THERE'S NO PLACE LIKE "HOME": § 162(A)(2) AND WHY MARRIED TAXPAYERS JUST CAN'T GET "AWAY".
- Published in:
- Emory Law Journal, 2010, v. 59, n. 4, p. 969
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Works matching DE "TAXATION of marriage"
Results: 18
1
2
THE ERROR COST OF MARRIAGE.
- Published in:
- New York University Journal of Legislation & Public Policy, 2021, v. 23, n. 2, p. 643
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
3
BEYOND THE MARRIAGE TAX TRILEMMA.
- Published in:
- Wake Forest Law Review, 2019, v. 54, n. 3, p. 661
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
4
Does the Marriage Tax Differential Influence Same‐Sex Couples' Marriage Decisions?
- Published in:
- Journal of Marriage & Family, 2021, v. 83, n. 1, p. 152, doi. 10.1111/jomf.12735
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
5
FINDING CERTAINTY IN DETERMINING WHETHER A "DE FACTO RELATIONSHIP" EXISTS: AN IMPOSSIBLE TASK?
- Published in:
- Canterbury Law Review, 2015, v. 21, p. 112
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
6
Zur Benachteiligung kinderreicher Familien im Vergleich von Zusammenveranlagung und Einzelveranlagung.
- Published in:
- FinanzRundschau, 2020, v. 102, n. 16, p. 766, doi. 10.9785/fr-2020-1021605
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
7
Tagungs- und Diskussionsbericht zum Webinar des 74. Berliner Steuergesprächs „Familienbesteuerung – Ist das Steuerrecht auf der Höhe der Zeit?".
- Published in:
- FinanzRundschau, 2020, v. 102, n. 16, p. 757, doi. 10.9785/fr-2020-1021603
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
8
Editorial Note: Women and the Global 1970s.
- Published in:
- Journal of Women's History, 2018, v. 30, n. 2, p. 7, doi. 10.1353/jowh.2018.0011
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
9
Creating the Marriage Penalty: Tax Politics, Gender, and Political Realignment in 1970s America.
- Published in:
- Journal of Women's History, 2018, v. 30, n. 2, p. 136, doi. 10.1353/jowh.2018.0017
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
10
Negative Social and Economic Effects of the Marriage Penalty Tax on Women and Society.
- Published in:
- Journal of Accounting & Finance (2158-3625), 2018, v. 18, n. 5, p. 86, doi. 10.33423/jaf.v18i5.35
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
11
Professionals' Tax Liability Assessments and Ethical Evaluations in an Equitable Relief Innocent Spouse Case.
- Published in:
- Journal of Business Ethics, 2003, v. 42, n. 1, p. 27, doi. 10.1023/A:1021634900211
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
12
BACK TO THE FUTURE: MARRIAGE AND DIVORCE UNDER THE 2017 TAX ACT.
- Published in:
- St. Mary's Law Journal, 2019, v. 51, n. 1, p. 1
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
13
Marriage, the Family and Contemporary American Politics.
- Published in:
- Parliamentary Affairs, 2001, v. 54, n. 3, p. 509, doi. 10.1093/parlij/54.3.509
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
14
Senior Citizens and the 'Marriage Tax' on Social Security Benefits.
- Published in:
- CPA Journal, 2012, v. 82, n. 2, p. 54
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
15
20 Questions on Marriage and Taxes.
- Published in:
- CPA Journal, 2011, v. 81, n. 12, p. 38
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
16
THE MARRIAGE TAX: CURRENT EFFECTS AND FUTURE CHANGES.
- Published in:
- CPA Journal, 2002, v. 72, n. 10, p. 68
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
17
IRS says that `domestic partner' fringe benefits ...
- Published in:
- CPA Journal, 1997, v. 67, n. 7, p. 12
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
18
PRIORITIZING DIVERSITY AND AUTONOMY IN THE POLYGAMY LEGALIZATION DEBATE.
- Published in:
- UCLA Women's Law Journal, 2017, v. 24, n. 2, p. 107, doi. 10.5070/l3242037776
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article