That '70s Show: Why the 11<sup>th</sup> Circuit was Wrong to Rely on Cases from the 1970s to Decide a Cell-Phone Tracking Case.Published in:University of Miami Law Review, 2016, v. 70, n. 4, p. 1179By:MARKUS, DAVID OSCAR;WESSLER, NATHAN FREEDPublication type:Article
CRIMINAL LAW--SEARCH AND SEIZURES: DETERMINING WHEN AN INDIVIDUAL MAY HAVE A REASONABLE EXPECTATION OF PRIVACY IN A SHARED RESIDENCE.Published in:North Dakota Law Review, 2015, v. 91, n. 2, p. 411By:Lawrence, MindyPublication type:Article
CELLPHONES AND THE FOURTH AMENDMENT: WHY CELLPHONE USERS HAVE A REASONABLE EXPECTATION OF PRIVACY IN THEIR LOCATION INFORMATION.Published in:Journal of Law & Policy, 2016, v. 25, n. 1, p. 317By:Cividanes, PaulPublication type:Article
DAVIS V. UNITED STATES: WHY THE SUPREME COURT SHOULD PRESERVE JUDICIAL INTEGRITY AND PREVENT FURTHER EROSION OF THE EXCLUSIONARY RULE.Published in:Faulkner Law Review, 2011, v. 2, n. 2, p. 361By:Campbell, Christopher A.Publication type:Article