Works matching DE "UNITED States. Court of Appeals (10th Circuit)"
1
- Florida Journal of International Law, 2012, v. 24, n. 3, p. 605
- Article
2
- Texas Journal on Civil Liberties & Civil Rights, 2022, v. 28, n. 1, p. 63
- Article
3
- Emory Law Journal, 2024, v. 73, n. 3, p. 703
- Article
4
- Kansas Law Review, 2020, v. 69, n. 2, p. 289
- Article
6
- Kansas Law Review, 2012, p. 1257, doi. 10.17161/1808.20201
- Article
7
- Juvenile & Family Law Digest, 2011, v. 43, n. 9, p. 24
- Article
8
- Law Library Journal, 2001, v. 93, n. 4, p. 589
- Article
9
- Denver Law Review, 2019, v. 96, n. 2, p. 369
- Article
10
- Denver Law Review, 2019, v. 96, n. 2, p. 267
- STEPHENSON, EVAN;
- SCROGGINS-UPTIGROVE, KAYLA
- Article
11
- Denver Law Review, 2018, v. 96, n. 1, p. 177
- Article
12
- Denver Law Review, 2016, v. 93, n. 3, p. 749
- Article
13
- Denver Law Review, 2016, v. 93, n. 3, p. 797
- Article
14
- Denver Law Review, 2016, v. 93, n. 3, p. i
- Article
15
- Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 2006, v. 34, n. 1, p. 134, doi. 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2006.00019.x
- Article
16
- Journal of Education, 1909, v. 70, n. 15, p. 394, doi. 10.1177/002205740907001501
- Article
17
- California Law Review, 2003, v. 91, n. 6, p. 1459, doi. 10.2307/3481397
- Article
18
- Washburn Law Journal, 2014, v. 53, n. 2, p. 403
- Article
19
- Washburn Law Journal, 2012, v. 51, n. 3, p. 767
- Article
20
- Oklahoma City University Law Review, 2016, v. 41, n. 1, p. 83
- Article
21
- Oklahoma City University Law Review, 2015, v. 40, p. 239
- Article
22
- Oklahoma City University Law Review, 2015, v. 40, p. 223
- Article
24
- Oklahoma City University Law Review, 2011, v. 36, n. 3, p. 713
- Article
27
- Florida Bar Journal, 2014, v. 88, n. 2, p. 31
- Article
28
- Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2011, v. 26, n. 1, p. 580
- Article
29
- Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2009, v. 24, n. 1, p. 657
- Article
30
- Creighton Law Review, 2014, v. 47, n. 3, p. 501
- Article
31
- Creighton Law Review, 2010, v. 43, n. 4, p. 1107
- Article
32
- Creighton Law Review, 2010, v. 43, n. 2, p. 563
- Article
33
- University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 2005, v. 153, n. 5, p. 1639, doi. 10.2307/4150637
- Article
34
- New York University Law Review, 2011, v. 86, n. 3, p. 673
- Article
35
- Philosophy of Music Education Review, 2017, v. 25, n. 2, p. 192, doi. 10.2979/philmusieducrevi.25.2.06
- Article
36
- Dispute Resolution Journal, 2010, v. 65, n. 4, p. 99
- Article
37
- Dispute Resolution Journal, 2009, v. 64, n. 2, p. 96
- Article
38
- Dispute Resolution Journal, 2006, v. 61, n. 3, p. 4
- Article
39
- Dispute Resolution Journal, 1995, v. 50, n. 3, p. 90
- Article
40
- Dispute Resolution Journal, 1995, v. 50, n. 3, p. 90
- Article
41
- Benefits Quarterly, 2013, v. 29, n. 3, p. 73
- Article
42
- American Journal of Public Health, 1975, v. 65, n. 2, p. 180, doi. 10.2105/AJPH.65.2.180
- Article
43
- Women & Criminal Justice, 2022, v. 32, n. 1/2, p. 163, doi. 10.1080/08974454.2021.1962481
- Braaten, Claire Nolasco;
- Vaughn, Michael S.
- Article
44
- Tulane Environmental Law Journal, 2008, v. 22, n. 1, p. 197
- Article
45
- Journal of Passthrough Entities, 2012, v. 15, n. 1, p. 7
- Article
46
- Contemporary OB/GYN, 2004, v. 49, n. 2, p. 16
- Article
47
- Land Economics, 1968, v. 44, n. 3, p. 371, doi. 10.2307/3159785
- Article
48
- Journal of Education, 1903, v. 57, n. 18, p. 281
- Article
49
- 1989
- Trauth, Denise M.;
- Huffman, John L.
- Case Study
50
- Employee Responsibilities & Rights Journal, 2009, v. 21, n. 3, p. 171, doi. 10.1007/s10672-009-9109-3
- Article