Works matching DE "TERMINATION of parental rights"
1
- Review of Law & Social Change, 2017, v. 41, n. 4, p. 685
- Article
2
- Southern Illinois University Law Journal, 2019, v. 43, n. 3, p. 749
- Blitchington, Bethany Gale
- Article
3
- Annals of 'Constantin Brancusi' University of Targu-Jiu. Juridical Science Series, 2015, n. 1, p. 53
- Article
4
- Suffolk Transnational Law Review, 2013, v. 36, n. 1, p. 223
- Article
5
- Florida Bar Journal, 2012, v. 86, n. 5, p. 46
- Campbell, Sarah J.;
- Rosenberg, Robin L.
- Article
6
- New York University Law Review, 2012, v. 87, n. 5, p. 1570
- Article
7
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform, 2016, v. 49, n. 3, p. 689, doi. 10.36646/mjlr.49.3.when
- Article
8
- University of Miami Law Review, 2013, v. 68, n. 1, p. 323
- Article
9
- Law of Ukraine / Pravo Ukrainy, 2013, n. 10, p. 210
- Article
10
- William Mitchell Law Review, 2014, v. 40, n. 3, p. 1143
- Article
11
- William Mitchell Law Review, 2014, v. 40, n. 3, p. 1083
- Gueinzius, Anne Tyler;
- Hillel, Julia
- Article
12
- William Mitchell Law Review, 2014, v. 40, n. 3, p. 1008
- Driver, Stacia Walling;
- Walling, Wright S.
- Article
13
- William Mitchell Law Review, 2014, v. 40, n. 3, p. 990
- Article
14
- William Mitchell Law Review, 2014, v. 40, n. 3, p. 890
- Meyer, Helen;
- Cary, Robert
- Article
15
- Pace Law Review, 2014, v. 34, n. 2, p. 509, doi. 10.58948/2331-3528.1856
- Article
16
- Bench & Bar of Minnesota, 2018, v. 75, n. 3, p. 37
- INTERMILL, JESSICA;
- RADEMACHER, PETER J.
- Article
17
- Bench & Bar of Minnesota, 2010, v. 67, n. 11, p. 42
- Article
18
- Social Sciences (2076-0760), 2021, v. 10, n. 6, p. 190, doi. 10.3390/socsci10060190
- Article
19
- Brigham Young University Law Review, 2012, v. 2012, n. 1, p. 281
- Article
20
- Psychology, Crime & Law, 2012, v. 18, n. 1, p. 95, doi. 10.1080/1068316X.2011.589388
- Summers, Alicia;
- Gatowski, Sophia;
- Dobbin, Shirley
- Article
21
- Touro Law Review, 2017, v. 33, n. 2, p. 517
- Article
22
- Hofstra Law Review, 2013, v. 42, n. 1, p. 303
- Article
23
- Oxford Journal of Law & Religion, 2013, v. 2, n. 2, p. 470, doi. 10.1093/ojlr/rwt030
- Article
24
- Utah Bar Journal, 2017, v. 30, n. 2, p. 25
- Parker, Rodney R.;
- Cepemich, Dani N.;
- Elder, Scott A.;
- Mitchell, Nathanael J.;
- Pace, Adam M.
- Article
26
- Family Law Quarterly, 2017, v. 51, n. 2/3, p. 255
- Article
27
- Family Law Quarterly, 2017, v. 51, n. 2/3, p. 219
- Article
28
- Family Law Quarterly, 2013, v. 47, n. 3, p. 437
- Article
29
- Family Law Quarterly, 2013, v. 46, n. 4, p. 543
- Article
30
- Indiana Law Review, 2022, v. 54, n. 4, p. 943, doi. 10.18060/26100
- SEIDLER, RENA;
- LABONTE, KATHERINE
- Article
31
- Family Court Review, 2016, v. 54, n. 2, p. 221, doi. 10.1111/fcre.12222
- Article
32
- Michigan Journal of Gender & Law, 2020, v. 27, n. 2, p. 311, doi. 10.36641/mjgl.27.2.stability
- Article
33
- Stanford Law & Policy Review, 2015, v. 26, n. 1, p. 307
- Article
34
- Roger Williams University Law Review, 2012, v. 17, n. 2, p. 571
- Article
35
- Quinnipiac Probate Law Journal, 2017, v. 30, n. 3, p. 199
- Article
36
- Quinnipiac Probate Law Journal, 2016, v. 29, n. 4, p. 365
- Article
37
- Quinnipiac Probate Law Journal, 2015, v. 28, n. 2, p. 118
- Article
38
- Arkansas Law Review (1968-present), 2015, v. 68, n. 2, p. 605
- Article
39
- South Carolina Law Review, 2011, v. 62, n. 4, p. 697
- Article
40
- New Mexico Law Review, 2020, v. 50, n. 1, p. 187
- Article
41
- Mitchell Hamline Law Review, 2024, v. 50, n. 1, p. 116
- Article
42
- Law & Psychology Review, 2015, v. 39, p. 205
- Article
43
- Boston College Journal of Law & Social Justice, 2012, v. 32, n. 1, p. 63
- Article
45
- Revista de Derecho UNED, 2014, n. 14, p. 797, doi. 10.5944/rduned.14.2014.13306
- SOLLEIRO, SILVIA PAINCEIRAS
- Article
46
- Advocate (05154987), 2013, v. 56, n. 3/4, p. 41
- Article
47
- Advocate (05154987), 2013, v. 56, n. 2, p. 52
- Article
48
- Georgia Law Review, 2016, v. 50, n. 4, p. 1269
- Article