Funny or Harmful?: Derogatory Speech on Fox’s Family Guy.
- Published in:
- Communication Studies, 2012, v. 63, n. 2, p. 119, doi. 10.1080/10510974.2011.638412
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Works matching DE "TELEVISION programs -- Law %26 legislation"
Results: 17
1
2
Deregulation and Public Perceptions of Television: A Longitudinal Study.
- Published in:
- Communication Studies, 1990, v. 41, n. 3, p. 266, doi. 10.1080/10510979009368308
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
3
The Battle for the Remote Control--Has the FCC Indecency Policy Worn Out its Welcome in America's Living Room?
- Published in:
- Washington University Journal of Law & Policy, 2012, v. 38, p. 357
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
4
FREE TO AIR--LEGAL PROTECTION FOR TV PROGRAM FORMATS.
- Published in:
- IDEA: The Intellectual Property Law Review, 2011, v. 51, n. 2, p. 211
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
5
ALL THE WORLD'S A STAGE, BUT WHAT IS A DRAMATIC WORK?
- Published in:
- Singapore Journal of Legal Studies, 2020, p. 702
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
6
CAUGHT IN THE ACT OF PICTURING.
- Published in:
- Cardozo Law Review, 2010, v. 31, n. 4, p. 1301
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
7
Federal Preemption of Obscenity Law Applied to Cable Television.
- Published in:
- Journalism Quarterly, 1986, v. 63, n. 1, p. 43, doi. 10.1177/107769908606300107
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
8
ACT Files at FCC Against Program-Length Ads.
- Published in:
- Journalism Quarterly, 1983, v. 60, n. 3, p. 579
- Publication type:
- Article
9
TELEVISION FORMATS AS (UN)PROTECTED INTELLECTUAL GOODS.
- Published in:
- Annals of the Faculty of Law in Belgrade, 2014, v. 62, n. 1, p. 84
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
10
‘It’s not like the Germans to take something that wasn’t theirs’.
- Published in:
- Critical Studies in Television, 2018, v. 13, n. 2, p. 188, doi. 10.1177/1749602018763690
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
11
What Good Is Fame If You Can't Be Famous in Your Own Right?: Publicity Right Woes of the Almost Famous.
- Published in:
- 2012
- By:
- Publication type:
- Opinion
12
FOREWORD.
- Published in:
- Law & Contemporary Problems, 1982, v. 45, n. 1, p. 1
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
13
Television's Power Relations in the Transition to Digital: The Case of the United Kingdom.
- Published in:
- Television & New Media, 2008, v. 9, n. 3, p. 239, doi. 10.1177/1527476407313822
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
14
AGGREGATION ANALYSIS IN COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT CLAIMS: THE FATE OF FICTIONAL FACTS.
- Published in:
- Columbia Law Review, 2015, v. 115, n. 3, p. 661
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
15
Mockbusters, "Rip-Offs," and Tie-Ins: Musings on the Free Use of Ideas on Film and Television from a Justice Philosophy Perspective.
- Published in:
- Ateneo Law Journal, 2010, v. 54, n. 4, p. 850
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
16
Unflagging Television Piracy: How Piracy of Japanese Television Programming in East Asia Portends Failure for a U.S. Broadcast Flag.
- Published in:
- Texas Law Review, 2006, v. 84, n. 5, p. 1317
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
17
Media, Publishing & Entertainment.
- Published in:
- China Business Review, 2006, v. 33, n. 3, p. 10
- Publication type:
- Article