Works matching DE "SUPREME Court justices (U.S.)"
1
- Journal of Church & State, 2025, v. 67, n. 3, p. 1, doi. 10.1093/jcs/csaf046
- Article
2
- University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 2025, v. 173, n. 7, p. 1935, doi. 10.58112/uplr.173-7.3
- Article
3
- University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 2025, v. 173, n. 7, p. 2151, doi. 10.58112/uplr.173-7.10
- Article
4
- Reviews in American History, 2025, v. 53, n. 2, p. 121, doi. 10.1353/rah.2025.a963503
- Article
5
- Cardozo Law Review, 2025, v. 46, n. 6, p. 1855
- Article
6
- Roger Williams University Law Review, 2025, v. 30, n. 3, p. 661
- Article
7
- Roger Williams University Law Review, 2025, v. 30, n. 3, p. 470
- Fischer, Stefanie D.;
- Erickson, Colten H.
- Article
8
- Ecology Law Quarterly, 2024, v. 51, n. 2, p. 349, doi. 10.15779/Z38CF9J84K
- Siu Hing Taylor Li, Grace
- Article
9
- Ecology Law Quarterly, 2024, v. 51, n. 2, p. 307, doi. 10.15779/Z386688M5J
- Article
10
- St. John's Law Review, 2025, v. 98, n. 7, p. 1421
- Article
11
- Communication Law & Policy, 2024, v. 29, n. 4, p. 309, doi. 10.1080/10811680.2025.2508154
- Article
12
- Yale Law Journal, 2017, v. 126, n. 6, p. 1629
- Article
13
- Yale Law Journal, 2017, v. 126, n. 6, p. 1609
- Article
14
- Yale Law Journal, 2017, v. 126, n. 6, p. 1605
- Article
15
- Yale Law Journal, 2017, v. 126, n. 6, p. 1600
- Article
16
- University of Chicago Law Review, 2020, v. 87, n. 8, p. 2175
- Article
18
- University of Chicago Law Review, 2013, v. 80, n. 4, p. 1625
- Article
19
- University of Miami Law Review, 2019, v. 74, n. 1, p. 109
- Article
20
- Canadian Tax Journal / Revue Fiscale Canadienne, 2014, v. 62, n. 1, p. 113
- Article
21
- New York University Law Review, 2022, v. 97, n. 5, p. 1353
- Article
22
- New York University Law Review, 2015, v. 90, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
23
- Plymouth Law Review, 2022, v. 15, p. 1
- Article
24
- Columbia Journal of Gender & Law, 2022, v. 53, p. 58, doi. 10.52214/cjgl.vi.9700
- Article
25
- Boston College Law Review, 2024, v. 65, n. 7, p. 2405, doi. 10.70167/jwsp8736
- Article
26
- Maryland Law Review, 2024, v. 84, n. 1, p. 46
- STIGLITZ, EDWARD H.;
- THALKEN, ROSAMOND
- Article
27
- Studies in Gender & Sexuality, 2018, v. 19, n. 4, p. 233, doi. 10.1080/15240657.2018.1531507
- Article
28
- Duke Law Journal, 2011, v. 61, n. 1, p. 81
- McElroy, Lisa T.;
- Dorf, Michael C.
- Article
29
- Columbia Law Review, 2021, v. 121, n. 8, p. 2317
- Pozen, David E.;
- Schmidt, Thomas P.
- Article
30
- Columbia Law Review, 2020, v. 120, n. 7, p. 1885
- Article
31
- Columbia Law Review, 2020, v. 120, n. 2, p. 309
- Article
32
- American Law & Economics Review, 2018, v. 20, n. 1, p. 105, doi. 10.1093/aler/ahx020
- Bailey, Michael A.;
- Spitzer, Matthew
- Article
33
- American Law & Economics Review, 2015, v. 17, n. 2, p. 529, doi. 10.1093/aler/ahv014
- Bustos, Álvaro;
- Jacobi, Tonja
- Article
34
- Southwestern Law Review, 2024, v. 52, n. 3, p. 512
- Schwartz, Victor E.;
- Appel, Christopher E.
- Article
35
- Southwestern Law Review, 2016, v. 45, n. 2, p. 101
- Lindenfeld, Eric;
- Tran, Jasper L.
- Article
36
- California Legal History, 2024, v. 19, p. 277
- MCCREERY, LAURA;
- CARTER, RYAN
- Article
37
- California Legal History, 2024, v. 19, p. 255
- Article
38
- California Legal History, 2024, v. 19, p. 37
- Article
39
- California Legal History, 2018, v. 13, n. 1, p. 11
- BRANDT-HAWLEY, SUSAN;
- CHATTEN-BROWN, JAN
- Article
40
- Journal of Values Based Leadership, 2025, v. 18, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
41
- Journal of Values Based Leadership, 2025, v. 18, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
42
- Law, Culture & the Humanities, 2016, v. 12, n. 1, p. 70, doi. 10.1177/1743872112453811
- Article
43
- Harvard Law & Policy Review, 2011, v. 5, n. 1, p. 163
- Article
44
- Cato Supreme Court Review, 2022, p. 275
- Article
45
- Cato Supreme Court Review, 2022, p. 9
- Article
46
- Cato Supreme Court Review, 2018, p. 215
- Gorod, Brianne J.;
- Frazelle, Brian R.
- Article
47
- Cato Supreme Court Review, 2018, p. 153
- Article
48
- Cato Supreme Court Review, 2018, p. 119
- Article
49
- Cato Supreme Court Review, 2018, p. 91
- Article
50
- Cato Supreme Court Review, 2018, p. 69
- Article