Works matching DE "UNCONSCIONABLE contracts"
1
- Journal of the Professional Lawyer, 2016, p. 129
- Article
2
- European Review of Contract Law, 2010, v. 6, n. 1, p. 25, doi. 10.1515/ERCL.2010.25
- Article
3
- Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai, Iurisprudentia, 2013, n. 4, p. 260
- Article
4
- Boston University Law Review, 2014, v. 94, n. 4, p. 1419
- Article
5
- University of New South Wales Law Journal, 2022, v. 45, n. 1, p. 285
- Article
6
- Kansas Law Review, 2014, v. 62, n. 2, p. 403
- Sura, Arpan A.;
- DeRise, Robert A.
- Article
7
- University of Illinois Law Review, 2018, v. 2018, n. 1, p. 185
- Article
8
- Valparaiso University Law Review, 2013, v. 47, n. 4, p. 965
- Marcum, Tanya M.;
- Campbell, Elizabeth A.
- Article
9
- William & Mary Law Review, 2010, v. 52, n. 1, p. 133
- Article
10
- Wisconsin Law Review, 2020, v. 2020, n. 4, p. 769
- Article
11
- University of the Pacific Law Review, 2019, v. 50, n. 3, p. 373
- Article
12
- California Law Review, 2019, v. 107, n. 6, p. 2015, doi. 10.15779/Z382B8VC3W
- Article
15
- University of Toledo Law Review, 2022, v. 54, n. 1, p. 91
- Article
16
- Oklahoma City University Law Review, 2022, v. 47, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
17
- Florida Bar Journal, 2014, v. 88, n. 2, p. 40
- Article
18
- Legal Studies, 2021, v. 41, n. 4, p. 547, doi. 10.1017/lst.2021.14
- Article
19
- Wake Forest Law Review, 2014, v. 49, n. 2, p. 633
- Becker, Brett M.;
- Sechrist II, John R.
- Article
20
- Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2019, v. 34, n. 2, p. 567, doi. 10.15779/Z38PGlHP01
- Article
21
- Rassegna di diritto ed Economia dello Sport, 2017, v. 12, n. 2, p. 821
- SADEGHLOO, AHMAD YOUSEFI;
- MOGHADAM, ZEYNAB NAVABI
- Article
22
- George Washington Law Review, 2017, v. 85, n. 2, p. 613
- Article
23
- Chicago-Kent Law Review, 2014, v. 89, n. 1, p. 229
- Article
24
- Dispute Resolution Journal, 2013, v. 68, n. 3, p. 1
- Marrow, Paul Bennett;
- Penn, Craig E.
- Article
25
- Dispute Resolution Journal, 2011, v. 66, n. 4, p. 86
- Article
26
- Dispute Resolution Journal, 2011, v. 66, n. 3, p. 96
- Article
27
- Journal of Political Philosophy, 2014, v. 22, n. 1, p. 27, doi. 10.1111/jopp.12009
- Article
28
- Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal, 2021, v. 21, n. 2, p. 336, doi. 10.1080/14729342.2021.1991648
- Article
29
- Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal, 2011, v. 11, n. 2, p. 217, doi. 10.5235/147293411799804506
- Article
30
- UMKC Law Review, 2013, v. 82, n. 1, p. 205
- Article
31
- U.C. Davis Law Review, 2016, v. 50, n. 1, p. 535
- Article
32
- Vniversitas, 2023, v. 72, p. 1, doi. 10.11144/Javeriana.vj72.cace
- Rodríguez Yong, Camilo Andrés;
- Yong Serrano, Samuel
- Article
33
- Vniversitas, 2011, n. 122, p. 519
- Rodríguez-Yong, Camilo A.
- Article
34
- Texas Wesleyan Law Review, 2008, v. 15, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.37419/twlr.v15.i1.1
- Article
35
- Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, 2016, v. 35, n. 1, p. 249
- Article
36
- Canadian Class Action Review / Revue Canadienne du Recours Collectif, 2017, v. 13, n. 2, p. 227
- Article
37
- Marquette Law Review, 2014, v. 97, n. 3, p. 751
- Article
38
- Singapore Journal of Legal Studies, 2023, p. 1
- GÉLINAS, FABIEN;
- GOLDFORD, ZACKARY
- Article
39
- Singapore Journal of Legal Studies, 2021, p. 100
- Article
40
- Singapore Journal of Legal Studies, 2020, p. 295
- Article
41
- Singapore Journal of Legal Studies, 2019, p. 29
- Article
42
- Singapore Journal of Legal Studies, 2013, p. 361
- Article
43
- Canadian Journal of Family Law / Revue Canadienne de Droit Familial, 2009, v. 25, n. 2, p. 257
- Article
44
- Southern Law Journal, 2023, v. 32, n. 1, p. 145
- Article
45
- North East Journal of Legal Studies, 2011, v. 26, p. 85
- Article
46
- Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities, 2015, v. 27, n. 2, p. 213
- Article
47
- Loyola of Los Angeles Entertainment Law Review, 2015, v. 35, n. 1, p. 95
- Article
48
- Cardozo Law Review, 2021, v. 42, n. 6, p. 2183
- Article
49
- Texas Law Review, 2020, v. 99, n. 2, p. 283
- Article
50
- Gonzaga Law Review, 2012, v. 48, n. 1, p. 187
- Article