Works matching DE "SAME-sex marriage lawsuits"
1
- Oxford Journal of Law & Religion, 2017, v. 6, n. 2, p. 411, doi. 10.1093/ojlr/rwx008
- Article
2
- Oxford Journal of Law & Religion, 2017, v. 6, n. 1, p. 196, doi. 10.1093/ojlr/rww074
- Article
3
- Oxford Journal of Law & Religion, 2015, v. 4, n. 3, p. 530, doi. 10.1093/ojlr/rwv047
- Article
4
- Oxford Journal of Law & Religion, 2015, v. 4, n. 2, p. 320, doi. 10.1093/ojlr/rwv014
- Article
6
- Juridical Current, 2013, v. 16, n. 4, p. 172
- Article
7
- Texas Review of Law & Politics, 2015, v. 20, n. 1, p. 29
- Article
8
- Creighton Law Review, 2017, v. 50, n. 3, p. 685
- Article
9
- University of Chicago Law Review, 2019, v. 86, n. 6, p. 1563
- Article
10
- University of Chicago Law Review, 2016, v. 83, n. 3, p. 1417
- Article
11
- Villanova Law Review, 2016, v. 61, n. 3, p. 405
- BRENNAN, PATRICK MCKINLEY
- Article
12
- Columbia Journal of Asian Law, 2017, v. 31, n. 1, p. 72
- Ming-Sung Kuo;
- Hui-Wen Chen
- Article
13
- Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy, 2019, v. 33, n. 1, p. 109
- Article
14
- Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy, 2017, v. 31, n. 2, p. 431
- SCHILLING JR., NICHOLAS J.
- Article
15
- International Policy Digest, 2016, v. 3, n. 2, p. 52
- Berg, Justin;
- Conover-Williams, Meredith
- Article
16
- Law & Sexuality: A Review of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual & Transgender Legal Issues, 2018, v. 27, p. 145
- Article
17
- Law & Sexuality: A Review of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual & Transgender Legal Issues, 2018, v. 27, p. 133
- Article
18
- Law & Sexuality: A Review of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual & Transgender Legal Issues, 2018, v. 27, p. 117
- Article
19
- Law & Sexuality: A Review of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual & Transgender Legal Issues, 2018, v. 27, p. 1
- Article
20
- Law & Sexuality: A Review of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual & Transgender Legal Issues, 2016, v. 25, p. 43
- Article
21
- Law & Sexuality: A Review of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual & Transgender Legal Issues, 2016, v. 25, p. 1
- Article
23
- Michigan State Law Review, 2013, v. 2013, n. 4, p. 1385
- Article
24
- Cardozo Law Review, 2017, v. 38, n. 4, p. 1397
- Article
25
- Alabama Law Review, 2017, v. 68, n. 3, p. 855
- Article
26
- Alabama Law Review, 2016, v. 68, n. 2, p. 583
- Article
27
- Minnesota Law Review, 2019, v. 104, n. 1, p. 243
- Article
28
- Indiana Law Review, 2016, v. 49, n. 2, p. 397, doi. 10.18060/4806.0071
- Article
29
- Indiana Law Review, 2016, v. 49, n. 2, p. 367, doi. 10.18060/4806.0070
- Article
30
- Indiana Law Review, 2015, v. 48, n. 4, p. 1297, doi. 10.18060/4806.0043
- HIGDON, AMY E.;
- BARRY, EMILY J.
- Article
31
- National Lawyers Guild Review, 2015, v. 72, n. 1, p. 55
- Article
32
- National Lawyers Guild Review, 2015, v. 72, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
33
- Journal of Legal Analysis, 2014, v. 6, n. 1, p. 87, doi. 10.1093/jla/lau002
- Article
35
- Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, 2016, v. 49, n. 2, p. 351
- Article
36
- Society, 2018, v. 55, n. 1, p. 25, doi. 10.1007/s12115-017-0208-8
- Article
37
- Boston University Law Review, 2019, v. 99, n. 6, p. 2685
- Article
38
- Boston University Law Review, 2019, v. 99, n. 6, p. 2671
- Article
39
- New York Law School Law Review, 2017, v. 62, n. 2/3, p. 303
- Article
41
- Washington University Journal of Law & Policy, 2017, v. 54, p. 149
- Article
42
- Sydney Law Review, 2019, v. 41, n. 4, p. 517
- Article
43
- Utah Law Review, 2017, v. 2017, n. 3, p. 463
- Article
44
- Family Law Quarterly, 2018, v. 52, n. 2, p. 385
- Article
45
- Cross Currents, 2018, v. 68, n. 4, p. 488, doi. 10.1111/cros.12336
- Article
46
- University of Pittsburgh Law Review, 2018, v. 79, n. 4, p. 753, doi. 10.5195/lawreview.2018.575
- Article
47
- University of New South Wales Law Journal, 2014, v. 37, n. 2, p. 544
- LYNCH, ANDREW;
- WILLIAMS, GEORGE
- Article
48
- Georgia State University Law Review, 2016, v. 33, n. 1, p. 1
- Kuck, Phillip;
- Newsome, William Cody
- Article
49
- Hoover Digest: Research & Opinion on Public Policy, 2015, n. 4, p. 133
- Article
50
- Washington & Lee Law Review, 2018, v. 75, n. 4, p. 2005
- Article