Works matching DE "SPEECHWRITERS"
1
- Communication Teacher, 2000, v. 14, n. 3, p. 14, doi. 10.1080/29945054.2000.12290014
- Article
2
- Communication Quarterly, 2006, v. 54, n. 3, p. 351, doi. 10.1080/01463370600878321
- Pearson, JudyC.;
- Child, JeffreyT.;
- Kahl, DavidH.
- Article
3
- Communication Quarterly, 1988, v. 36, n. 2, p. 94, doi. 10.1080/01463378809369712
- Article
5
- Applied Linguistics, 2024, v. 45, n. 4, p. 621, doi. 10.1093/applin/amad048
- Article
7
- Journal of Business Ethics, 1996, v. 15, n. 7, p. 711, doi. 10.1007/BF00381736
- Riley, Linda A.;
- Brown, Stuart C.
- Article
8
- Journal of Business Ethics, 1992, v. 11, n. 7, p. 501, doi. 10.1007/BF00881441
- Article
10
- Talia Dixit, 2009, p. 29
- Article
11
- Cardozo Law Review, 2013, v. 34, n. 3, p. 937
- Article
12
- East Texas Historical Journal, 2006, v. 44, n. 1, p. 3
- Article
13
- Tijdschrift voor Communicatiewetenschap, 2015, v. 43, n. 3, p. 257, doi. 10.5117/2015.043.003.257
- Engele, Evelien;
- de Jong, Jaap
- Article
14
- Forensic, 2018, v. 103, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
15
- Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 1987, v. 31, n. 2, p. 119, doi. 10.1080/08838158709386652
- Article
16
- Vocabula Review, 2006, v. 8, n. 4, p. 1
- Article
17
- Vocabula Review, 2006, v. 8, n. 4, p. 1
- Article
18
- Vocabula Review, 2006, v. 8, n. 4, p. 1
- Article
19
- Communication, 1979, v. 8, n. 2, p. 1
- Article
20
- Today's Speech, 1972, v. 20, n. 2, p. 57, doi. 10.1080/01463377209369038
- Article
21
- Today's Speech, 1968, v. 16, n. 4, p. 71, doi. 10.1080/01463376809385514
- Article
22
- Today's Speech, 1967, v. 15, n. 2, p. 23, doi. 10.1080/01463376709368823
- Article
23
- Today's Speech, 1967, v. 15, n. 2, p. 5, doi. 10.1080/01463376709368815
- Article
24
- Journal of Business Communication, 1969, v. 7, n. 2, p. 29
- Dyer, Frederick C.;
- Dyer, John M.
- Article
25
- Mnemosyne, 2017, v. 70, n. 5, p. 872, doi. 10.1163/1568525X-12342393
- Article
26
- Mnemosyne, 2007, v. 60, n. 1, p. 59, doi. 10.1163/156852507X165847
- Article
28
- Rhetoric & Public Affairs, 1998, v. 1, n. 2, p. 227, doi. 10.1353/rap.2010.0002
- Article
29
- Rhetoric & Public Affairs, 1998, v. 1, n. 2, p. 201, doi. 10.1353/rap.2010.0000
- Article
30
- Public Relations Quarterly, 1988, v. 33, n. 2, p. 21
- Article
31
- Michigan Quarterly Review, 2022, v. 61, n. 4, p. 676
- Article
32
- ELH, 2020, v. 87, n. 3, p. 761, doi. 10.1353/elh.2020.0027
- Article
33
- International Communication Gazette, 2013, v. 75, n. 7, p. 597, doi. 10.1177/1748048513482542
- Waheed, Moniza;
- Schuck, Andreas;
- Neijens, Peter;
- de Vreese, Claes
- Article
34
- Oxford German Studies, 2016, v. 45, n. 1, p. 45, doi. 10.1080/00787191.2015.1128650
- Article
35
- Western Journal of Communication, 2004, v. 68, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.1080/10570310409374786
- Article
36
- Public Relations Tactics, 2015, v. 22, n. 2, p. 19
- Article
38
- Public Relations Tactics, 2008, v. 15, n. 10, p. 19
- Article
39
- Public Relations Tactics, 2005, v. 12, n. 2, p. 24
- Article
40
- Public Relations Tactics, 2004, v. 11, n. 1, p. 7
- Article
41
- Public Relations Tactics, 2004, v. 11, n. 1, p. 6
- Article
42
- Communication Education, 1984, v. 33, n. 4, p. 306
- Article