Works matching DE "UNITED States. Court of Appeals (7th Circuit)"
1
- Michigan Law Review, 2020, v. 118, n. 8, p. 1629, doi. 10.36644/mlr.118.8.accommodating
- Article
2
- Michigan Law Review, 2017, v. 115, n. 7, p. 1213
- Bailey, Katherine Stallings
- Article
3
- Indiana Law Journal, 2017, v. 92, p. 28
- Article
4
- Indiana Law Journal, 2016, v. 91, n. 2, p. 569
- Article
5
- Kansas Law Review, 2020, v. 69, n. 2, p. 289
- Article
6
- Kansas Law Review, 2014, v. 62, p. 195
- Article
7
- Kansas Law Review, 2011, p. 189, doi. 10.17161/1808.20204
- Article
8
- University of Illinois Law Review, 2014, v. 2014, n. 4, p. 1401
- Article
9
- Valparaiso University Law Review, 2015, v. 49, n. 3, p. 907
- Article
10
- South Dakota Law Review, 2013, v. 58, n. 2, p. 197
- Article
11
- Southern Illinois University Law Journal, 2012, v. 36, n. 3, p. 613
- Article
12
- Southern Illinois University Law Journal, 2012, v. 36, n. 3, p. 531
- Article
13
- Wisconsin Law Review, 2022, v. 2022, n. 3, p. 739
- Article
14
- Wisconsin Law Review, 2017, v. 2017, n. 2, p. 325
- Article
15
- Wisconsin Law Review, 2017, v. 2017, n. 2, p. 285
- Article
16
- Wisconsin Law Review, 2017, v. 2017, n. 2, p. 225
- Article
18
- Law & Society Review, 2011, v. 45, n. 1, p. 171, doi. 10.1111/j.1540-5893.2011.00431.x
- Article
19
- Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 2008, v. 36, n. 3, p. 438
- Article
20
- American University Business Law Review, 2015, v. 4, n. 1, p. 153
- Article
21
- Suffolk Transnational Law Review, 2014, v. 37, n. 1, p. 235
- Article
22
- Washburn Law Journal, 2014, v. 53, n. 3, p. 617
- Article
23
- Washburn Law Journal, 2013, v. 52, n. 3, p. 613
- Article
24
- Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law, 2012, v. 14, n. 4, p. 889
- Article
26
- North Carolina Law Review, 2016, v. 94, n. 4, p. 1382
- Article
27
- IDEA: The Intellectual Property Law Review, 2014, v. 54, n. 2, p. 157
- Article
28
- Idaho Law Review, 2012, v. 48, n. 1, p. 49
- McCurdy, Christopher C.;
- Thompson, Ryan P.
- Article
29
- American Bar Association Journal, 1978, v. 64, n. 6, p. 903
- Article
30
- American Bar Association Journal, 1975, v. 61, n. 5, p. 613
- Article
31
- Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2007, v. 22, n. 1, p. 381
- Article
32
- Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2005, v. 20, n. 1, p. 727
- Article
33
- Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2005, v. 20, n. 1, p. 673
- Article
34
- Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2005, v. 20, n. 1, p. 485
- Article
35
- Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2005, v. 20, n. 1, p. 334
- Article
36
- Creighton Law Review, 2004, v. 37, n. 4, p. 1029
- Article
37
- Law, Probability & Risk, 2013, v. 12, n. 1, p. 13, doi. 10.1093/lpr/mgs012
- Pan, Qing;
- Gastwirth, Joseph L.
- Article
38
- Chicago-Kent Law Review, 2014, v. 89, n. 3, p. 1131
- Article
39
- Urban Lawyer, 2014, v. 46, n. 3, p. 720
- Article
40
- Urban Lawyer, 2014, v. 46, n. 3, p. 716
- Article
41
- Urban Lawyer, 2014, v. 46, n. 3, p. 710
- Article
42
- Urban Lawyer, 2014, v. 46, n. 3, p. 706
- Article
43
- Urban Lawyer, 2014, v. 46, n. 2, p. 414
- Article
44
- Urban Lawyer, 2012, v. 44, n. 4, p. 911
- Article
45
- Journal of Corporation Law, 2008, v. 33, n. 4, p. 1007
- Article
46
- Dispute Resolution Journal, 2008, v. 63, n. 4, p. 96
- Article
47
- Dispute Resolution Journal, 2007, v. 62, n. 4, p. 6
- Article
48
- Dispute Resolution Journal, 1998, v. 53, n. 1, p. 88
- Article
49
- Dispute Resolution Journal, 1995, v. 50, n. 3, p. 92
- Article
50
- Dispute Resolution Journal, 1995, v. 50, n. 3, p. 89
- Article