Works matching DE "SHELBY County v. Holder"
1
- Review of Law & Social Change, 2015, v. 39, n. 4, p. 111
- Article
2
- Review of Law & Social Change, 2015, v. 39, n. 2, p. 173
- Article
3
- California Law Review, 2024, v. 112, p. 461, doi. 10.15779/Z389882P22
- Article
4
- California Law Review, 2014, v. 102, n. 5, p. 1123
- Elmendorf, Christopher S.;
- Spencer, Douglas M.
- Article
5
- George Washington Law Review Arguendo, 2013, v. 81, n. 6, p. 1928
- Article
6
- U.C. Davis Law Review, 2016, v. 50, n. 1, p. 463
- Article
7
- U.C. Davis Law Review, 2013, v. 47, n. 1, p. 343
- Article
8
- Touro Law Review, 2015, v. 31, n. 4, p. 939
- Article
9
- Touro Law Review, 2015, v. 31, n. 2, p. 297
- Article
10
- Forum (2194-6183), 2018, v. 16, n. 2, p. 289, doi. 10.1515/for-2018-0014
- Article
11
- Boston College Journal of Law & Social Justice, 2014, v. 34, n. 1, p. 151
- Article
12
- Dissent (0012-3846), 2018, v. 65, n. 3, p. 111, doi. 10.1353/dss.2018.0060
- Article
13
- Brigham Young University Law Review, 2017, v. 2017, n. 3, p. 525
- Article
14
- University of Memphis Law Review, 2013, v. 44, n. 2, p. 357
- Article
15
- Southern California Law Review, 2024, v. 97, n. 1, p. 165
- Article
16
- University of Chicago Law Review, 2014, v. 81, n. 4, p. 1839
- Article
17
- Boston Review, 2013, v. 38, n. 5, p. 10
- Article
18
- Wisconsin Law Review, 2016, v. 2016, n. 6, p. 100
- Article
19
- Arizona Law Review, 2014, v. 56, n. 1, p. 281
- Article
20
- Harvard Political Review, 2013, v. 40, n. 2, p. 15
- Article
21
- Harvard Political Review, 2013, v. 40, n. 3, p. 22
- Article
22
- Harvard Law & Policy Review, 2014, v. 8, n. 1, p. 39
- Blacksher, James;
- Guinier, Lani
- Article
23
- Cato Supreme Court Review, 2012, p. 1
- Article
24
- Cato Supreme Court Review, 2012, p. vii
- Article
25
- Cato Supreme Court Review, 2012, p. 31
- Consovoy, William S.;
- McCarthy, Thomas R.
- Article
26
- Michigan Journal of Race & Law, 2017, v. 22, n. 2, p. 327, doi. 10.36643/mjrl.22.2.why
- Tucker, James Thomas;
- Landreth, Natalie A.;
- Lynch, Erin Dougherty
- Article
27
- Cardozo Law Review, 2016, v. 38, n. 2, p. 623
- Article
28
- Cardozo Law Review, 2015, v. 37, n. 2, p. 503
- Article
29
- Alabama Law Review, 2020, v. 71, n. 3, p. 793
- Article
30
- Iowa Law Review, 2015, v. 100, n. 4, p. 1389
- Charles, Guy-Uriel E.;
- Fuentes-Rohwe, Luis
- Article
31
- Iowa Law Review, 2014, v. 100, n. 1, p. 387
- Article
32
- Cultural Dynamics, 2014, v. 26, n. 1, p. 3, doi. 10.1177/0921374013510798
- da Silva, Denise Ferreira
- Article
34
- Denver University Law Review, 2012, v. 90, n. 2, p. 483
- Article
35
- National Lawyers Guild Review, 2016, v. 73, n. 2, p. 64
- Article
36
- National Lawyers Guild Review, 2013, v. 70, n. 4, p. 193
- Article
37
- National Lawyers Guild Review, 2013, v. 70, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
38
- SMU Law Review, 2014, v. 67, n. 1, p. 3
- Crayton, Kareem;
- Smith, Terry
- Article
39
- Cumberland Law Review, 2015, v. 45, n. 2, p. 303
- Article
40
- Criminal Justice Studies, 2017, v. 30, n. 3, p. 276, doi. 10.1080/1478601X.2017.1318343
- Carr, Collin M.;
- Schildkraut, Jaclyn;
- Rank, Allison
- Article
41
- Brooklyn Law Review, 2014, v. 80, n. 1, p. 223
- Article
42
- Boston University Law Review, 2019, v. 99, n. 2, p. 317
- Article
43
- Boston University Law Review, 2016, v. 96, n. 2, p. 361
- Article
44
- Boston University Law Review, 2015, v. 95, n. 2, p. 641
- Article
45
- Boston University Law Review, 2014, v. 94, n. 5, p. 1551
- Article
46
- Boston University Law Review, 2014, v. 94, n. 3, p. 697
- Article
47
- New York Law School Law Review, 2014, v. 59, n. 1, p. 17
- Article
48
- William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal, 2014, v. 23, n. 1, p. 301
- Article
49
- William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal, 2014, v. 22, n. 3, p. 713
- Article
50
- Washington University Journal of Law & Policy, 2017, v. 53, p. 269
- Article