The Second Amendment on Board: Public and Private Historical Traditions of Firearm Regulation.
- Published in:
- Yale Law Journal, 2024, v. 133, n. 5, p. 1676
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Works matching DE "UNITED States. Constitution. 2nd Amendment"
Results: 457
1
2
Originalism-by-Analogy and Second Amendment Adjudication.
- Published in:
- Yale Law Journal, 2023, v. 133, n. 1, p. 99
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
3
Judicial Bypass and Parental Rights After Dobbs.
- Published in:
- Yale Law Journal, 2023, v. 132, n. 6, p. 1908
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
4
Antisubordinating the Second Amendment.
- Published in:
- Yale Law Journal, 2023, v. 132, n. 6, p. 1821
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
5
Bans.
- Published in:
- Yale Law Journal, 2019, v. 129, n. 2, p. 308
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
6
Open Carry for All: Heller and Our Nineteenth-Century Second Amendment.
- Published in:
- Yale Law Journal, 2014, v. 123, n. 5, p. 1486
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
7
Firearm Localism.
- Published in:
- Yale Law Journal, 2013, v. 123, n. 1, p. 82
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
8
Text, History, and Tradition: What the Seventh Amendment Can Teach Us About the Second.
- Published in:
- Yale Law Journal, 2013, v. 122, n. 4, p. 852
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
9
ESSAY: A CONTINUINGCONSTITUTIONAL TREND OF USING THE FIRST TO INTERPRET THE SECOND.
- Published in:
- Creighton Law Review, 2022, v. 55, n. 3, p. 297
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
10
ESSAY: A CONTINUING CONSTITUTIONAL TREND OF USING THE FIRST TO INTERPRET THE SECOND.
- Published in:
- Creighton Law Review, 2022, v. 55, n. 3, p. 297
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
11
DON'T TAKE YOUR GUNS TO SCHOOL (IN NEBRASKA): ASSESSING THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF THE PRIVATE UNIVERSITIES' EXEMPTION FROM THE CONCEALED HANDGUN PERMIT ACT.
- Published in:
- Creighton Law Review, 2014, v. 48, n. 1, p. 113
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
12
Cities, Preemption, and the Statutory Second Amendment.
- Published in:
- University of Chicago Law Review, 2022, v. 89, n. 2, p. 557
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
13
High-Value, Low-Value, and No-Value Guns: Applying Free Speech Law to the Second Amendment.
- Published in:
- University of Chicago Law Review, 2019, v. 86, n. 7, p. 1981
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
14
What Is Gun Control? Direct Burdens, Incidental Burdens, and the Boundaries of the Second Amendment.
- Published in:
- University of Chicago Law Review, 2016, v. 83, n. 1, p. 295
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
15
NAVIGATING THE SECOND AMENDMENT CROSSFIRE: THE THIRD CIRCUIT TRIGGERS WORKING METHODOLOGY IN UNITED STATES v. MARZZARELLA AND UNITED STATES v. BARTON.
- Published in:
- Villanova Law Review, 2012, v. 57, n. 4, p. 711
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
16
Fitting a Gun in a Circle-a How-To Guide: A Comprehensive Look at the Standard of Review for Gun Regulations Under the Second Amendment.
- Published in:
- University of Miami Law Review, 2017, v. 71, n. 3, p. 895
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
17
ORIGINALISM AND THE PROBLEM OF GENERAL LAW.
- Published in:
- New York University Law Review, 2023, v. 98, n. 6, p. 2017
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
18
IMPLEMENTING THE RIGHT TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS AFTER BRUEN.
- Published in:
- New York University Law Review, 2023, v. 98, n. 6, p. 1950
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
19
GUNS, INC.: CITIZENS UNITED, MCDONALD, AND THE FUTURE OF CORPORATE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS.
- Published in:
- New York University Law Review, 2011, v. 86, n. 4, p. 887
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
20
NYSRPA v. BRUEN AND THE FUTURE OF THE SENSITIVE PLACES DOCTRINE: REJECTING THE AHISTORICAL GOVERNMENT SECURITY APPROACH.
- Published in:
- Boston College Law Review, 2022, v. 63, p. I.-60
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
21
NYSRPA v. BRUEN AND THE FUTURE OF THE SENSITIVE PLACES DOCTRINE: REJECTING THE AHISTORICAL GOVERNMENT SECURITY APPROACH.
- Published in:
- Boston College Law Review, 2022, v. 63, p. I-60
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
22
THE TRAP CHRONICLES, VOL. 3: FELONS & FIREARMS.
- Published in:
- Maryland Law Review, 2025, v. 84, n. 2, p. 309
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
23
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA v. HELLER: FAILING TO ESTABLISH A STANDARD FOR THE FUTURE.
- Published in:
- Maryland Law Review, 2009, v. 68, n. 4, p. 889
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
24
Case Notes.
- Published in:
- Urban Lawyer, 2016, v. 48, n. 2, p. 391
- Publication type:
- Article
25
Palmer v. Dist. of Columbia.
- Published in:
- Urban Lawyer, 2015, v. 47, n. 2, p. 366
- Publication type:
- Article
26
State v. Jorgenson.
- Published in:
- Urban Lawyer, 2014, v. 46, n. 3, p. 709
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
27
Peruta v. Cnty. of San Diego.
- Published in:
- Urban Lawyer, 2014, v. 46, n. 3, p. 708
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
28
Nat'l Rifle Ass'n, Inc. v. McCraw.
- Published in:
- Urban Lawyer, 2013, v. 45, n. 4, p. 1015
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
29
Commonwealth v. McGowan.
- Published in:
- Urban Lawyer, 2013, v. 45, n. 2, p. 504
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
30
United States v. Decastro.
- Published in:
- Urban Lawyer, 2012, v. 44, n. 4, p. 909
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
31
Armed Citizens: The Road from Ancient Rome to the Second Amendment by Noah Shusterman (review).
- Published in:
- 2021
- By:
- Publication type:
- Book Review
32
A Right to Bear Arms? The Contested Role of History in Contemporary Debates on the Second Amendment ed. by Jennifer Tucker, Barton C. Hacker and Margaret Vining (review).
- Published in:
- 2021
- By:
- Publication type:
- Book Review
33
Originalism in a Digital Age: An Inquiry into the Right to Bear Arms.
- Published in:
- Journal of the Early Republic, 2009, v. 29, n. 4, p. 585, doi. 10.1353/jer.0.0107
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
34
BRUEN, GUN RIGHTS, AND THE SHACKLES OF HISTORY.
- Published in:
- Duke Law Journal, 2023, v. 73, n. 2, p. 67
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
35
THE DEAD HAND OF A SILENT PAST: BRUEN, GUN RIGHTS, AND THE SHACKLES OF HISTORY.
- Published in:
- Duke Law Journal, 2023, v. 73, n. 1, p. 67
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
36
LEAVE YOUR GUNS AT HOME: THE= CONSTITUTIONALITY OF A PROHIBITION ON CARRYING FIREARMS AT POLITICAL DEMONSTRATIONS.
- Published in:
- Duke Law Journal, 2018, v. 68, n. 1, p. 175
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
37
FROM THEORY TO DOCTRINE: AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF THE RIGHT TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS AFTER HELLER.
- Published in:
- Duke Law Journal, 2018, v. 67, n. 7, p. 1433
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
38
INSTITUTIONS AND THE SECOND AMENDMENT.
- Published in:
- Duke Law Journal, 2016, v. 66, n. 1, p. 69
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
39
UNFINISHED LIBERTIES, INEVITABLE BALANCING.
- Published in:
- Columbia Law Review, 2025, v. 125, n. 3, p. 531
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
40
SECOND-CLASS: HELLER, AGE, AND THE PRODIGAL AMENDMENT.
- Published in:
- Columbia Law Review, 2017, v. 117, n. 6, p. 1585
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
41
An Ethical Analysis of the Second Amendment: The Right to Pack Heat at Work.
- Published in:
- Business & Society Review (00453609), 2014, v. 119, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.1111/basr.12023
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
42
SUBSTANTIAL BURDENS IN THE LAW.
- Published in:
- Southwestern Law Review, 2016, v. 46, n. 1, p. 1
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
43
Allan J. Lichtman. Repeal the Second Amendment: The Case for a Safer America; Jennifer Tucker, Barton C. Hacker, and Margaret Vining, editors. A Right to Bear Arms? The Contested Role of History in Contemporary Debates on the Second Amendment.
- Published in:
- 2021
- By:
- Publication type:
- Book Review
44
Libtard gungrabbers and #PewPewLife: Multiple realities in a political issue-centric forum.
- Published in:
- Poster, 2017, v. 5, n. 1, p. 53, doi. 10.1386/post.5.1.53_1
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
45
The American Terrorist.
- Published in:
- 2016
- By:
- Publication type:
- Editorial
46
The History and Tradition of Regulating Guns in Parks.
- Published in:
- Harvard Law & Policy Review, 2024, v. 19, n. 1, p. 201
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
47
YOU'LL GROW INTO IT: HOW FEDERAL AND STATE COURTS HAVE ERRED IN EXCLUDING PERSONS UNDER TWENTY-ONE FROM 'THE PEOPLE' PROTECTED BY THE SECOND AMENDMENT.
- Published in:
- FIU Law Review, 2023, v. 17, n. 1, p. 197, doi. 10.25148/lawrev.17.1.9
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
48
PUT YOUR HANDS UP, AND STEP AWAY FROM THE SCRUTINY: LOWERING THE STANDARD OF REVIEW FOR LARGE-CAPACITY MAGAZINE LEGISLATION.
- Published in:
- FIU Law Review, 2022, v. 16, n. 2, p. 431, doi. 10.25148/lawrev.16.2.10
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
49
YOU CAN BUILD A WALL OR DEPORT THEM, BUT YOU CAN’T TAKE AWAY THEIR GUNS: AN ANALYSIS OF WHY NON-U.S. CITIZENS ARE “THE PEOPLE” UNDER THE SECOND AMENDMENT.
- Published in:
- FIU Law Review, 2016, v. 12, n. 1, p. 151
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
50
In Denial about the Obvious: Upending the Rhetoric of the Modern Second Amendment.
- Published in:
- Cato Supreme Court Review, 2023, p. 201
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article