Works matching DE "SEX discrimination laws"
1
- Yale Law Journal, 2016, v. 125, n. 7, p. 2156
- Article
2
- Yale Law Journal, 2016, v. 125, n. 7, p. 2106
- Article
3
- 2013
- AYRES, IAN;
- LUEDEMAN, RICHARD
- Essay
4
- Creighton Law Review, 2012, v. 45, n. 3, p. 581
- Article
5
- Creighton Law Review, 2004, v. 38, n. 1, p. 193
- Article
6
- University of Chicago Law Review, 2019, v. 86, n. 1, p. 1
- Dillbary, J. Shahar;
- Edwards, Griffin
- Article
7
- Actualidad Jurídica (1578-956X), 2007, n. 17, p. 188
- Article
8
- Sociologia del Diritto, 2008, v. 35, n. 1, p. 77
- Article
9
- Columbia Journal of Gender & Law, 2014, v. 27, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
10
- Columbia Journal of Gender & Law, 2012, v. 23, n. 2, p. 206
- Article
11
- Maryland Law Review, 2012, v. 71, n. 3, p. 655
- Article
12
- Australasian Gay & Lesbian Law Journal, 1997, v. 7, p. 57
- Article
13
- Urban Lawyer, 2013, v. 45, n. 4, p. 1026
- Article
14
- Journal of Consumer Policy, 1991, v. 14, n. 4, p. 371, doi. 10.1007/BF02176281
- Sverdrup, Sidsel G.;
- Stø, Eivind
- Article
15
- Revista Jurídica (0103-3506), 2016, v. 4, n. 45, p. 326, doi. 10.6084/m9.figshare.4654312
- BAPTISTA GONCALVES, ANTONIO
- Article
16
- California Law Review, 2004, v. 92, n. 1, p. 149, doi. 10.2307/3481446
- Article
17
- Columbia Law Review, 2012, v. 112, n. 7, p. 1641
- Article
18
- AGORA International Journal of Juridical Sciences, 2012, v. 2, p. 82
- Article
19
- Arbitration Journal, 1977, v. 32, n. 4, p. 241
- Article
20
- Harvard Law & Policy Review, 2020, v. 14, n. 2, p. 293
- Article
21
- FIU Law Review, 2021, v. 15, n. 2, p. 423, doi. 10.25148/lawrev.15.2.9
- Article
23
- Australian International Law Journal, 2009, v. 16, n. 1, p. 81
- Article
25
- Journal of LGBT Youth, 2011, v. 8, n. 1, p. 53, doi. 10.1080/19361653.2011.520573
- Article
26
- Politics & Gender, 2008, v. 4, n. 4, p. 587, doi. 10.1017/S1743923X08000470
- Article
29
- Sydney Law Review, 2023, v. 45, n. 3, p. 371
- Article
30
- American Bar Association Journal, 1983, v. 69, n. 10, p. 1550
- Article
31
- American Bar Association Journal, 1983, v. 69, n. 10, p. 1530
- Article
32
- American Bar Association Journal, 1982, v. 68, n. 12, p. 1560
- Article
33
- American Bar Association Journal, 1980, v. 66, n. 9, p. 1054
- Article
34
- American Bar Association Journal, 1976, v. 62, n. 2, p. 238
- Article
35
- Berkeley Journal of Gender, Law & Justice, 2018, v. 33, p. 141, doi. 10.15779/Z389882N2K
- Article
36
- Educational Evaluation & Policy Analysis, 1984, v. 6, n. 4, p. 401, doi. 10.3102/01623737006004401
- Article
37
- Deakin Law Review, 2009, v. 14, n. 2, p. 189, doi. 10.21153/dlr2009vol14no2art141
- Article
39
- Michigan Law Review, 2003, v. 101, n. 6, p. 1365
- Article
40
- Michigan Law Review, 2002, v. 101, n. 3, p. 755, doi. 10.2307/1290470
- Article
41
- Journal of Liberty & International Affairs, 2016, v. 1, n. 3, p. 20
- Article
42
- Acta Universitatis George Bacovia. Juridica, 2014, v. 3, n. 2, p. 581
- Article
43
- Review of Law & Social Change, 2015, v. 39, n. 2, p. 245
- Article
44
- Review of Law & Social Change, 2013, v. 37, n. 1, p. 151
- Article
45
- Review of Law & Social Change, 2013, v. 37, n. 1, p. 165
- Article
46
- Feminist Legal Studies, 2013, v. 21, n. 3, p. 263, doi. 10.1007/s10691-013-9252-y
- Article
48
- Statute Law Review, 2018, v. 39, n. 1, p. 72, doi. 10.1093/slr/hmw044
- Article