Works matching DE "STARE decisis"
1
- International Journal of Legal Information, 2019, v. 47, n. 2, p. 90, doi. 10.1017/jli.2019.21
- Article
2
- International Journal of Legal Information, 2013, v. 41, n. 1, p. 65, doi. 10.1017/S0731126500011641
- Article
3
- International Journal of Legal Information, 2012, v. 40, n. 1/2, p. 174, doi. 10.1017/S0731126500006466
- AHMAD, SHARIFAH SUHANAH SYED
- Article
4
- Law Library Journal, 2022, v. 114, n. 2, p. 167
- Article
5
- Perspectives on Political Science, 2004, v. 33, n. 3, p. 150, doi. 10.3200/PPSC.33.3.150-154
- Article
6
- Perspectives on Political Science, 2004, v. 33, n. 3, p. 142, doi. 10.3200/PPSC.33.3.142-149
- Article
7
- Brooklyn Law Review, 2014, v. 80, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
8
- Maryland Law Review, 2023, v. 83, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
9
- Human Life Review, 2014, v. 40, n. 3, p. 65
- Article
10
- Educational Theory, 2010, v. 60, n. 5, p. 639, doi. 10.1111/j.1741-5446.2010.00381.x
- Warnick, Bryan R.;
- Rowe, Bradley;
- Sang Hyun Kim
- Article
11
- California Law Review, 1918, v. 6, n. 6, p. 444
- Article
12
- California Law Review, 1915, v. 3, n. 6, p. 441, doi. 10.2307/3473932
- Article
13
- Antitrust Bulletin, 2007, v. 52, n. 3/4, p. 531, doi. 10.1177/0003603X0705200308
- Article
14
- Antitrust Bulletin, 2007, v. 52, n. 3/4, p. 475, doi. 10.1177/0003603X0705200307
- Article
15
- Boston University Law Review, 2017, v. 97, n. 6, p. 1947
- Article
16
- Boston University Law Review, 2015, v. 95, n. 1, p. 209
- Article
17
- Review of Litigation, 2024, v. 43, n. 2, p. 141
- Article
18
- Emory Law Journal, 2013, v. 62, n. 6, p. 1459
- Article
19
- Emory Law Journal, 2009, v. 58, n. 4, p. 831
- Article
20
- Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal, 2012, v. 12, n. 2, p. 261, doi. 10.5235/14729342.12.2.261
- Article
21
- Dalhousie Journal of Legal Studies, 2020, v. 29, p. 97
- Article
22
- St. John's Law Review, 2023, v. 97, n. 1, p. 115
- Article
24
- Albany Law Review, 2014, v. 77, n. 4, p. 1347
- Article
25
- Albany Law Review, 2012, v. 75, n. 2, p. 841
- Article
26
- Connecticut Law Review, 2010, v. 42, n. 3, p. 779
- Article
27
- 2015
- BOEGLIN, JACK;
- TARANTO, JULIUS
- Opinion
28
- Yale Law Journal, 2015, v. 124, n. 5, p. 1825
- Article
29
- William & Mary Law Review, 2002, v. 44, n. 1, p. 405
- Article
30
- Marketing Science, 2006, v. 25, n. 2, p. 109, doi. 10.1287/mksc.1060.0202
- Article
31
- Columbia Human Rights Law Review, 2022, v. 53, n. 3, p. 721
- Cepeda Derieux, Adriel I.;
- Cox Alomar, Rafael
- Article
32
- Brigham Young University Law Review, 1994, v. 1994, n. 3, p. 633
- Article
33
- Medical Law Review, 1996, v. 4, n. 1, p. 100, doi. 10.1093/medlaw/4.1.100
- Article
35
- Review of Constitutional Studies, 2014, v. 19, n. 2, p. 281
- Article
36
- Constitutional Forum / Forum Constitutionnel, 2019, v. 28, n. 3, p. 31, doi. 10.21991/cf29386
- Article
37
- Journal of Australian Taxation, 2014, v. 16, n. 1, p. 32
- Article
38
- University of Louisville Law Review, 2021, v. 60, n. 1, p. 57
- Ehrlich, Sam C.;
- Rodenberg, Ryan M.
- Article
39
- Mercer Law Review, 2021, v. 73, n. 1, p. 303
- Bagley, H. Michael;
- Ward, J. Benson
- Article
40
- Dalhousie Journal of Legal Studies, 2013, v. 22, p. 34
- Article
41
- Cardozo Law Review, 2016, v. 38, n. 2, p. 797
- Article
43
- Capital University Law Review, 2016, v. 44, n. 3, p. 461
- Article
44
- Alberta Law Review, 2018, v. 56, n. 1, p. 119, doi. 10.29173/alr2499
- Article
45
- Alberta Law Review, 2017, v. 55, n. 1, p. 225, doi. 10.29173/alr795
- Article
46
- Alberta Law Review, 2015, v. 53, n. 1, p. 207
- Article
47
- Alabama Law Review, 2019, v. 71, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
48
- Alabama Law Review, 2017, v. 69, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
49
- Akron Tax Journal, 2014, v. 29, p. 65
- Article
50
- Legislative Studies Quarterly, 2013, v. 38, n. 1, p. 31, doi. 10.1111/lsq.12002
- Article