Works matching DE "UNITED States. Constitutional Convention (1787)"
1
- Slavery & Abolition, 2018, v. 39, n. 1, p. 101, doi. 10.1080/0144039X.2017.1323704
- Article
3
- Juniata Voices, 2006, v. 6, p. 13
- Article
4
- 2009
- Zellers-Frederick, Andrew A.
- Biography
5
- Public Choice, 2022, v. 190, n. 3/4, p. 407, doi. 10.1007/s11127-021-00943-5
- Phillips, Stephen C.;
- Smith, Alex P.;
- Licari, Peter R.
- Article
6
- Public Choice, 2016, v. 167, n. 3/4, p. 245, doi. 10.1007/s11127-016-0339-2
- Article
7
- Albany Law Review, 2021, v. 85, n. 4, p. 88
- Article
8
- Presidential Studies Quarterly, 2015, v. 45, n. 4, p. 778, doi. 10.1111/psq.12229
- Article
9
- Journal of Law & Politics, 2010, v. 26, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
10
- Historical Methods, 2012, v. 45, n. 3, p. 135, doi. 10.1080/01615440.2012.675877
- Dougherty, Keith;
- Heckelman, Jac;
- Carlsen, Paul;
- Gelman, David
- Article
11
- Journal of Supreme Court History, 2013, v. 38, n. 3, p. 281, doi. 10.1353/sch.2013.0001
- Article
12
- American Journal of Legal History, 2016, v. 56, n. 3, p. 326, doi. 10.1093/ajlh/njw007
- Article
13
- Creighton Law Review, 2018, v. 51, n. 3, p. 539
- Article
15
- U.C. Davis Law Review, 2014, v. 47, n. 5, p. 1859
- Article
16
- Proceedings of the American Antiquarian Society (1880 to 2008), 2008, v. 118, n. 2, p. 297
- Article
17
- Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 2016, v. 46, n. 2, p. 147, doi. 10.1093/publius/pjv043
- Article
18
- American Journalism, 2011, v. 28, n. 3, p. 35, doi. 10.1080/08821127.2011.10677787
- Ekstrand, Victoria Smith;
- Jeyaram, Cassandra Imfeld
- Article
19
- Perspectives on Political Science, 2019, v. 48, n. 1, p. 3, doi. 10.1080/10457097.2018.1513751
- Article
20
- North East Journal of Legal Studies, 2014, v. 32, p. 21
- Article
21
- Journal of Southern Legal History, 2016, v. 24, p. 1
- Article
22
- Journal of Southern Legal History, 2016, v. 24, p. 2
- Findley, Jennifer R.;
- Smith Clarke, Jacquelyn
- Article
23
- Virginia Magazine of History & Biography, 2015, v. 123, n. 3, p. 203
- Article
28
- Journal of the Early Republic, 2015, v. 35, n. 3, p. 451, doi. 10.1353/jer.2015.0047
- Article
29
- George Washington Law Review Arguendo, 2012, v. 80, n. 6, p. 1753
- Article
30
- George Washington Law Review Arguendo, 2012, v. 80, n. 6, p. 1707
- Article
31
- George Washington Law Review Arguendo, 2012, v. 80, n. 6, p. 1683
- Article
32
- George Washington Law Review Arguendo, 2012, v. 80, n. 6, p. 1620
- Article
33
- Hofstra Law Review, 2012, v. 41, n. 1, p. 217
- Article
37
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2024, v. 47, n. 1, p. 39
- Article
38
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2017, v. 40, n. 3, p. 573
- Article
39
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2017, v. 40, n. 1, p. 61
- Article
40
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2015, v. 38, n. 2, p. 629
- Article
42
- Legal Communication & Rhetoric: JALWD, 2013, v. 10, p. 89
- Article
43
- Parliaments, Estates & Representation, 2013, v. 33, n. 1, p. 20, doi. 10.1080/02606755.2013.772403
- Article
44
- White House Studies, 2012, v. 12, n. 1, p. 35
- Article
45
- White House Studies, 2009, v. 8, n. 3, p. 357
- Article
46
- William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal, 2024, v. 33, n. 2, p. 375
- Article
47
- William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal, 2015, v. 23, n. 4, p. 1089
- Izquierdo, Richard Alexander
- Article
48
- St. Mary's Law Journal, 2022, v. 53, n. 3, p. 711
- Article
49
- Law & History Review, 2024, v. 42, n. 2, p. 263, doi. 10.1017/S0738248024000038
- Article
50
- Law & History Review, 2010, v. 28, n. 2, p. 453, doi. 10.1017/S0738248010000064
- Article