BEYOND CRUEL AND UNUSUAL: SOLITARY CONFINEMENT AND DIGNITARY INTERESTS.Published in:Alabama Law Review, 2017, v. 68, n. 4, p. 1117Publication type:Article
DISCIPLINARY SEGREGATION: HOW THE PUNITIVE SOLITARY CONFINEMENT POLICY IN FEDERAL PRISONS VIOLATES THE DUE PROCESS CLAUSE OF THE FIFTH AMENDMENT IN SPITE OF SANDIN V. CONNER.Published in:Marquette Law Review, 2015, v. 99, n. 2, p. 477By:HENDERSON, GRANTPublication type:Article
DUE PROCESS IN PRISON: PROTECTING INMATES' PROPERTY AFTER SANDIN V. CONNER.Published in:Columbia Law Review, 2012, v. 112, n. 8, p. 2110By:Cassel, KaitlinPublication type:Article
THE PRISONERS' PROPERTY DILEMMA: THE PROPER APPROACH TO DETERMINE PRISONERS' PROTECTED PROPERTY INTERESTS AFTER SANDIN AND CASTLE ROCK.Published in:Georgia Law Review, 2012, v. 47, n. 1, p. 241By:Kennelly, Corbin RobertPublication type:Article