Works matching DE "UNITED States v. Robinson (Supreme Court case)"
Results: 6
WHAT IS THE SCOPE OF SEARCHES OF CELL PHONES INCIDENT TO ARREST? UNITED STATES V. WURIE AND THE RETURN OF CHIMEL.
- Published in:
- Maine Law Review, 2014, v. 66, n. 2, p. 591
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Armed and Not Dangerous? A Mistaken Treatment of Firearms in Terry Analyses.
- Published in:
- Texas Law Review, 2017, v. 95, n. 5, p. 1165
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
A SPECIAL ASPECT OF RELEVANCE: COUNTERING NEGATIVE INTERFERENCES ASSOCIATED WITH THE ABSENCE OF EVIDENCE.
- Published in:
- California Law Review, 1978, v. 66, n. 5, p. 1011, doi. 10.2307/3479904
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE--SEARCH INCIDENT TO ARREST--WARRANTLESS COLLECTION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION FROM CELL PHONES DEEMED UNCONSTITUTIONAL. Riley v. California, 134 S. Ct. 2473 (2014).
- Published in:
- Cumberland Law Review, 2014, v. 45, n. 1, p. 211
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
You Should Be Free To Talk the Talk and Walk the Walk: Applying Riley v. California to Smart Activity Trackers.
- Published in:
- Minnesota Law Review, 2016, v. 100, n. 4, p. 1689
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
FOREWORD: ACCOUNTING FOR TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE.
- Published in:
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2013, v. 36, n. 2, p. 404
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article