020000528
- Article
35
- Law & History Review, 2017, v. 35, n. 3, p. 563, doi. 10.1017/S0738248017000268
- Article
36
- Law & History Review, 2017, v. 35, n. 3, p. v, doi. 10.1017/S0738248017000220
- Article
38
- Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 1989, v. 19, n. 1, p. 41, doi. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubjof.a037772
- Article
39
- Michigan Quarterly Review, 2022, v. 61, n. 4, p. 620
- Article
40
- Law & Contemporary Problems, 2022, v. 85, n. 3, p. 69
- Article
42
- Historian, 1995, v. 57, n. 4, p. 859, doi. 10.1111/j.1540-6563.1995.tb01370.x
- Article
43
- History Today, 2015, v. 65, n. 7, p. 31
- Article
45
- Public Voices, 2014, v. 14, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
46
- Oklahoma City University Law Review, 2015, v. 40, p. 203
- Article
48
- North Dakota Law Review, 2020, v. 95, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
49
- Early American Studies, An Interdisciplinary Journal, 2022, v. 20, n. 3, p. 440, doi. 10.1353/eam.2022.0013
- DE APODACA, ROBERTO OSCAR FLORES
- Article
50
- Early American Studies, An Interdisciplinary Journal, 2018, v. 16, n. 4, p. 728
- Article