Works matching DE "SAME-sex marriage lawsuits"
1
- Creighton Law Review, 2017, v. 50, n. 3, p. 685
- Article
2
- University of Chicago Law Review, 2019, v. 86, n. 6, p. 1563
- Article
3
- University of Chicago Law Review, 2016, v. 83, n. 3, p. 1417
- Article
4
- Villanova Law Review, 2016, v. 61, n. 3, p. 405
- BRENNAN, PATRICK MCKINLEY
- Article
5
- Duke Law Journal, 2015, v. 64, n. 6, p. 1173
- Article
6
- Political Theology, 2016, v. 17, n. 5, p. 465, doi. 10.1080/1462317X.2016.1211297
- Article
7
- New York Law School Law Review, 2017, v. 62, n. 2/3, p. 303
- Article
9
- Washington University Journal of Law & Policy, 2017, v. 54, p. 149
- Article
10
- Sydney Law Review, 2019, v. 41, n. 4, p. 517
- Article
11
- Cardozo Law Review, 2017, v. 38, n. 4, p. 1397
- Article
12
- Journal of Church & State, 2017, v. 59, n. 1, p. 81, doi. 10.1093/jcs/csv100
- Article
13
- Cross Currents, 2018, v. 68, n. 4, p. 488, doi. 10.1111/cros.12336
- Article
14
- Journal of Gender, Race & Justice, 2017, v. 20, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
15
- Journal of Gender, Race & Justice, 2014, v. 17, n. 3, p. 471
- WASHINGTON, TANYA;
- BROWN, J. ROBERT;
- POLLVOGT, SUSANNAH W.;
- SMITH, CATHERINE E.;
- VELTE, KYLE C.
- Article
16
- Journal of Gender, Race & Justice, 2014, v. 17, n. 3, p. 467
- Washington, Tanya;
- Smith, Catherine;
- Pollvogt, Susannah
- Article
17
- Faulkner Law Review, 2015, v. 7, n. 1, p. 105
- Article
18
- Indiana International & Comparative Law Review, 2018, v. 28, n. 2, p. 197, doi. 10.18060/7909.0060
- Article
19
- Benefits Quarterly, 2015, v. 31, n. 4, p. 55
- Article
20
- Juridical Current, 2013, v. 16, n. 4, p. 172
- Article
21
- Washington University Law Review, 2016, v. 93, n. 6, p. 1577
- Article
22
- UCLA Law Review, 2017, v. 64, n. 6, p. 1662
- Article
23
- Minnesota Law Review, 2019, v. 104, n. 1, p. 243
- Article
24
- Washington & Lee Law Review, 2018, v. 75, n. 4, p. 2005
- Article
25
- Washington & Lee Law Review, 2014, v. 71, n. 1, p. 229
- Kafker, Scott L.;
- Russcol, David A.
- Article
26
- Oxford Journal of Law & Religion, 2017, v. 6, n. 2, p. 411, doi. 10.1093/ojlr/rwx008
- Article
27
- Oxford Journal of Law & Religion, 2017, v. 6, n. 1, p. 196, doi. 10.1093/ojlr/rww074
- Article
28
- Oxford Journal of Law & Religion, 2015, v. 4, n. 3, p. 530, doi. 10.1093/ojlr/rwv047
- Article
29
- Oxford Journal of Law & Religion, 2015, v. 4, n. 2, p. 320, doi. 10.1093/ojlr/rwv014
- Article
31
- Human: Journal for Interdisciplinary Studies, 2014, v. 4, n. 1, p. 4, doi. 10.21554/hrr.011402
- Article
32
- Boston University Law Review, 2019, v. 99, n. 6, p. 2685
- Article
33
- Boston University Law Review, 2019, v. 99, n. 6, p. 2671
- Article
34
- Georgia State University Law Review, 2016, v. 33, n. 1, p. 1
- Kuck, Phillip;
- Newsome, William Cody
- Article
35
- Ave Maria Law Review, 2015, v. 13, n. 2, p. 207
- Article
36
- Arkansas Law Review (1968-present), 2019, v. 72, n. 1, p. 245
- Article
37
- Alabama Law Review, 2017, v. 68, n. 3, p. 855
- Article
38
- Alabama Law Review, 2016, v. 68, n. 2, p. 583
- Article
39
- Hoover Digest: Research & Opinion on Public Policy, 2015, n. 4, p. 133
- Article
40
- American Journal of Trial Advocacy, 2018, v. 42, n. 1, p. 239
- Article
41
- Columbia Journal of Asian Law, 2017, v. 31, n. 1, p. 72
- Ming-Sung Kuo;
- Hui-Wen Chen
- Article
42
- Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy, 2019, v. 33, n. 1, p. 109
- Article
43
- Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy, 2017, v. 31, n. 2, p. 431
- SCHILLING JR., NICHOLAS J.
- Article
45
- Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, 2016, v. 49, n. 2, p. 351
- Article
46
- Society, 2018, v. 55, n. 1, p. 25, doi. 10.1007/s12115-017-0208-8
- Article
47
- Indiana Law Review, 2016, v. 49, n. 2, p. 367, doi. 10.18060/4806.0070
- Article
48
- Indiana Law Review, 2016, v. 49, n. 2, p. 397, doi. 10.18060/4806.0071
- Article
49
- Indiana Law Review, 2015, v. 48, n. 4, p. 1297, doi. 10.18060/4806.0043
- HIGDON, AMY E.;
- BARRY, EMILY J.
- Article
50
- Journal of Legal Analysis, 2014, v. 6, n. 1, p. 87, doi. 10.1093/jla/lau002
- Article