Works matching DE "UNITED States. Court of Appeals (District of Columbia Circuit)"
1
- Michigan Law Review, 2001, v. 99, n. 7, p. 1651, doi. 10.2307/1290477
- Article
2
- Indiana Law Journal, 2015, v. 91, n. 1, p. 121
- Article
3
- Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law, 2020, v. 25, n. 2, p. 501
- Article
4
- Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law, 2020, v. 25, n. 2, p. 501
- Article
5
- Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy, 2011, v. 7, p. 25
- Article
6
- Boston University Law Review, 2017, v. 97, n. 5, p. 1893
- Article
7
- Frontiers in Ecology & the Environment, 2006, v. 4, n. 4, p. 220, doi. 10.1890/1540-9295(2006)004[0220:APCNSR]2.0.CO;2
- Article
8
- Law & Society Review, 1996, v. 30, n. 4, p. 735, doi. 10.2307/3054116
- Article
9
- Law & Policy, 2004, v. 26, n. 3/4, p. 347, doi. 10.1111/j.1467-9930.2004.00182.x
- Caruson, Kiki;
- Michael Bitzer, J.
- Article
10
- Solar Today, 2014, v. 28, n. 2, p. 10
- Article
11
- Solar Today, 2013, v. 27, n. 2, p. 12
- Article
12
- Solar Today, 2012, v. 26, n. 6, p. 14
- Article
13
- Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 2017, v. 45, n. 1, p. 106, doi. 10.1177/1073110517703104
- Article
14
- Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 2009, v. 37, n. 2, p. 269, doi. 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2009.00371.x
- Article
15
- Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 2006, v. 34, n. 2, p. 472, doi. 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2006.00056.x
- Article
16
- Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 2002, v. 30, n. 1, p. 120
- Article
17
- Judges Forum Review / Revista Forumul Judecătorilor, 2021, n. 1, p. 17
- Article
18
- HerbalGram, 2003, n. 59, p. 52
- Article
19
- HerbalGram, 2003, n. 59, p. 50
- Article
20
- National Security Law Brief, 2011, v. 2, n. 1, p. 89
- Article
21
- Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 1958, v. 14, n. 7, p. 279
- Article
22
- Administrative Law Review, 2006, v. 58, n. 4, p. 995
- Krotoszynski Jr., Ronald J.
- Article
23
- Administrative Law Review, 2006, v. 58, n. 4, p. 981
- Article
24
- Administrative Law Review, 2006, v. 58, n. 4, p. 939
- Article
25
- Administrative Law Review, 2006, v. 58, n. 4, p. 917
- Article
26
- Suffolk Transnational Law Review, 2015, v. 38, n. 2, p. 537
- Article
27
- International Journal of Ethics (1556-4444), 2014, v. 10, n. 1/2, p. 193
- Williams, Erin D.;
- Liu, Edward C.;
- Johnson, Judith A.
- Article
28
- American Bar Association Journal, 1979, v. 65, n. 3, p. 328
- Article
29
- Rutgers Computer & Technology Law Journal, 2015, v. 41, n. 2, p. 166
- Article
30
- Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2008, v. 23, n. 1, p. 685
- Article
31
- Cornell Law Review, 2015, v. 100, n. 4, p. 953
- Article
32
- Creighton Law Review, 2013, v. 46, n. 4, p. 777
- Article
33
- Creighton Law Review, 2011, v. 44, n. 4, p. 1277
- Article
34
- New York University Law Review, 2014, v. 89, n. 5, p. 1589
- Article
35
- New York University Law Review, 2013, v. 88, n. 6, p. 1983
- Article
36
- Nature, 2010, v. 468, n. 7320, p. 10, doi. 10.1038/468010a
- Article
39
- Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin, 2014, v. 80, n. 4, p. 46
- Article
40
- Dispute Resolution Journal, 2025, v. 78, n. 5, p. 451
- Morris, Danielle;
- Young, Alex L.
- Article
41
- Dispute Resolution Journal, 2013, v. 68, n. 3, p. 45
- Article
42
- Dispute Resolution Journal, 1997, v. 52, n. 3, p. 16
- Article
43
- Dispute Resolution Journal, 1997, v. 52, n. 2, p. 4
- Article
45
- Case Western Reserve Law Review, 2014, v. 64, n. 3, p. 711
- Article
46
- Humanity: An International Journal of Human Rights, Humanitarianism & Development, 2017, v. 8, n. 3, p. 539, doi. 10.1353/hum.2017.0036
- Article
47
- Harvard National Security Journal, 2012, v. 3, n. 2, p. 223
- Article
48
- Cato Supreme Court Review, 2014, p. 333
- Article
49
- Vanderbilt Law Review, 2019, v. 72, n. 1, p. 391
- Article
50
- U.C. Davis Law Review, 2012, v. 45, n. 4, p. 1531
- Article