Works matching DE "TRIALS (Malpractice)"
1
- Medical Decision Making, 2008, v. 28, n. 2, p. 201, doi. 10.1177/0272989X07313280
- Article
2
- Touro Law Review, 2015, v. 31, n. 3, p. 521
- Article
4
- Journal of Law, Economics & Organization, 2014, v. 30, n. 2, p. 244, doi. 10.1093/jleo/ewt002
- Article
5
- Arbitration Journal, 1979, v. 34, n. 2, p. 61
- Article
6
- American Journal of Law & Medicine, 1979, v. 4, n. 4, p. 429
- Article
7
- American Journal of Law & Medicine, 1979, v. 4, n. 4, p. 429
- Article
8
- American Journal of Law & Medicine, 1979, v. 4, n. 4, p. 428
- Article
9
- American Journal of Law & Medicine, 1979, v. 4, n. 4, p. 424
- Article
10
- American Journal of Law & Medicine, 1979, v. 4, n. 4, p. 423
- Article
11
- JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, 2014, v. 311, n. 6, p. 573, doi. 10.1001/jama.2013.286177
- Article
12
- Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 2005, v. 33, n. 3, p. 622
- Article
13
- British Journal of Nursing, 2005, v. 14, n. 11, p. 610, doi. 10.12968/bjon.2005.14.11.18205
- Article
14
- Chicago-Kent Law Review, 2013, v. 88, n. 1, p. 245
- Article
15
- Medical Law Review, 2023, v. 31, n. 2, p. 226, doi. 10.1093/medlaw/fwac037
- Article
16
- Contemporary OB/GYN, 2007, v. 52, n. 7, p. 30
- Article
17
- Contemporary OB/GYN, 2007, v. 52, n. 7, p. 29
- Article
18
- Contemporary OB/GYN, 2006, v. 51, n. 11, p. 98
- Article
19
- Contemporary OB/GYN, 2006, v. 51, n. 10, p. 25
- Article
20
- Contemporary OB/GYN, 2003, v. 48, n. 8, p. 32
- Article
21
- 2003
- Aaronson, Mark J.;
- Kaplan, Andrew I.
- Case Study
22
- Contemporary OB/GYN, 2001, v. 46, n. 10, p. 124
- Article
23
- Contemporary OB/GYN, 2001, v. 46, n. 7, p. 122
- Article
24
- Argumentation & Advocacy, 2002, v. 39, n. 1, p. 23, doi. 10.1080/00028533.2002.11821575
- Worthington, Debra L.;
- Levasseur, David G.
- Article
25
- Nursing Standard, 2007, v. 21, n. 45, p. 10
- Article
26
- ANZ Journal of Surgery, 2007, v. 77, n. 10, p. 824, doi. 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2007.04252.x
- Article
27
- American Bar Association Journal, 1975, v. 61, n. 7, p. 872
- Article
28
- Family Practice Management, 2004, v. 11, n. 3, p. 62
- MacNeill, Martin J.;
- MacNeill, Alexis
- Article
29
- Africa Research Bulletin: Political, Social & Cultural Series, 2006, v. 43, n. 7, p. 16733
- Article
30
- Annals of Internal Medicine, 1995, v. 122, n. 6, p. 450, doi. 10.7326/0003-4819-122-6-199503150-00008
- Hyams, Andrew L.;
- Brandenburg, Jennifer A.
- Article
31
- Clinical Risk, 2007, v. 13, n. 1, p. 33, doi. 10.1258/135626207779598355
- Article
32
- Clinical Risk, 2005, v. 11, n. 2, p. 82, doi. 10.1258/1356262053429688
- Article
33
- Clinical Risk, 2005, v. 11, n. 2, p. 84, doi. 10.1258/1356262053429714
- Article
34
- Clinical Risk, 2005, v. 11, n. 2, p. 89, doi. 10.1258/1356262053429633
- Article
35
- Clinical Risk, 2005, v. 11, n. 2, p. 78, doi. 10.1258/1356262053429642
- Article
36
- Clinical Risk, 2001, v. 7, n. 3, p. 99, doi. 10.1258/1356262011928202
- Balen, Paul;
- Hutter, Christopher D. D.
- Article
37
- Forensic Examiner, 2002, v. 11, n. 1/2, p. 38
- Article
38
- Health Matrix: Journal of Law-Medicine, 2021, v. 31, p. 1
- Article
39
- British Journal of Surgery, 2000, v. 87, n. 8, p. 977, doi. 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2000.01562.x
- Article