Works matching DE "SUMMARY judgments"
1
- Indiana Law Journal, 2022, v. 97, n. 4, p. 1479
- Article
2
- JOPERD: The Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 2011, v. 82, n. 6, p. 9, doi. 10.1080/07303084.2011.10598636
- Article
3
- JOPERD: The Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 2011, v. 82, n. 4, p. 9, doi. 10.1080/07303084.2011.10598605
- Article
4
- JOPERD: The Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 2010, v. 81, n. 1, p. 8
- Russell, Angela R.;
- Schaefer, George R.
- Article
5
- Visual Cognition, 2020, v. 28, n. 1, p. 41, doi. 10.1080/13506285.2020.1717706
- Ji, Luyan;
- Pourtois, Gilles;
- Sweeny, Timothy D.
- Article
6
- Florida Journal of International Law, 2011, v. 23, n. 3, p. 481
- Article
7
- Optometry Times, 2011, v. 3, n. 7, p. 8
- Article
8
- Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 2023, v. 17, n. 1, p. 186, doi. 10.1002/sej.1443
- Rapp, David J.;
- Olbrich, Michael
- Article
9
- Boston University Law Review, 2017, v. 97, n. 5, p. 1607
- GOLD, RUSSELL M.;
- BYRNE HESSICK, CARISSA;
- HESSICK, F. ANDREW
- Article
10
- Review of Litigation, 2013, v. 32, n. 3, p. 431
- Susman, Stephen D.;
- Melsheimer, Thomas M.
- Article
11
- Review of Litigation, 2000, v. 19, n. 3, p. 505
- Van Detta, Jeffrey A.;
- Gallipeau, Dan R.
- Article
12
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2016, v. 11, n. 7, p. 482, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpw071
- Article
13
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2014, v. 9, n. 2, p. 104, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpt240
- Article
14
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2013, v. 8, n. 5, p. 353, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpt046
- Article
15
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2013, v. 8, n. 1, p. 20, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jps157
- Article
16
- Law & Financial Markets Review, 2010, v. 4, n. 4, p. 439, doi. 10.5235/175214410791942832
- Article
17
- New York Law School Law Review, 2016, v. 61, n. 2, p. 269
- Article
18
- New York Law School Law Review, 2015, v. 60, n. 3/4, p. 675
- Article
19
- New York Law School Law Review, 2013, v. 58, n. 1, p. 215
- Article
20
- New York Law School Law Review, 2013, v. 57, n. 4, p. 865
- Article
21
- New York Law School Law Review, 2013, v. 57, n. 4, p. 841
- Article
22
- New York Law School Law Review, 2013, v. 57, n. 4, p. 815
- EISENBERG, DEBORAH THOMPSON
- Article
23
- 2013
- DONALD, BERNICE B.;
- PARDUE, J. ERIC
- Essay
24
- New York Law School Law Review, 2013, v. 57, n. 4, p. 685
- Article
26
- New York Law School Law Review, 2011, v. 55, n. 4, p. 1191
- Article
27
- New York Law School Law Review, 2009, v. 54, n. 2, p. 585
- Article
28
- Valparaiso University Law Review, 2013, v. 48, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
29
- South Dakota Law Review, 2017, v. 62, n. 2, p. 484
- Article
30
- South Dakota Law Review, 2017, v. 62, n. 2, p. 453
- Article
31
- Southern Illinois University Law Journal, 2018, v. 42, n. 3, p. 539
- Article
32
- Psychiatry, Psychology & Law, 2016, v. 23, n. 1, p. 37, doi. 10.1080/13218719.2015.1030011
- Article
33
- Psychiatry, Psychology & Law, 2013, v. 20, n. 2, p. 248, doi. 10.1080/13218719.2012.664846
- Article
34
- Psychiatry, Psychology & Law, 2013, v. 20, n. 2, p. 202, doi. 10.1080/13218719.2011.633488
- Cramer, RobertJ.;
- Wakeman, EmilyE.;
- Chandler, JosephF.;
- Mohr, JonathanJ.;
- Griffin, MichaelP.
- Article
35
- William & Mary Law Review, 2023, v. 65, n. 2, p. 389
- NASH, JONATHAN REMY;
- SOKOL, D. DANIEL
- Article
36
- William & Mary Law Review, 2018, v. 59, n. 3, p. 1097
- Article
37
- William & Mary Law Review, 1995, v. 36, n. 5, p. 1633
- Sinclair, Kent;
- Hanes, Patrick
- Article
38
- European Employment Law Cases, 2023, v. 8, n. 4, p. 193, doi. 10.5553/eelc/187791072023008004016
- Article
39
- Golden Gate University Law Review, 2014, v. 45, n. 1, p. 53
- Article
40
- Journal of Computer Engineering & Applications, 2024, v. 60, n. 4, p. 113, doi. 10.3778/j.issn.1002-8331.2209-0142
- YU Shuai;
- SONG Yumei;
- QIN Yongbin;
- HUANG Ruizhang;
- CHEN Yanping
- Article
41
- Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 2001, v. 28, p. 110, doi. 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2001.tb00049.x
- Article
42
- International Labour Review, 1989, v. 128, n. 2, p. 229
- Article
43
- Meritum: Revista de Direito da Universidade FUMEC, 2020, v. 15, n. 2, p. 235, doi. 10.46560/meritum.v15i2.8126
- CORDEIRO LEAL, ANDRÉ;
- LOTT THIBAU, VINÍCIUS
- Article
44
- Exceptional Children, 1984, v. 51, n. 2, p. 189
- Article
45
- California Law Review, 2018, v. 106, n. 2, p. 411, doi. 10.15779/Z38QV3C40V
- Article
46
- Communication Law & Policy, 2011, v. 16, n. 1, p. 89, doi. 10.1080/10811680.2011.536499
- Martin, Jason A.;
- Caramanica, Mark R.;
- Fargo, Anthony L.
- Article
47
- Washburn Law Journal, 2011, v. 50, n. 2, p. 511
- Article
48
- North Carolina Law Review, 2024, v. 102, n. 2, p. 459
- Article
49
- Houston Law Review, 2015, v. 52, n. 3, p. 773
- Hittner, Judge David;
- Liberato, Lynne
- Article
50
- Houston Law Review, 2012, v. 48, n. 5, p. 993
- Liberato, Lynne;
- Rutter, Kent
- Article