Works matching DE "TRADEMARK confusion"
1
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2018, v. 13, n. 5, p. 408, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpx204
- Article
2
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2017, v. 12, n. 4, p. 269, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpx033
- Cederlund, Karin;
- Malovic, Nedim
- Article
3
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2017, v. 12, n. 4, p. 266, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpx030
- Article
4
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2017, v. 12, n. 4, p. 278, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpx029
- Folliard-Monguiral, Arnaud;
- Rogers, David
- Article
5
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2016, v. 11, n. 3, p. 159, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpv238
- Article
6
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2015, v. 10, n. 6, p. 401, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpv062
- Article
7
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2014, v. 9, n. 8, p. 621, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpu062
- Article
8
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2014, v. 9, n. 8, p. 684, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpu083
- Article
9
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2014, v. 9, n. 8, p. 623, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpu086
- Article
10
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2014, v. 9, n. 2, p. 99, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpt228
- Ghalamkarizadeh, Anthonia
- Article
11
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2014, v. 9, n. 1, p. 13, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpt220
- Article
12
- Valparaiso University Law Review, 2012, v. 47, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
13
- New York University Law Review, 2013, v. 88, n. 6, p. 2220
- Article
14
- DePaul Journal of Art, Technology & Intellectual Property Law, 2015, v. 25, n. 2, p. 467
- Article
15
- Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, 2020, v. 38, n. 3, p. 745
- Article
16
- Texas Law Review, 2014, v. 92, n. 7, p. 2117
- Hyman, David A.;
- Franklyn, David J.
- Article
17
- Texas Law Review, 2014, v. 92, n. 7, p. 2029
- Seidman Diamond, Shari;
- Franklyn, David J.
- Article
18
- Minnesota Law Review, 2012, v. 96, n. 3, p. 769
- Article
19
- Brigham Young University Law Review, 2012, v. 2012, n. 2, p. 525
- Article
20
- Temple Law Review, 2022, v. 94, n. 2, p. 373
- Article
21
- San Diego International Law Journal, 2015, v. 16, n. 2, p. 457
- Article
22
- American University Law Review, 2022, v. 71, n. 4, p. 1285
- Article
23
- Lewis & Clark Law Review, 2017, v. 21, n. 2, p. 453
- Article
24
- Boston College Law Review, 2017, v. 58, n. 1, p. 257
- Article
25
- Northwestern University Law Review, 2012, v. 106, n. 3, p. 1307
- Article
26
- Journal of Intellectual Property & Entertainment Law, 2014, v. 4, n. 1, p. 95
- VOLOKH, EUGENE;
- DOLAN, MAIREAD
- Article
27
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law, 2015, v. 22, n. 2, p. 463
- Article
28
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law, 2012, v. 20, n. 1, p. 149
- Article
29
- Journal of the Missouri Bar, 2016, v. 72, n. 3, p. 136
- Article
30
- Iowa Law Review, 2017, v. 103, n. 1, p. 367
- Article
31
- Advocate (05154987), 2019, v. 62, n. 9, p. 22
- Article
32
- Advocate (05154987), 2016, v. 59, n. 5, p. 38
- Article
33
- Akron Law Review, 2015, v. 49, n. 3, p. 627
- Article
34
- American University Law Review, 2014, v. 63, n. 4, p. 1419
- POLOTT, ANITA B.;
- JUSTUS, DANA N.
- Article
35
- Connecticut Journal of International Law, 2011, v. 27, n. 1, p. 39
- Article