Works matching DE "SUPREME People's Court (China)"
1
- Chinese Journal of International Law, 2024, v. 23, n. 4, p. 867, doi. 10.1093/chinesejil/jmae037
- Article
2
- Chinese Journal of International Law, 2023, v. 22, n. 4, p. 851, doi. 10.1093/chinesejil/jmad043
- Article
3
- Chinese Journal of International Law, 2022, v. 21, n. 4, p. 827, doi. 10.1093/chinesejil/jmac041
- Article
4
- Chinese Journal of International Law, 2021, v. 20, n. 3, p. 581, doi. 10.1093/chinesejil/jmab031
- Article
5
- Chinese Journal of International Law, 2020, v. 19, n. 3, p. 525, doi. 10.1093/chinesejil/jmaa032
- Article
6
- Chinese Journal of International Law, 2019, v. 18, n. 4, p. 933, doi. 10.1093/chinesejil/jmz035
- Article
7
- Chinese Journal of International Law, 2018, v. 17, n. 4, p. 1101, doi. 10.1093/chinesejil/jmy028
- Law, Qisheng HE Professor of International
- Article
8
- Chinese Journal of International Law, 2017, v. 16, n. 4, p. 787, doi. 10.1093/chinesejil/jmx035
- Article
9
- Chinese Journal of International Law, 2016, v. 15, n. 4, p. 859, doi. 10.1093/chinesejil/jmw042
- Article
10
- Chinese Journal of International Law, 2009, v. 8, n. 2, p. 423, doi. 10.1093/chinesejil/jmp018
- YU Shuhong;
- XIAO Yongping;
- WANG Baoshi
- Article
11
- Chinese Journal of International Law, 2005, v. 4, n. 2, p. 647, doi. 10.1093/chinesejil/jmi027
- Article
12
- Chinese Journal of International Law, 2003, v. 2, n. 1, p. 387, doi. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.cjilaw.a000478
- Article
13
- Chinese Journal of International Law, 2003, v. 2, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.cjilaw.a000463
- Article
14
- Artificial Intelligence & Law, 2024, v. 32, n. 2, p. 463, doi. 10.1007/s10506-023-09358-7
- Chen, Benjamin M.;
- Li, Zhiyu;
- Cai, David;
- Ash, Elliott
- Article
15
- Contemporary Social Sciences, 2021, v. 6, n. 6, p. 53, doi. 10.19873/j.cnki.2096-0212.2021.06.004
- Article
16
- Eurasian Geography & Economics, 2022, v. 63, n. 2, p. 271, doi. 10.1080/15387216.2021.2004183
- Article
17
- Willamette Journal of International Law & Dispute Resolution, 2011, v. 19, n. 2, p. 327
- Article
18
- Tibetan Review: The Monthly Magazine on all Aspects of Tibet, 2008, v. 43, n. 1, p. 28
- Article
19
- Tibetan Review: The Monthly Magazine on all Aspects of Tibet, 2007, v. 42, n. 10, p. 32
- Article
20
- San Diego International Law Journal, 2018, v. 20, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
21
- Journal of Criminal Law, 2008, v. 72, n. 2, p. 113, doi. 10.1350/jcla.2008.72.2.486
- Article
22
- Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 2014, v. 21, n. 2, p. 683, doi. 10.2979/indjglolegstu.21.2.683
- Article
23
- International Journal of Online Dispute Resolution, 2017, v. 4, n. 2, p. 32, doi. 10.5553/ijodr/235250022017004002008
- Article
24
- British Journal of Criminology, 2013, v. 53, n. 3, p. 482
- Article
25
- Arbitration International, 2017, v. 33, n. 4, p. 647, doi. 10.1093/arbint/aiw009
- Article
26
- Internationales Handelsrecht, 2020, v. 20, n. 6, p. 230, doi. 10.9785/ihr-2020-200603
- Article
27
- Computer Law Review International, 2021, v. 22, n. 6, p. 190, doi. 10.9785/cri-2021-220608
- Article
28
- Chinese Journal of Comparative Law, 2023, v. 11, n. 2, p. 1, doi. 10.1093/cjcl/cxad006
- Article
29
- Chinese Journal of Comparative Law, 2020, v. 8, n. 2, p. 485, doi. 10.1093/cjcl/cxaa023
- Article
30
- Chinese Journal of Comparative Law, 2019, v. 7, n. 3, p. 505, doi. 10.1093/cjcl/cxaa001
- Article
31
- Chinese Journal of Comparative Law, 2016, v. 4, n. 2, p. 371, doi. 10.1093/cjcl/cxw012
- Article
32
- Chinese Journal of Comparative Law, 2016, v. 4, n. 2, p. 317, doi. 10.1093/cjcl/cxw011
- Article
33
- Chinese Journal of Comparative Law, 2014, v. 2, n. 2, p. 419, doi. 10.1093/cjcl/cxu013
- Article
34
- Chinese Journal of Comparative Law, 2014, v. 2, n. 1, p. 175, doi. 10.1093/cjcl/cxu001
- Article
35
- Chinese Journal of Comparative Law, 2013, v. 1, n. 2, p. 409, doi. 10.1093/cjcl/cxt022
- Article
36
- International Lawyer, 2024, v. 57, n. 1, p. 89
- Article
37
- Minnesota Law Review, 2018, v. 102, n. 4, p. 1527
- Article
38
- Journal of Coastal Research, 2020, v. 115, p. 133, doi. 10.2112/JCR-SI115-040.1
- Article
39
- Journal of Coastal Research, 2020, v. 115, p. 133, doi. 10.2112/JCR-SI115-040.1
- Article
40
- Journal of Antitrust Enforcement, 2022, v. 10, n. 2, p. 303, doi. 10.1093/jaenfo/jnab020
- Article
41
- Chinese Law & Government, 2017, v. 49, n. 2, p. 63, doi. 10.1080/00094609.2017.1341799
- Article
42
- Chinese Law & Government, 2017, v. 49, n. 2, p. 83, doi. 10.1080/00094609.2017.1318592
- Article
43
- Chinese Law & Government, 2017, v. 49, n. 2, p. 101, doi. 10.1080/00094609.2017.1318588
- Article
44
- Chinese Law & Government, 2017, v. 49, n. 2, p. 65, doi. 10.1080/00094609.2017.1318583
- Article
45
- Chinese Law & Government, 2010, v. 43, n. 5, p. 40, doi. 10.2753/CLG0009-4609430506
- Supreme People's Court, Supreme People's Procuratorate
- Article
46
- Chinese Law & Government, 2010, v. 43, n. 4, p. 80, doi. 10.2753/CLG0009-4609430405
- Article
47
- Chinese Law & Government, 2009, v. 42, n. 1, p. 94, doi. 10.2753/CLG0009-4609420111
- Article
48
- Chinese Law & Government, 2009, v. 42, n. 1, p. 81, doi. 10.2753/CLG0009-4609420109
- Article
49
- Chinese Law & Government, 2009, v. 42, n. 1, p. 85, doi. 10.2753/CLG0009-4609420110
- Article
50
- Chinese Law & Government, 2009, v. 42, n. 1, p. 36, doi. 10.2753/CLG0009-4609420107
- Article