Works matching DE "UNIPOLARITY (International relations)"
1
- Washington Quarterly, 2014, v. 37, n. 4, p. 7, doi. 10.1080/0163660X.2014.1002150
- Article
2
- Washington Quarterly, 2014, v. 37, n. 1, p. 115, doi. 10.1080/0163660X.2014.893178
- Article
3
- Washington Quarterly, 2011, v. 34, n. 2, p. 7, doi. 10.1080/0163660X.2011.562080
- Article
4
- Washington Quarterly, 1997, v. 20, n. 2, p. 41, doi. 10.1080/01636609709550241
- Article
5
- Security Studies, 2017, v. 26, n. 3, p. 423, doi. 10.1080/09636412.2017.1306394
- Article
6
- Transylvanian Review, 2013, v. 22, p. 71
- Article
7
- New Zealand International Review, 2024, v. 49, n. 6, p. 2
- Article
8
- International Relations / Uluslararasi Iliskiler, 2019, v. 16, n. 62, p. 27, doi. 10.33458/uidergisi.588897
- Article
9
- Akdeniz University Faculty of Economics & Administrative Sciences Faculty Journal / Akdeniz Universitesi Iktisadi ve Idari Bilimler Fakultesi Dergisi, 2012, v. 12, n. 23, p. 78
- Article
10
- American Diplomacy, 2013, p. 1
- Article
11
- Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 2012, v. 25, n. 1, p. 123, doi. 10.1080/09557571.2011.558494
- Article
12
- Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 2011, v. 24, n. 2, p. 165, doi. 10.1080/09557571.2011.558489
- Article
13
- Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 2011, v. 24, n. 2, p. 175, doi. 10.1080/09557571.2010.496848
- Article
14
- Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 2011, v. 24, n. 2, p. 119, doi. 10.1080/09557571.2011.582994
- Article
15
- Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 2011, v. 24, n. 2, p. 121, doi. 10.1080/09557571.2011.558492
- Article
16
- Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 2011, v. 24, n. 2, p. 149, doi. 10.1080/09557571.2011.558491
- Article
17
- Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 2011, v. 24, n. 2, p. 129, doi. 10.1080/09557571.2011.582996
- Article
18
- Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 2011, v. 24, n. 2, p. 201, doi. 10.1080/09557571.2011.583008
- Brooks, StephenG;
- Wohlforth, WilliamC
- Article
19
- Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 2011, v. 24, n. 2, p. 135, doi. 10.1080/09557571.2011.570740
- Article
20
- Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 2011, v. 24, n. 2, p. 185, doi. 10.1080/09557571.2011.558490
- Article
21
- Journal of Contemporary African Studies, 2018, v. 36, n. 2, p. 207, doi. 10.1080/02589001.2017.1364355
- Article
22
- South African Journal of International Affairs, 2015, v. 22, n. 2, p. 185, doi. 10.1080/10220461.2015.1052010
- Article
23
- South African Journal of International Affairs, 2013, v. 20, n. 2, p. 227, doi. 10.1080/10220461.2013.811338
- Bezuidenhout, Henri;
- Claassen, Carike
- Article
24
- Insight Turkey, 2014, v. 16, n. 1, p. 64
- Article
25
- International Policy Digest, 2016, v. 3, n. 4, p. 92
- Article
26
- Politics, 2013, v. 33, n. 1, p. 37, doi. 10.1111/j.1467-9256.2012.01449.x
- Article
27
- Language in India, 2017, v. 17, n. 8, p. 137
- Article
28
- Canadian Foreign Policy Journal (CFPJ), 2012, v. 18, n. 1, p. 9, doi. 10.1080/11926422.2012.674383
- Article
29
- Canadian Foreign Policy Journal (CFPJ), 2012, v. 18, n. 1, p. 26, doi. 10.1080/11926422.2012.674380
- Article
30
- Canadian Foreign Policy Journal (CFPJ), 2012, v. 18, n. 1, p. 2, doi. 10.1080/11926422.2012.684868
- Hawes, Michael;
- Kirkey, Christopher
- Article
31
- Security Challenges, 2016, v. 12, n. 1, p. 19
- Article
32
- Security Studies, 2014, v. 23, n. 4, p. 715, doi. 10.1080/09636412.2014.964991
- Article
33
- Security Studies, 2012, v. 21, n. 2, p. 154, doi. 10.1080/09636412.2012.679201
- Article
34
- Connections (18121098), 2016, v. 15, n. 1, p. 32, doi. 10.11610/Connections.15.1.02
- Article
35
- Journal of Intervention & Statebuilding, 2012, v. 6, n. 4, p. 387, doi. 10.1080/17502977.2012.714237
- Murray, Robert W.;
- Hehir, Aidan
- Article
36
- IDEAZ, 2012, v. 10-12, p. 11
- Article
38
- Strategic Impact, 2013, v. 48, n. 3, p. 15
- Article
39
- Strategic Impact, 2013, v. 48, n. 3, p. 6
- Article
40
- Electronic Turkish Studies, 2016, v. 11, n. 2, p. 685, doi. 10.7827/TurkishStudies.9094
- Article
41
- Globalizations, 2016, v. 13, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.1080/14747731.2015.1102944
- Article
42
- Strategic Studies Quarterly, 2015, v. 9, n. 2, p. 69
- Article
43
- International Relations, 2018, v. 32, n. 1, p. 3, doi. 10.1177/0047117817753272
- Article
44
- International Relations, 2018, v. 32, n. 1, p. 60, doi. 10.1177/0047117817726363
- Article
45
- International Relations, 2016, v. 30, n. 1, p. 78, doi. 10.1177/0047117815593137
- Article
46
- Relações Internacionais, 2013, n. 38, p. 009
- Article
48
- Bilge Strateji, 2013, v. 5, n. 8, p. 69
- Article
49
- Synesis: A Journal of Science, Technology, Ethics & Policy, 2012, v. 3, n. 1, p. G:40
- Article
50
- Latin American Policy, 2010, v. 1, n. 2, p. 230, doi. 10.1111/j.2041-7373.2010.00017.x
- Sánchez Ramírez, Pablo Telman
- Article