Works matching DE "RESPONSIBILITY -- Law %26 legislation"
1
- Boston University Law Review, 2021, v. 101, n. 2, p. 803
- Article
3
- Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 2019, v. 47, p. 23, doi. 10.1177/1073110519857310
- Article
4
- Florida Bar Journal, 2016, v. 90, n. 9, p. 44
- Article
5
- Economic Science for Rural Development Conference Proceedings, 2017, n. 44, p. 83
- Article
6
- Canadian Nurse, 2018, v. 114, n. 1, p. 28
- Article
7
- American Journal of Comparative Law, 2013, v. 61, n. 4, p. 831, doi. 10.5131/AJCL.2013.0006
- Article
8
- Vanderbilt Law Review, 2017, v. 70, n. 2, p. 565
- Article
9
- Vniversitas, 2015, n. 130, p. 347, doi. 10.11144/Javeriana.vj130.hmde
- Article
10
- Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 2016, v. 36, n. 2, p. 219, doi. 10.1093/ojls/gqv032
- Article
11
- Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 2013, v. 33, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.1093/ojls/gqs028
- Lacey, Nicola;
- Pickard, Hanna
- Article
12
- Hospital Pharmacy, 2016, v. 51, n. 2, p. 132, doi. 10.1310/hpj5102-132
- Article
13
- Journal of Diabetes Nursing, 2015, v. 19, n. 5, p. 174
- Article
14
- Signos, 2014, v. 6, n. 1, p. 121
- Elena R., Schislyaeva;
- Olga A., Saichenko;
- Olga V., Mirolybova
- Article
15
- Psychology & Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice, 2018, v. 91, n. 3, p. 317, doi. 10.1111/papt.12162
- Cheetham, John;
- Holttum, Sue;
- Springham, Neil;
- Butt, Kate
- Article
16
- Canadian Psychology / Psychologie Canadienne, 2018, v. 59, n. 1, p. 65, doi. 10.1037/cap0000124
- Grant, Tessa;
- Furlano, Rosaria;
- Hall, Layla;
- Kelley, Elizabeth
- Article
17
- Juridical Tribune / Tribuna Juridica, 2017, v. 7, n. 2, p. 166
- Article
18
- Hofstra Law Review, 2016, v. 45, n. 1, p. 217
- Article
20
- Edinburgh Law Review, 2022, v. 26, n. 1, p. 79, doi. 10.3366/elr.2022.0739
- Article
21
- Washington University Law Review, 2021, v. 98, n. 6, p. 1857
- Article
22
- Washington University Law Review, 2021, v. 98, n. 6, p. 1821
- Article
23
- Washington University Law Review, 2021, v. 98, n. 6, p. 1607
- Article
24
- Nursing Ethics, 2020, v. 27, n. 2, p. 567, doi. 10.1177/0969733019851542
- Rubio-Navarro, Alfonso;
- García-Capilla, Diego José;
- Torralba-Madrid, Maria José;
- Rutty, Jane
- Article
25
- Alberta Law Review, 2013, v. 50, n. 3, p. 615, doi. 10.29173/alr98
- Article
26
- Boston College Law Review, 2015, v. 56, n. 4, p. 1501
- Article
27
- British Journal of Midwifery, 2011, v. 19, n. 5, p. 327, doi. 10.12968/bjom.2011.19.5.327
- Article
28
- North Carolina Journal of International Law & Commercial Regulation, 2014, v. 40, n. 1, p. 171
- Article
29
- Tennessee Bar Journal, 2013, v. 49, n. 1, p. 3
- Article
30
- Journal of Policy Analysis & Management, 2016, v. 35, n. 1, p. 223, doi. 10.1002/pam.21887
- Article
31
- Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts, 2021, v. 44, n. 2, p. 123, doi. 10.52214/jla.v44i2.7821
- Article
32
- University of San Francisco Law Review, 2017, v. 51, n. 2, p. 173
- Article
33
- American Journal of Trial Advocacy, 2014, v. 37, n. 3, p. 541
- Thomas, D. Alan;
- Southerland, John Isaac;
- Jett Jr., Gardner M. "Chip"
- Article
34
- Albany Law Review, 2011, v. 74, n. 3, p. 1277
- Hall, Donna L.;
- Miraglia, Richard P.;
- Li-Wen G. Lee
- Article
35
- Community Eye Health Journal, 2019, v. 32, n. 106, p. 40
- Article