Works matching DE "UNITED States. Court of Appeals (Federal Circuit)"

Results: 427

EXPERTISE, IDEOLOGY, AND DISSENT.

Published in:

American University Law Review, 2025, v. 74, n. 4, p. 877

By:

GUGLIUZZA, PAUL R.;
NASH, JONATHAN REMY;
RANTANEN, JASON

Publication type:

Article

UNDERSTANDING NAUTILUS’S REASONABLE-CERTAINTY STANDARD: REQUIREMENTS FOR LINGUISTIC AND PHYSICAL DEFINITENESS OF PATENT CLAIMS.

Published in:

Michigan Law Review, 2017, v. 116, n. 2, p. 329, doi. 10.36644/mlr.116.2.understanding

By:

Fox, Gary M.

Publication type:

Article

PRACTICE MAKES PERFECT? AN EMPIRICAL STUDY OF CLAIM CONSTRUCTION REVERSAL RATES IN PATENT CASES.

Published in:

Michigan Law Review, 2008, v. 107, n. 2, p. 223

By:

Schwartz, David L.

Publication type:

Article

EXCLUSION CONFUSION? A DEFENSE OF THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT'S SPECIFIC EXCLUSION JURISPRUDENCE.

Published in:

Michigan Law Review, 2007, v. 106, n. 2, p. 347

By:

Magic, Peter Curtis

Publication type:

Article

The Federal Question in Patent-License Cases.

Published in:

Indiana Law Journal, 2015, v. 90, n. 2, p. 659

By:

RINEHART, AMELIA SMITH

Publication type:

Article

Retroactivity at the Federal Circuit.

Published in:

Indiana Law Journal, 2014, v. 89, n. 4, p. 1547

By:

SCHWARTZ, DAVID L.

Publication type:

Article

THE ONLY CERTAINTY IS UNCERTAINTY: PATENT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT.

Published in:

Journal of Technology Law & Policy, 2016, v. 21, n. 2, p. 243

By:

Booth, Jr., Rainey C.

Publication type:

Article

DECOUPLING PATENT LAW.

Published in:

Boston University Law Review, 2017, v. 97, n. 2, p. 551

By:

REILLY, GREG

Publication type:

Article

THE END USER'S PREDICAMENT: USER STANDING IN PATENT LITIGATION.

Published in:

Boston University Law Review, 2016, v. 96, n. 6, p. 1929

By:

BERNSTEIN, GAIA

Publication type:

Article

The Right of Trial by Jury in Patent Infringement Cases.

Published in:

Review of Litigation, 2009, v. 28, n. 4, p. 735

By:

Daniel, B. D.

Publication type:

Article

What patent practitioners can learn from Nalpropion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Actavis Laboratories FL, Inc.

Published in:

Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2021, v. 16, n. 9, p. 1000, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpab068

By:

Genieser, Lars H

Publication type:

Article

The US Federal Circuit on the patentability of in vitro diagnostic methods—no light at the end of the tunnel.

Published in:

Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2019, v. 14, n. 10, p. 744, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpz102

By:

Richter, Carsten D

Publication type:

Article

MCM v HP: are patent jury-trials now buggy-whips?

Published in:

Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2017, v. 12, n. 4, p. 331, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpx015

By:

Kunstadt, Robert M.

Publication type:

Article

The passing of the Golden Age of IP: Quo Vadis?

Published in:

Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2017, v. 12, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpw170

By:

Wilkof, Neil

Publication type:

Article

Game changer in the Slants/Redskins trade mark saga: Federal Circuit holds ban on registration of disparaging trade marks unconstitutional.

Published in:

Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2016, v. 11, n. 4, p. 232, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpw006

By:

Schonhofen, Sven

Publication type:

Article

Claim construction is ultimately a question of law but may involve underlying factual questions.

Published in:

Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2015, v. 10, n. 5, p. 319, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpv040

By:

Macedo, Charles R.;
Hudak, Sandra A.;
Jain, Reena

Publication type:

Article

US Supreme Court rewrites standard for claim indefiniteness analysis.

Published in:

Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2014, v. 9, n. 11, p. 874, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpu152

By:

Macedo, Charles R.;
Jain, Reena;
Wang, Victor

Publication type:

Article

US Supreme Court relaxes standards for awarding attorney fees under 35 USC 285 in patent suits.

Published in:

Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2014, v. 9, n. 10, p. 787, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpu129

By:

Macedo, Charles R.;
Jain, Reena

Publication type:

Article

Divided Federal Circuit panel notes the lack of clarity in patent-eligiblity law.

Published in:

Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2014, v. 9, n. 2, p. 96, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpt246

By:

Macedo, Charles R.;
Kasdan, Michael J.;
Jain, Reena

Publication type:

Article

Good-faith belief of invalidity may negate intent for induced patent infringement.

Published in:

Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2013, v. 8, n. 12, p. 901, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpt198

By:

Macedo, Charles R.;
Kasdan, Michael J.;
Hudak, Sandra A.

Publication type:

Article

Licence agreement created sufficient standing to bring claim.

Published in:

Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2013, v. 8, n. 8, p. 596, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpt098

By:

Crowne, Emir;
Zarifian, Mona

Publication type:

Article

Shopping cart patents held invalid, a key judgment for e-commerce.

Published in:

Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2013, v. 8, n. 6, p. 425, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpt064

By:

Barazza, Stefano

Publication type:

Article

US jury properly relied upon second considerations of non-obviousness to overcome prima facie obviousness.

Published in:

Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2013, v. 8, n. 5, p. 343, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpt029

By:

Macedo, Charles R.;
Kasdan, Michael J.;
Zemsky, Richard P.

Publication type:

Article

Bard v Gore: to injunct, or not to injunct, what is the question? Is it right to reward an infringer for successfully exploiting a patent?

Published in:

Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2013, v. 8, n. 5, p. 359, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpt025

By:

Lundie-Smith, Robert;
Moss, Gary

Publication type:

Article

Patent protection for diagnostic methods in the United States: further forays into patent-eligibility.

Published in:

Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2013, v. 8, n. 5, p. 345, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpt038

By:

Ventose, Eddy D.

Publication type:

Article

US Federal Circuit confirms that mere inclusion of a computer limitation is not dispositive of patent-eligibility.

Published in:

Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2013, v. 8, n. 1, p. 8, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jps176

By:

Macedo, Charles R.;
Kasdan, Michael J.;
Hudak, Sandra A.

Publication type:

Article

US Federal Circuit remains split on how to approach patent eligibility.

Published in:

Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2012, v. 7, n. 12, p. 842, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jps152

By:

Macedo, Charles R.;
Kasdan, Michael J.;
Hudak, Sandra A.

Publication type:

Article

Gaylord v. United States.

Published in:

New York Law School Law Review, 2012, v. 56, n. 3, p. 1193

By:

Lawhorn, Jeffrey

Publication type:

Article

Bayer Schering Pharma AG v. Barr Laboratories, Inc.

Published in:

New York Law School Law Review, 2010, v. 55, n. 1, p. 399

By:

ZARABI, JOSHUA

Publication type:

Article

The Tail That Wags the Dog: The Problem of Pre-Merit-Decision Interim Fees and Moral Hazard in the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.

Published in:

Kansas Law Review, 2014, v. 63, p. 1

By:

Todd, Timothy M.

Publication type:

Article

THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT AS A FEDERAL COURT.

Published in:

William & Mary Law Review, 2013, v. 55, n. 1, p. 1791

By:

GUGLIUZZA, PAUL R.

Publication type:

Article

THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT AS A FEDERAL COURT.

Published in:

William & Mary Law Review, 2013, v. 54, n. 6, p. 1791

By:

GUGLIUZZA, PAUL R.

Publication type:

Article

When Is an Investment Loss Deductible? Adkins v. United States Provides Taxpayer-Friendly Guidance.

Published in:

Journal of Taxation of Investments, 2020, v. 38, n. 1, p. 83

By:

Jensen, Erik M.

Publication type:

Article

PLAUSIBLE TO PROPER: CLARIFYING FEDERAL CIRCUIT JURISDICTION OVER WALKER PROCESS APPEALS.

Published in:

American University Business Law Review, 2024, v. 13, n. 1, p. 195

By:

ROZEWICZ, PETER JAMES

Publication type:

Article

STARE INDECISIS: THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT'S EN BANC BATTLE AGAINST ITSELF AND BUSINESS IN LIGHTING BALLAST CONTROL, LLC V. PHILIPS ELECTRONICS NORTH AMERICA CORP.

Published in:

American University Business Law Review, 2015, v. 4, n. 1, p. 63

By:

VALDES, RONNY

Publication type:

Article

On the Wrong Side of the Tracks: An Analysis of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit's Non- Application of the Presumption Against Extraterritoriality [TianRui Grp. Co. v. Int'l Trade Comm'n, 661 F.3d 1322 (Fed. Cir. 2011)].

Published in:

Washburn Law Journal, 2013, v. 52, n. 3, p. 685

By:

Russ, Kerrilyn

Publication type:

Article

PUBLIC TAKINGS OF PUBLIC CONTRACTS.

Published in:

Vermont Law Review, 2012, v. 36, n. 2, p. 517

By:

Echeverria, John

Publication type:

Article

Implied Obviousness: Reevaluating the Jury's Role in Nonobviousness after Kinetic Concepts.

Published in:

Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law, 2014, v. 16, n. 3, p. 669

By:

Silliman, Michael A.

Publication type:

Article

GENDER INEQUALITY IN PATENT LITIGATION.

Published in:

North Carolina Law Review, 2022, v. 100, n. 6, p. 1683

By:

GUGLIUZZA, PAUL R.;
REBOUCHÉ, RACHEL

Publication type:

Article

IT'S "FUCT": THE DEMISE OF THE LANHAM ACT.

Published in:

IDEA: The Intellectual Property Law Review, 2019, v. 59, n. 2, p. 333

By:

COCHRAN, CHRIS

Publication type:

Article

HOW THE JPML CAN BENEFIT FROM THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT AND VICE-VERSA.

Published in:

IDEA: The Intellectual Property Law Review, 2012, v. 52, n. 3, p. 379

By:

NOFAL, CHRISTOPHER PAUL

Publication type:

Article

IRRATIONAL BEHAVIOR, HINDSIGHT, AND PATENTABILITY: BALANCING THE "OBVIOUS TO TRY" TEST WITH UNEXPECTED RESULTS.

Published in:

IDEA: The Intellectual Property Law Review, 2011, v. 51, n. 2, p. 271

By:

Conley, Scott R.

Publication type:

Article

Two New Federal Courts.

Published in:

American Bar Association Journal, 1982, v. 68, n. 9, p. 1091

By:

Schwartz, David

Publication type:

Article

FEDERAL CIRCUIT DECISIONS CONCERNING SMARTPHONES HAVE CREATED UNCERTAINTY REGARDING THE EVIDENCE NEEDED TO PROVE IRREPARABLE HARM AND ESTABLISH ENTITLEMENT TO INJUNCTIVE RELIEF.

Published in:

Rutgers Computer & Technology Law Journal, 2016, v. 42, n. 2, p. 231

By:

AMUNDSON, STEVEN M.

Publication type:

Article

SOME MATH IS HARD, SOME NOT: RULES FOR PATENTABLE SUBJECT MATTER OF SOFTWARE.

Published in:

Rutgers Computer & Technology Law Journal, 2012, v. 38, n. 2, p. 192

By:

Cittone, Henry J.

Publication type:

Article

I CAN DO BAD ALL BY MYSELF: A PROPOSAL FOR STREAMLINING THE CLAIM CONSTRUCTION PROCESS IN PATENT LITIGATION.

Published in:

Rutgers Computer & Technology Law Journal, 2012, v. 38, n. 1, p. 1

By:

DEREGNAUCOURT, STACI R.

Publication type:

Article

ONE CLAIM, ONE STATUTORY CLASS OF INVENTION: HOW THE MACHINE-OR-TRANSFORMATION TEST IMPACTS INDEFINITE ANALYSIS.

Published in:

Rutgers Computer & Technology Law Journal, 2012, v. 38, n. 1, p. 117

By:

LaForgia, Christian

Publication type:

Article

WRONGLY AFFIRMED WITHOUT OPINION.

Published in:

Wake Forest Law Review, 2017, v. 52, n. 4, p. 561

By:

Crouch, Dennis

Publication type:

Article

DANGLING THE CARROT OF TRADEMARK REGISTRATION.

Published in:

Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2023, v. 38, n. 4, p. 1273, doi. 10.15779/Z38J678Z0T

By:

Desnoes, Brigitte

Publication type:

Article

ALICE GETS A HAIRCUT: BERKHEIMER AND AATRIX RESTORE FACTUAL INQUIRY TO PATENT SUBJECT MATTER ELIGIBILITY UNDER § 101.

Published in:

Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2019, v. 34, n. 4, p. 1081

By:

Li Zhang

Publication type:

Article