Appointed Person rejects appeal that two DG decisions are inconsistent.
- Published in:
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2020, v. 15, n. 1, p. 5, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpz155
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Works matching DE "TRADEMARK cancellation"
Results: 10
1
2
The General Court says no to (one of) the Adidas three-stripe mark(s).
- Published in:
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2019, v. 14, n. 10, p. 746, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpz105
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
3
The battle of the Gs: GC rules that use of the Guess logo does not infringe earlier Gucci marks.
- Published in:
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2017, v. 12, n. 4, p. 266, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpx030
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
4
EU trade mark round-up 2016.
- Published in:
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2017, v. 12, n. 4, p. 278, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpx029
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
5
‘Trade marks’ that aren't signs or that are so imprecise as to be incapable of registration.
- Published in:
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2013, v. 8, n. 5, p. 353, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpt046
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
6
UNELE OPINII PRIVIND ANULAREA DECIZIEI DE ÎNREGISTRARE A MĂRCII.
- Published in:
- Romanian Journal of Intellectual Property Law / Revista Română de Dreptul Proprietăţii Intelectuale, 2012, n. 3, p. 158
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
7
SOME ASPECTS REGARDING THE ANNULMENT OF THE REGISTERED TRADEMARK.
- Published in:
- Knowledge Horizons / Orizonturi ale Cunoasterii, 2017, v. 9, n. 2, p. 10
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
8
THE CHALLENGES OF PRIOR USE TO NEW ZEALAND REGISTERED TRADE MARK LAW.
- Published in:
- Victoria University of Wellington Law Review, 2014, v. 45, n. 2, p. 257
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
9
DISCRIMINATORY DISCRETION: PTO PROCEDURES AND VIEWPOINT DISCRIMINATION UNDER SECTION 2(A) OF THE LANHAM ACT.
- Published in:
- 2016
- By:
- Publication type:
- Opinion
10
MISSING THE MARK: HOW LEGISLATIVE ADJUSTMENTS TO THE DISPARAGEMENT CLAUSE COULD PROMOTE THE REVOCATION OF TRADEMARKS FOR PROFESSIONAL SPORTING TEAMS REFERENCING NATIVE AMERICAN CULTURE.
- Published in:
- Jeffrey S. Moorad Sports Law Journal, 2024, v. 31, n. 1, p. 183
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article