CAPITAL DISCRIMINATION.
- Published in:
- Houston Law Review, 2022, v. 59, n. 4, p. 843
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Works matching DE "SHAREHOLDER oppression"
Results: 16
1
2
HELP FROM ACROSS THE POND: APPLYING THE U.K. LAW COMMISSION'S PRESUMPTION THAT EXCLUSION FROM MANAGEMENT IN A PRIVATE COMPANY IS UNFAIRLY PREJUDICIAL AS A GUIDE TO ASSESSING CLAIMS OF MINORITY SHAREHOLDER OPPRESSION IN U.S. CLOSELY HELD CORPORATIONS.
- Published in:
- South Carolina Journal of International Law & Business, 2009, v. 6, n. 1, p. 129
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
3
An empirical look at the consequences of oppression actions in Singapore.
- Published in:
- Journal of Corporate Law Studies, 2017, v. 17, n. 2, p. 405, doi. 10.1080/14735970.2017.1298889
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
4
THE OPPRESSION REMEDY--CLARIFICATIONS ON BOUNDARIES.
- Published in:
- Journal of Corporate Law Studies, 2015, v. 15, n. 2, p. 407, doi. 10.1080/14735970.2015.1044768
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
5
The Big Crowd and the Small Enterprise: Intracorporate Disputes in the Close-But-Crowdfunded Firm.
- Published in:
- Penn State Law Review, 2017, v. 122, n. 2, p. 411
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
6
Oppression--Reducing Canadian Corporate Law to a Muddy Default.
- Published in:
- Ottawa Law Review, 2015, v. 47, n. 1, p. 123
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
7
SHAREHOLDER OPPRESSION AND THE NEW LOUISIANA BUSINESS CORPORATION ACT.
- Published in:
- Loyola Law Review, 2014, v. 60, n. 3, p. 461
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
8
SHAREHOLDER OPPRESSION AND THE NEW LOUISIANA BUSINESS CORPORATION ACT.
- Published in:
- Loyola Law Review, 2014, v. 60, n. 3, p. 461
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
9
MINORITY PUBLIC SHAREHOLDERS IN CHINA'S CONCENTRATED CAPITAL MARKETS - A NEW PARADIGM?
- Published in:
- Columbia Journal of Asian Law, 2016, v. 30, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.52214/cjal.v30i1.9207
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
10
FILLING IN THE GAPS: SHAREHOLDER OPPRESSION AFTER RITCHIE V. RUPE: Part 2.
- Published in:
- Texas Journal of Business Law, 2018, v. 47, n. 2, p. 1
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
11
FILLING IN THE GAPS: SHAREHOLDER OPPRESSION AFTER RITCHIE V. RUPE: PART 1.
- Published in:
- Texas Journal of Business Law, 2017, v. 47, n. 1, p. 47
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
12
CHALLENGING GENDER DISCRIMINATION IN CLOSELY HELD FIRMS: THE HOPE AND HAZARD OF CORPORATE OPPRESSION DOCTRINE.
- Published in:
- Indiana Law Review, 2021, v. 54, n. 1, p. 123, doi. 10.18060/25504
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
13
INVOLUNTARY DISSOLUTION: THEORY AND OPERATION IN PUBLICLY TRADED CORPORATIONS.
- Published in:
- Annual Survey of International & Comparative Law, 2018, v. 23, n. 1, p. 1
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
14
Shareholder oppression and the quest for fairness: There are many reasons why business owners end up in litigation against each other.
- Published in:
- Journal of the Missouri Bar, 2023, v. 79, n. 5, p. 216
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
15
Minority Shareholder Oppression in Florida: Legal Insights and Protections.
- Published in:
- Florida Bar Journal, 2025, v. 99, n. 3, p. 38
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
16
A Reconsideration of the Shareholder's Remedy for Oppression in Singapore.
- Published in:
- Common Law World Review, 2013, v. 42, n. 1, p. 61, doi. 10.1350/clwr.2013.42.1.0247
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article