Works matching DE "UNITED States Congress powers %26 duties"
1
- Yale Law Journal, 2018, v. 128, n. 1, p. 166
- Article
3
- Yale Law Journal, 2014, v. 124, n. 3, p. 576
- Article
5
- Yale Law Journal, 2014, v. 123, n. 6, p. 1626
- Article
6
- Creighton Law Review, 2013, v. 46, n. 4, p. 721
- Article
7
- University of Miami Law Review, 2011, v. 66, n. 1, p. 259
- Article
8
- Natural Resources Journal, 2013, v. 53, n. 2, p. 325
- Article
9
- California Law Review, 1975, v. 63, n. 4, p. 983, doi. 10.2307/3479839
- Article
10
- Columbia Law Review, 2013, v. 113, n. 4, p. 1051
- Article
11
- Emory Law Journal, 2017, v. 66, n. 6, p. 1391
- Article
12
- Emory Law Journal, 2016, v. 65, n. 5, p. 1255
- Article
13
- Emory Law Journal, 2014, v. 64, n. 1, p. 71
- Article
14
- Temple Law Review, 2013, v. 86, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
15
- Southern California Law Review, 2016, v. 90, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
16
- Southern California Law Review, 2016, v. 89, n. 5, p. 1243
- Article
17
- Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 2011, v. 41, n. 3, p. 447, doi. 10.1093/publius/pjr010
- Article
18
- Michigan Law Review, 2016, v. 115, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
19
- Michigan Law Review, 2016, v. 115, n. 1, p. 46
- Baasch, Ryan;
- Prakash, Saikrishna Bangalore
- Article
20
- Michigan Law Review, 2015, v. 114, n. 2, p. 235
- Hines Jr., James R.;
- Logue, Kyle D.
- Article
21
- Michigan Law Review, 2015, v. 113, n. 8, p. 1337
- Prakash, Saikrishna Bangalore
- Article
22
- Michigan Law Review, 2015, v. 113, n. 7, p. 1115
- Article
23
- Michigan Law Review, 2013, v. 112, n. 3, p. 331
- Article
24
- Michigan Law Review, 2013, v. 112, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
25
- Michigan Law Review, 2013, v. 111, n. 5, p. 647
- O'Connor, Erin O'Hara;
- Ribstein, Larry E.
- Article
26
- Law & Contemporary Problems, 2015, v. 78, n. 3, p. 129
- Article
27
- George Washington Law Review, 2017, v. 85, n. 1, p. 226
- Article
28
- George Washington Law Review, 2017, v. 85, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
29
- George Washington Law Review, 2016, v. 84, n. 3, p. 668
- Article
30
- George Washington Law Review, 2014, v. 82, n. 4, p. 1052
- Article
31
- California Law Review, 2017, v. 105, n. 5, p. 1375, doi. 10.15779/Z38H12V721
- Farber, Daniel A.;
- O'Connell, Anne Joseph
- Article
32
- California Law Review, 2017, v. 105, n. 4, p. 985, doi. 10.15779/Z38QZ22G70
- Article
33
- California Law Review, 2017, v. 105, n. 2, p. 539, doi. 10.15779/Z38HX15Q49
- Article
34
- California Law Review, 2015, v. 103, n. 2, p. 387
- Article
35
- California Law Review, 2015, v. 103, n. 1, p. 103
- Article
36
- California Law Review, 2014, v. 102, n. 5, p. 1123
- Elmendorf, Christopher S.;
- Spencer, Douglas M.
- Article
37
- California Law Review, 2013, v. 101, n. 6, p. 1565
- Article
38
- Indiana International & Comparative Law Review, 2019, v. 29, n. 2, p. 369, doi. 10.18060/23326
- Article
39
- Valparaiso University Law Review, 2015, v. 50, n. 1, p. 321
- Article
40
- Valparaiso University Law Review, 2015, v. 49, n. 3, p. 723
- Article
41
- Public Administration Review, 2007, v. 67, n. 6, p. 1041, doi. 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00795.x
- Article
42
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2019, v. 42, n. 2, p. 681
- Article
43
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2019, v. 42, n. 1, p. 29
- Article
44
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2018, v. 41, n. 1, p. 187
- Article
45
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2017, v. 40, n. 2, p. 417
- Article
46
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2015, v. 38, n. 2, p. 453
- Article
47
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2015, v. 38, n. 1, p. 337
- Article
48
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2015, v. 38, n. 1, p. 267
- Article