Works matching DE "SENTENCING reform"
1
- Indiana Law Journal, 2017, v. 92, n. 2, p. 817
- Article
2
- Federal Probation, 2016, v. 80, n. 1, p. 45
- Article
3
- Boston University Law Review, 2013, v. 93, n. 4, p. 1485
- Article
4
- Emory Law Journal, 2023, v. 72, n. 6, p. 1531
- Article
5
- Juvenile & Family Court Journal, 2019, v. 70, n. 3, p. 45, doi. 10.1111/jfcj.12145
- Article
6
- Juvenile & Family Court Journal, 2019, v. 70, n. 3, p. 25, doi. 10.1111/jfcj.12144
- Article
7
- Valparaiso University Law Review, 2013, v. 47, n. 3, p. 867
- Article
8
- Valparaiso University Law Review, 2013, v. 47, n. 3, p. 689
- Article
9
- William & Mary Law Review, 2024, v. 65, n. 4, p. 785
- Article
10
- Golden Gate University Law Review, 2011, v. 42, n. 1, p. 127
- Article
11
- Journal of Law & Politics, 2011, v. 26, n. 3, p. 305
- Article
12
- California Law Review, 2020, v. 108, n. 3, p. 941, doi. 10.15779/Z38H41JN2H
- Article
14
- British Journal of Criminology, 2023, v. 63, n. 4, p. 1041, doi. 10.1093/bjc/azac076
- Ward, Jennifer;
- Spence, Ruth
- Article
15
- University of Toledo Law Review, 2023, v. 54, n. 3, p. 443
- Article
16
- Idaho Law Review, 2018, v. 54, n. 2, p. 719
- Article
17
- Houston Law Review, 2014, v. 51, n. 5, p. 1271
- Article
18
- Houston Law Review, 2014, v. 51, n. 5, p. 1227
- Article
20
- Social Forces, 2014, v. 93, n. 1, p. 269, doi. 10.1093/sf/sou027
- Andersen, Signe Hald;
- Wildeman, Christopher
- Article
21
- New York University Law Review, 2013, v. 88, n. 3, p. 958
- Article
22
- George Washington Law Review, 2016, v. 84, n. 6, p. 1544
- Article
23
- Case Western Reserve Law Review, 2019, v. 70, n. 1, p. 53
- Article
24
- Applied Economics, 2018, v. 50, n. 24, p. 2664, doi. 10.1080/00036846.2017.1406654
- Article
25
- Vanderbilt Law Review, 2018, v. 71, n. 5, p. 1739
- Article
26
- UMKC Law Review, 2020, v. 88, n. 3, p. 711
- Article
27
- UMKC Law Review, 2018, v. 87, n. 1, p. 159
- Article
28
- UMKC Law Review, 2018, v. 87, n. 1, p. 145
- Article
29
- UMKC Law Review, 2018, v. 87, n. 1, p. 133
- Resnik, Judith;
- Bell, Kristen
- Article
30
- UMKC Law Review, 2018, v. 87, n. 1, p. 113
- Article
31
- UMKC Law Review, 2018, v. 87, n. 1, p. 97
- Joy, Peter A.;
- Uphoff, Rodney J.
- Article
32
- UMKC Law Review, 2018, v. 87, n. 1, p. 79
- Article
33
- UMKC Law Review, 2018, v. 87, n. 1, p. 61
- Article
34
- UMKC Law Review, 2018, v. 87, n. 1, p. 49
- Article
35
- UMKC Law Review, 2018, v. 87, n. 1, p. 3
- Article
36
- UMKC Law Review, 2018, v. 87, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
37
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform, 2013, v. 47, n. 1, p. 53, doi. 10.36646/mjlr.47.1.retroactivity
- Article
38
- Villanova Law Review, 2024, v. 69, n. 4, p. 817
- Article
39
- Villanova Law Review, 2014, v. 59, n. 3, p. 563
- Article
40
- University of Miami Law Review, 2022, v. 76, n. 2, p. 525
- Article
41
- Marquette Law Review, 2012, v. 95, n. 4, p. 1679
- Article
42
- Columbia Journal of Law & Social Problems, 2020, v. 53, n. 3, p. 365
- Article
44
- Punishment & Society, 2014, v. 16, n. 4, p. 474, doi. 10.1177/1462474514539539
- Roberts, Julian V;
- de Keijser, Jan W
- Article
45
- Penn State Law Review, 2023, v. 127, n. 2, p. 599
- Article
46
- Loyola Law Review, 2023, v. 70, n. 1, p. 219
- Article
47
- Loyola Law Review, 2018, v. 64, n. 3, p. 239
- Article
48
- Cardozo Law Review, 2019, v. 41, n. 1, p. 243
- Article
50
- Texas Law Review, 2024, v. 102, n. 7, p. 1615
- Article