Works matching DE "UNIFORM state laws"
1
- Tax Executive, 2008, v. 60, n. 3, p. 217
- Article
2
- California Law Review, 1996, v. 84, n. 3, p. 703, doi. 10.2307/3480964
- Article
3
- Emory Law Journal, 2015, v. 64, n. 4, p. 1103
- Article
4
- Bifocal, 2013, v. 34, n. 6, p. 123
- Article
5
- Washburn Law Journal, 2022, v. 61, n. 2, p. 275
- Hockstad, Trayce;
- Fisher, Justin
- Article
7
- Monash University Law Review, 2010, v. 36, n. 3, p. 250
- Article
8
- Capital University Law Review, 2017, v. 45, n. 2, p. 333
- Article
9
- American Bar Association Journal, 1977, v. 63, n. 9, p. 1193
- Article
10
- American Bar Association Journal, 1977, v. 63, n. 9, p. 1179
- Article
11
- American Bar Association Journal, 1976, v. 62, n. 10, p. 1328
- Article
12
- American Bar Association Journal, 1976, v. 62, n. 6, p. 508
- Article
13
- American Bar Association Journal, 1975, v. 61, n. 11, p. 1399
- Article
14
- American Bar Association Journal, 1975, v. 61, n. 7, p. 848
- Pirsig, Maynard E.;
- Kirwin, Kenneth F.
- Article
15
- Houston Journal of International Law, 2016, v. 38, n. 1, p. 281
- Article
16
- Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 2017, p. 45
- Article
17
- Spectrum: Journal of State Government, 2004, v. 77, n. 4, p. 8
- Article
19
- Law & Contemporary Problems, 1965, v. 30, n. 2, p. 233, doi. 10.2307/1190513
- Article
20
- Law & Contemporary Problems, 1958, v. 23, n. 1, p. 14, doi. 10.2307/1190263
- Article
21
- Law & Contemporary Problems, 1951, v. 16, n. 2, p. 284, doi. 10.2307/1190096
- Article
22
- Law & Contemporary Problems, 1951, v. 16, n. 1, p. 141, doi. 10.2307/1190014
- Article
23
- University of Louisville Law Review, 2023, v. 61, n. 2, p. 317
- Article
24
- Florida Bar Journal, 2018, v. 92, n. 2, p. 51
- Henry, Thornton B.;
- Pressly III, J. Grier
- Article
25
- Florida Bar Journal, 2017, v. 91, n. 8, p. 32
- Article
26
- Valparaiso University Law Review, 2015, v. 49, n. 3, p. 997
- Article
27
- Fordham Urban Law Journal, 2011, v. 38, n. 3, p. 751
- Article
28
- Journal of Applied Statistics, 2012, v. 39, n. 9, p. 1881, doi. 10.1080/02664763.2012.684874
- Article
29
- Dispute Resolution Journal, 2016, v. 71, n. 1, p. 61
- Article
30
- Dispute Resolution Journal, 2016, v. 71, n. 1, p. 47
- Article
31
- Dispute Resolution Journal, 2016, v. 71, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
32
- Dispute Resolution Journal, 2006, v. 61, n. 2, p. 7
- Article
33
- Dispute Resolution Journal, 2000, v. 55, n. 4, p. 7
- Article
34
- International Journal of Bifurcation & Chaos in Applied Sciences & Engineering, 2009, v. 19, n. 8, p. 2727, doi. 10.1142/S021812740902444X
- ESCAFF, DANIEL;
- DESCALZI, ORAZIO
- Article
35
- Utah Bar Journal, 2017, v. 30, n. 6, p. 48
- Article
36
- Utah Bar Journal, 2013, v. 26, n. 6, p. 42
- Wilkins, Justice Michael J.
- Article
37
- Iowa Law Review, 2021, v. 106, n. 4, p. 1923
- Article
38
- Minnesota Law Review, 2022, v. 107, n. 2, p. 869
- Article
39
- Minnesota Law Review, 2015, v. 99, n. 6, p. 2253
- Article
40
- Washington & Lee Law Review, 2017, v. 74, n. 1, p. 77
- Article
41
- Journal of Marketing, 1964, v. 28, n. 1, p. 82
- Article
42
- Journal of Law & Health, 2011, v. 24, n. 2, p. 323
- Article
44
- California Law Review, 1922, v. 10, n. 4, p. 329
- Article
45
- Journal of Health & Life Sciences Law, 2012, v. 5, n. 3, p. 125
- Article
46
- Alabama Lawyer, 2018, v. 79, n. 1, p. 60
- Lathram, Othni J.;
- Ward, Senator Cam
- Article
47
- Alabama Lawyer, 2013, v. 74, n. 6, p. 398
- Article
48
- Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal, 2023, v. 33, n. 2, p. 277
- Article
49
- Georgia Law Review, 2016, v. 50, n. 2, p. 593
- Article
50
- Tulane Law Review, 2023, v. 97, n. 5, p. 743
- Article