Works matching DE "SHELBY County v. Holder"
2
- University of Chicago Law Review, 2014, v. 81, n. 4, p. 1839
- Article
3
- Criminal Justice Studies, 2017, v. 30, n. 3, p. 276, doi. 10.1080/1478601X.2017.1318343
- Carr, Collin M.;
- Schildkraut, Jaclyn;
- Rank, Allison
- Article
4
- Maryland Law Review, 2017, v. 77, n. 1, p. 192
- Article
5
- Columbia Law Review, 2017, v. 117, n. 8, p. 2185
- Article
6
- Columbia Law Review, 2015, v. 115, n. 8, p. 2143
- Elmendorf, Christopher S.;
- Spencer, Douglas M.
- Article
7
- Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy, 2019, v. 14, n. 1, p. 169
- Article
8
- Harvard Law & Policy Review, 2014, v. 8, n. 1, p. 39
- Blacksher, James;
- Guinier, Lani
- Article
9
- Cato Supreme Court Review, 2012, p. 1
- Article
10
- Cato Supreme Court Review, 2012, p. vii
- Article
11
- Cato Supreme Court Review, 2012, p. 31
- Consovoy, William S.;
- McCarthy, Thomas R.
- Article
12
- New York Law School Law Review, 2014, v. 59, n. 1, p. 17
- Article
13
- Washington University Journal of Law & Policy, 2017, v. 53, p. 269
- Article
14
- Washington University Journal of Law & Policy, 2017, v. 53, p. 269
- Article
15
- Washington University Journal of Law & Policy, 2015, v. 47, p. 151
- Article
16
- Washburn Law Journal, 2017, v. 56, n. 1, p. 109
- Article
17
- Cardozo Law Review, 2016, v. 38, n. 2, p. 623
- Article
18
- Cardozo Law Review, 2015, v. 37, n. 2, p. 503
- Article
19
- Southern California Law Review, 2024, v. 97, n. 1, p. 165
- Article
20
- Ohio State Law Journal, 2016, v. 77, n. 4, p. 763
- Article
21
- Ohio State Law Journal, 2016, v. 77, n. 4, p. 763
- Article
22
- Ohio State Law Journal, 2014, v. 75, n. 5, p. 969
- Article
23
- Michigan Law Review, 2016, v. 114, n. 7, p. 1207, doi. 10.36644/mlr.114.7.inventing
- Article
24
- George Washington Law Review, 2013, v. 81, n. 6, p. 1928
- Article
25
- Review of Law & Social Change, 2015, v. 39, n. 4, p. 111
- Article
26
- Review of Law & Social Change, 2015, v. 39, n. 2, p. 173
- Article
27
- California Law Review, 2024, v. 112, p. 461, doi. 10.15779/Z389882P22
- Article
28
- California Law Review, 2014, v. 102, n. 5, p. 1123
- Elmendorf, Christopher S.;
- Spencer, Douglas M.
- Article
29
- Oklahoma City University Law Review, 2019, v. 44, n. 2, p. 183
- Article
30
- National Review of Black Politics (NRBP), 2022, v. 3, n. 3/4, p. 83, doi. 10.1525/nrbp.2022.3.3-4.83
- Article
31
- Dissent (0012-3846), 2018, v. 65, n. 3, p. 111, doi. 10.1353/dss.2018.0060
- Article
32
- Race, Gender & Class, 2015, v. 22, n. 1/2, p. 308
- Schroedel, Jean;
- Aslanian, Artour
- Article
33
- Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race, 2016, v. 13, n. 1, p. 25, doi. 10.1017/S1742058X1500017X
- King, Desmond S.;
- Smith, Rogers M.
- Article
35
- University of Memphis Law Review, 2013, v. 44, n. 2, p. 357
- Article
36
- UCLA Law Review, 2015, v. 62, n. 1, p. 236
- Article
37
- Iowa Law Review, 2015, v. 100, n. 4, p. 1389
- Charles, Guy-Uriel E.;
- Fuentes-Rohwe, Luis
- Article
38
- Iowa Law Review, 2014, v. 100, n. 1, p. 387
- Article
39
- Texas Tech Law Review, 2014, v. 46, n. 2, p. 519
- Article
40
- Washington & Lee Law Review, 2014, v. 71, n. 3, p. 2115
- Article
41
- Stanford Law Review, 2015, v. 67, n. 4, p. 917
- Article
42
- Indiana Law Journal, 2016, v. 92, n. 1, p. 299
- Article
44
- Chicago-Kent Law Review, 2018, v. 93, n. 2, p. 453
- Article
45
- Chicago-Kent Law Review, 2018, v. 93, n. 2, p. 325
- Article
46
- Arizona Law Review, 2014, v. 56, n. 1, p. 281
- Article
47
- George Washington Law Review Arguendo, 2013, v. 81, n. 6, p. 1928
- Article
48
- Harvard Political Review, 2013, v. 40, n. 3, p. 22
- Article
49
- Harvard Political Review, 2013, v. 40, n. 2, p. 15
- Article
50
- Boston University Law Review, 2019, v. 99, n. 2, p. 317
- Article