Works matching DE "UNITED States v. Davis (Supreme Court case)"
Results: 4
CELLPHONES AND THE FOURTH AMENDMENT: WHY CELLPHONE USERS HAVE A REASONABLE EXPECTATION OF PRIVACY IN THEIR LOCATION INFORMATION.
- Published in:
- Journal of Law & Policy, 2016, v. 25, n. 1, p. 317
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
CRIMINAL LAW--SEARCH AND SEIZURES: DETERMINING WHEN AN INDIVIDUAL MAY HAVE A REASONABLE EXPECTATION OF PRIVACY IN A SHARED RESIDENCE.
- Published in:
- North Dakota Law Review, 2015, v. 91, n. 2, p. 411
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
That '70s Show: Why the 11<sup>th</sup> Circuit was Wrong to Rely on Cases from the 1970s to Decide a Cell-Phone Tracking Case.
- Published in:
- University of Miami Law Review, 2016, v. 70, n. 4, p. 1179
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
DAVIS V. UNITED STATES: WHY THE SUPREME COURT SHOULD PRESERVE JUDICIAL INTEGRITY AND PREVENT FURTHER EROSION OF THE EXCLUSIONARY RULE.
- Published in:
- Faulkner Law Review, 2011, v. 2, n. 2, p. 361
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article