Works matching DE "TEXTUALISM (Legal interpretation)"
1
- Journal of Law & Policy, 2025, v. 33, n. 2, p. 2
- Article
2
- Brigham Young University Law Review, 2025, v. 50, n. 3, p. 829
- Article
3
- Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts, 2021, v. 44, n. 3, p. 411, doi. 10.52214/jla.v44i3.8101
- Article
4
- Narrative, 2021, v. 29, n. 2, p. 178, doi. 10.1353/nar.2021.0010
- Article
5
- California Law Review, 2023, v. 111, p. 1929, doi. 10.15779/Z38BG2HB7S
- Article
6
- California Law Review, 2020, v. 108, n. 6, p. 1995, doi. 10.15779/Z38804XK6V
- Article
7
- Právník, 2024, v. 163, n. 9, p. 986
- Article
8
- George Washington Law Review Arguendo, 2017, v. 85, n. 3, p. 857
- Article
9
- University of New Hampshire Law Review, 2023, v. 21, n. 2, p. 261
- Article
10
- Journal of the Legal Profession, 2020, v. 44, n. 2, p. 243
- Article
11
- Texas Review of Law & Politics, 2023, v. 28, n. 1, p. 125
- Article
12
- Texas Review of Law & Politics, 2016, v. 21, n. 1, p. 235
- Article
14
- U.C. Davis Law Review, 2016, v. 49, n. 3, p. 1097
- Article
15
- Touro Law Review, 2017, v. 33, n. 3, p. 749
- Article
16
- African Journal of International & Comparative Law, 2025, v. 33, n. 2, p. 312, doi. 10.3366/ajicl.2025.0526
- Article
17
- African Journal of International & Comparative Law, 2019, v. 27, n. 2, p. 203, doi. 10.3366/ajicl.2019.0269
- Article
18
- San Diego Law Review, 2022, v. 59, n. 4, p. 599
- Article
19
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2023, v. 46, n. 3, p. 1331
- Article
20
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2023, v. 46, n. 3, p. i
- Article
21
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2023, v. 46, p. 671
- Article
22
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2019, v. 42, n. 2, p. 649
- Article
23
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2015, v. 38, n. 2, p. 711
- Article
28
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2013, v. 36, n. 3, p. 977
- Article
29
- New York University Journal of Law & Liberty, 2017, v. 11, n. 3, p. 893
- Article
30
- New York University Journal of Law & Liberty, 2014, v. 8, n. 2, p. 342
- Article
32
- New York University Journal of Law & Liberty, 2011, v. 6, n. 2, p. 231
- Article
33
- BYU Journal of Public Law, 2011, v. 26, n. 1, p. 73
- Article
34
- Brigham Young University Law Review, 2024, v. 49, n. 5, p. 1319
- Article
35
- Brigham Young University Law Review, 2017, v. 2017, n. 6, p. 1503
- Article
36
- Hermeneia: Journal of Hermeneutics, Art Theory & Criticism, 2018, n. 21, p. 217
- ASĂVOAIE, Cristiana-Maria
- Article
37
- Michigan Journal of Environmental & Administrative Law, 2012, v. 1, n. 1, p. 287, doi. 10.36640/mjeal.1.1.text
- Article
38
- Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai, Iurisprudentia, 2024, v. 69, n. 4, p. 13, doi. 10.24193/SUBBiur.69(2024).4.13-90
- Article
40
- George Mason University Civil Rights Law Journal, 2013, v. 23, n. 3, p. 283
- Article
41
- George Mason Law Review, 2025, v. 32, n. 1, p. 105
- Article
42
- George Mason Law Review, 2019, v. 26, p. 1
- Article
43
- Alberta Law Review, 2024, v. 61, n. 3, p. 671
- Article
44
- Alberta Law Review, 2022, v. 60, n. 1, p. 35, doi. 10.29173/alr2710
- Article
45
- Alabama Law Review, 2024, v. 76, n. 2, p. 223
- McGinnis, John O.;
- Rappaport, Michael B.
- Article
46
- Southern California Law Review, 2012, v. 85, n. 5, p. 1413
- Article
47
- Southern Illinois University Law Journal, 2016, v. 41, n. 1, p. 29
- Article
48
- Southern Illinois University Law Journal, 2013, v. 37, n. 2, p. 337
- Blundi Sturzenegger, Thiago Luiz
- Article
49
- Hungarian Journal of Legal Studies, 2015, v. 56, n. 2/3, p. 158, doi. 10.1556/026.2015.56.2-3.5
- Article
50
- William & Mary Law Review, 2025, v. 66, n. 6, p. 1389
- Article