THE THIN DIVIDE: BUSINESS MODEL, PATENTABLE PROCESS OR UNPATENTABLE PRINCIPLE?
- Published in:
- Journal of Technology Law & Policy, 2010, v. 15, n. 1, p. 113
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Works matching DE "UNITED States. Board of Patent Appeals %26 Interferences"
Results: 5
1
2
KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS ELECTRONICS N. V. V. CARDIAC SCIENCE OPERATING Co.
- Published in:
- Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2011, v. 26, n. 1, p. 369
- Publication type:
- Article
3
IN RE BEINEKE 690 F.3D 1344 (FED. CIR. 2012).
- Published in:
- DePaul Journal of Art, Technology & Intellectual Property Law, 2013, v. 23, n. 2, p. 511
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
4
A CRITIQUE OF IN RE BILSKI.
- Published in:
- DePaul Journal of Art, Technology & Intellectual Property Law, 2009, v. 20, n. 1, p. 11
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
5
Two Methodologies for Predicting Patent Litigation Outcomes: Logistic Regression Versus Classification Trees.
- Published in:
- American Business Law Journal, 2014, v. 51, n. 4, p. 843, doi. 10.1111/ablj.12036
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article