Works matching DE "SUPREME Court justices (U.S.)"
1
- North Carolina Law Review, 2025, v. 103, n. 4, p. 1083
- Article
2
- Vanderbilt Law Review, 2025, v. 78, n. 3, p. 727
- Article
3
- Ohio State Law Journal, 2024, v. 85, n. 6, p. 1055
- Article
4
- Ohio State Law Journal, 2024, v. 85, n. 6, p. 983
- Article
5
- Brigham Young University Law Review, 2025, v. 50, n. 3, p. 681
- Article
6
- American Jewish History, 2024, v. 108, n. 2, p. 207, doi. 10.1353/ajh.2024.a959967
- Article
7
- Society for Commercial Archeology Journal, 2025, p. 2
- Article
8
- Political Analysis, 2019, v. 27, n. 8, p. 237, doi. 10.1017/pan.2018.47
- Dietrich, Bryce J.;
- Enos, Ryan D.;
- Sen, Maya
- Article
9
- Political Analysis, 2017, v. 25, n. 1, p. 114, doi. 10.1017/pan.2016.10
- Article
12
- International Social Science Review, 2024, v. 100, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
13
- American Journal of Criminal Justice, 2014, v. 39, n. 4, p. 839, doi. 10.1007/s12103-014-9263-5
- Article
14
- American Journal of Criminal Justice, 2013, v. 38, n. 3, p. 422, doi. 10.1007/s12103-012-9180-4
- Article
15
- Review of Law & Social Change, 2011, v. 35, n. 3, p. 602
- Article
16
- Studies in Gender & Sexuality, 2018, v. 19, n. 4, p. 233, doi. 10.1080/15240657.2018.1531507
- Article
18
- California Law Review, 2019, v. 107, n. 1, p. 67, doi. 10.15779/Z38ZK55M67
- Article
19
- George Washington Law Review Arguendo, 2019, v. 87, n. 4, p. 996
- Article
20
- George Washington Law Review Arguendo, 2017, v. 85, n. 3, p. 800
- Article
21
- George Washington Law Review Arguendo, 2012, v. 80, n. 6, p. 1601
- Article
22
- William & Mary Business Law Review, 2018, v. 10, n. 1, p. 61
- Article
24
- Feminist Media Studies, 2024, v. 24, n. 7, p. 1482, doi. 10.1080/14680777.2023.2243048
- Article
25
- Journal of Values Based Leadership, 2025, v. 18, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
26
- Journal of Values Based Leadership, 2025, v. 18, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
27
- Southern Law Journal, 2017, v. 27, n. 1, p. 149
- USNICK, WILLIAM;
- USNICK, LEE
- Article
29
- North Carolina Historical Review, 2022, v. 99, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
30
- Texas Review of Law & Politics, 2021, v. 26, n. 2, p. 355
- Article
31
- Texas Review of Law & Politics, 2019, v. 24, n. 2, p. 299
- Article
32
- Texas Review of Law & Politics, 2019, v. 23, n. 3, p. 601
- Article
33
- Political Science Reviewer, 2018, v. 42, n. 2, p. 357
- Article
34
- U.C. Davis Law Review, 2015, v. 48, n. 4, p. 1207
- Article
35
- U.C. Davis Law Review, 2013, v. 47, n. 1, p. 343
- Article
36
- Touro Law Review, 2024, v. 39, n. 4, p. 1147
- Article
37
- Touro Law Review, 2024, v. 39, n. 3, p. 871
- Article
39
- Touro Law Review, 2024, v. 39, n. 3, p. 805
- Article
40
- Touro Law Review, 2024, v. 39, n. 3, p. 835
- Article
41
- Touro Law Review, 2024, v. 39, n. 3, p. 795
- Article
43
- Touro Law Review, 2024, v. 39, n. 3, p. 777
- Article
44
- Touro Law Review, 2021, v. 37, n. 2, p. 533
- Article
45
- Touro Law Review, 2018, v. 34, n. 3, p. 741
- Article
46
- Touro Law Review, 2017, v. 33, n. 3, p. 749
- Article
47
- St. John's Law Review, 2024, v. 98, n. 1, p. 121
- Article